December, 05 2008, 01:28pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
James Freedland, ACLU national, (646) 785-1894 or (212) 549-2666; media@aclu.org;
Sara Mullen, ACLU of Pennsylvania, (215) 592-1513 x122; smullen@aclupa.org
Federal Court Rejects Bush Administration's Attempt to Deport Torture Victim Without Due Process
ACLU Successfully Challenges Government Over Egypt’s 'Diplomatic Assurances' Not to Torture
PHILADELPHIA
Rebuffing
the Bush administration's efforts to deport Egyptian torture victim
Sameh Khouzam, a federal appeals court today upheld his right to
challenge Egypt's "diplomatic assurances" that it will not torture
Khouzam upon his return. This is the latest development in an ongoing
American Civil Liberties Union lawsuit on behalf of Khouzam.
Last January, in the first decision
of its kind, a federal district court sided with the ACLU and ordered
the government to stop the deportation of Khouzam based on secret and
unreliable promises and release him under conditions of supervision.
However, the Bush administration appealed this ruling, claiming that
the executive branch has unfettered authority to deport Khouzam and to
detain him indefinitely pending his legal proceedings.
"This is a significant victory for
due process and the rights of all people - citizens or not - to be free
from torture," said Amrit Singh, staff attorney with the ACLU
Immigrants' Rights Project, who argued the case before the court
earlier this year. "It is also a stinging rejection of the government's
attempts to deprive the judiciary of its constitutional obligation to
conduct meaningful review in the face of unilateral assertions of
executive power."
Khouzam, a Christian who came to the
United States in 1998 fleeing religious persecution in Egypt, was
granted protection from deportation under the Convention Against
Torture (CAT) in 2004 after a federal appeals court found that he would
likely be tortured if sent back to Egypt. Despite this finding, as well
as State Department reports showing that Egypt routinely engages in
torture, the U.S. government tried to summarily deport Khouzam to Egypt
based on diplomatic assurances the U.S. claims to have received from
the Egyptian government that it asserts are "sufficiently reliable" to
protect him from torture.
In today's opinion, the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Third Circuit stated, "the Government did not permit
Khouzam to see the written diplomatic assurances that had been obtained
from Egypt, and provided no information pertaining to the Government's
reasons for crediting those assurances...we find no record supporting
the reliability of the diplomatic assurances that purportedly justified
the termination of his deferral of removal."
"This is a great victory for the
rule of law. The appeals court recognized that the Bush administration
cannot simply eliminate the role of the courts in reviewing the
government's actions - that kind of power grab flies in the face of
every principle of American law," said Lee Gelernt, Deputy Director of
the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project, who also argued this case before
the court.
Ratified by the U.S. in 1994, and
implemented by domestic legislation, the Convention Against Torture
prohibits the U.S. from transferring a person "to another State where
there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger
of being subjected to torture." The U.S. government is attempting to
use diplomatic assurances - in Khouzam's case and others - to
circumvent its treaty obligations, and transferring individuals to
foreign countries without judicial review.
"The court was absolutely right to
reject the Bush administration's extraordinary claim that it can send a
man to a country where he will almost certainly be tortured without any
mechanism to review the government's actions," said Judy Rabinovitz,
Deputy Director of the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project.
In Khouzam's case, neither he nor
his lawyers have seen the Egyptian assurances that are the basis for
terminating his CAT protection. Nor has the U.S. government offered any
explanation for why these assurances would be deemed sufficiently
reliable to protect Khouzam from torture. Indeed, Khouzam did not
receive any notice that his CAT protection was being terminated until
May 29 of last year, when, upon appearing for a routine check-in with
immigration authorities, he was taken into detention and provided with
a one-paragraph explanation from Julie Myers, Assistant Secretary of
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, informing him that he could be
removed within 72 hours.
Attorneys representing Khouzam are
Singh, Gelernt and Rabinovitz of the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project,
Vic Walczak and Mary Catherine Roper of the ACLU of Pennsylvania and
Morton Sklar of World Organization for Human Rights USA.
Friend-of-the-court briefs in
support of the ACLU's case have been submitted by Human Rights Watch,
Amnesty International, Center for Constitutional Rights, International
Commission of Jurists, International Federation for Human Rights, World
Organization Against Torture, Redress, American Center for Law &
Justice, European Centre for Law & Justice and respected scholars
of international human rights law.
Many prominent lawmakers and
advocacy groups of all political stripes have written letters on behalf
of Khouzam, including Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA), Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA),
Rep. Joseph Pitts (R-PA), the Traditional Values Coalition, Concerned
Women for America, the Coptic Assembly of America and the Institute on
Religion and Public Policy. Many of these letters as well as the ACLU's
brief and other documents related to the case are available at: www.aclu.org/immigrants/gen/35805res20020307.html
Today's decision is available at: www.aclu.org/immigrants/gen/37987lgl20081205.html
The American Civil Liberties Union was founded in 1920 and is our nation's guardian of liberty. The ACLU works in the courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
(212) 549-2666LATEST NEWS
'There Is No Defense for Forced Famine,' Says Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
"Starving a million innocent people to death by halting and slowing U.S. humanitarian assistance is a massive, deliberate choice."
Mar 25, 2024
U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Sunday reiterated her description of the Israeli military's actions in Gaza as a "forced famine" and pushed back on the Netanyahu government's claim that it is targeting militants who carried out the October 7 attack.
"There is no targeting of Hamas in precipitating a mass famine of a million people, half of whom are children," Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) told CNN's Jake Tapper just two days after she delivered a floor speech characterizing conditions on the ground in Gaza as "an unfolding genocide."
The New York Democrat said Sunday that she believes the Israeli government's conduct in Gaza—from obstructing aid shipments to bombing densely populated areas—"have crossed the threshold of intent," a necessary condition of genocide.
"It is horrific," she said, noting that the even U.S. State Department has admitted the Israeli government is intentionally stonewalling aid deliveries, fueling starvation across the territory.
Asked to respond to the Israeli government's claim that the war would end within a day if Hamas released all the remaining hostages and dropped its arms, Ocasio-Cortez said, "The actions of Hamas should not be tied to whether a three-year-old can eat."
"The actions of Hamas do not justify forcing thousands, hundreds of thousands of people to eat grass as their bodies consume themselves," she continued. "The Israeli government has a right to go after Hamas, but we are talking about a population of millions of innocent Palestinians. We are talking about collective punishment."
CNN with all the resources can't determine if Israel is intentionally causing this famine, which UN and EU top diplomat & others said it's a ‘Man-made famine’ that led AOC to believe that's a genocide "I think with a forced famine is beyond our ability to deny or explain away" https://t.co/NwIMvnkB3l pic.twitter.com/48W73D3bsT
— HalalFlow (@halalflow) March 24, 2024
In a social media post following her CNN appearance, Ocasio-Cortez wrote that "starving a million innocent people to death by halting and slowing U.S. humanitarian assistance is a massive, deliberate choice."
The post came in response to criticism from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which has been described as "Israel's Attack Dog in the U.S." The group declared that the Israeli military is working to "cripple Hamas terrorists" and said those warning of genocide "merely perpetuate false claims and foster hate."
Ocasio-Cortez replied that the starvation Israel is inflicting on Gaza civilians with its suffocating blockade is both "irrelevant" to the government's stated objective of targeting Hamas and brings it "further out of reach and endangers hostages."
"There is no defense for forced famine," Ocasio-Cortez wrote.
The New York Democrat's assessment of the dire humanitarian crisis in Gaza mirrors that of United Nations experts, aid agencies, and humanitarian organizations.
On Sunday, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA)—the primary humanitarian aid organization operating in Gaza—said the Israeli government has informed the U.N. that it "will no longer approve any UNRWA food convoys" to the northern part of the enclave, which is facing famine.
In recent weeks, dozens of people have died of starvation and dehydration—most of them in northern Gaza.
"This is outrageous and makes it intentional to obstruct lifesaving assistance during a man-made famine," Philippe Lazzarini, UNRWA's commissioner-general, said of Israel's decision to fully cut off UNRWA food shipments to northern Gaza.
"By preventing UNRWA to fulfill its mandate in Gaza, the clock will tick faster towards famine and many more will die of hunger, dehydration, and lack of shelter," he warned. "This cannot happen, it would only stain our collective humanity."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders: 'The Netanyahu Gov't Should Not Receive Another Penny from US'
The bill passed the Senate in a 74-24 vote at 2:03AM
Mar 23, 2024
Following the passing of the U.S. government appropriations bill early Saturday morning, Senator Bernie Sanders said:
I voted NO on the appropriations bill that the Senate passed last night. While hundreds of thousands of Palestinian children face starvation in Gaza, this bill actually prohibits funding to UNWRA, the key United Nations aid agency delivering life-saving humanitarian support. This will only intensify the already horrific situation in Gaza. This bill also provides another $3.3 billion in U.S. military aid for Netanyahu’s right-wing government to continue this barbaric war. The Netanyahu government should not receive another penny from U.S. taxpayers.
The bill passed the Senate in a 74-24 vote at 2:03AM Saturday morning following hours of intense negotiations.
Later on Saturday, President Biden signed the $1.2 trillion government funding bill to stave off a government shutdown.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Modi Government Crackdown on Dissent Hits 'Crisis Point' Before Indian Elections
"The growing crackdown clearly shows the authorities' blatant disregard for human rights and rule of law," said one Amnesty International campaigner.
Mar 22, 2024
As India's right-wing government cracks down on opposition ahead of next month's general elections, Amnesty International on Friday urged authorities to "stop weaponizing the criminal justice system to intimidate and harass" political candidates, activists, and others.
Protests broke out in the capital New Delhi and other Indian cities after police on Thursday arrested Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, an opposition leader from the Aam Aadmi Party, over corruption allegations AAP members say are politically motivated. Two other AAP leaders were previously arrested in connection with the same case, which involves the alleged favoring of certain alcohol vendors and illegal campaign financing.
Authorities also froze the bank accounts of another leading opposition party, the Indian National Congress, over a tax dispute that dates back to 2018. Party leader Sonia Gandhi accused Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) party of perpetrating "a systematic effort to cripple the party financially."
“They want to know we are corrupt like them, which is not the case.” – AAP chief spokesperson Priyanka Kakkar on the BJP’s crackdown on opposition politicians.
AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal was arrested just today on charges of corruption.
The India Report: https://t.co/rxPr6zKnWx pic.twitter.com/P3eSbxVTVm
— Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) March 21, 2024
Gandhi, Kejriwal and others have repeatedly accused of Modi's government of misusing federal agencies and resources to repress opposition figures as elections loom. The BJP denies the allegations.
"The Bharatiya Janata Party-led Indian government's crackdown on peaceful dissent and opposition has now reached a crisis point," Amnesty International India board chair Aakar Patel said in a statement.
"The authorities have repeatedly exploited and weaponized various financial and terrorism laws to systematically crack down on human rights defenders, activists, critics, nonprofit organizations, journalists, students, academics, and political opposition," Patel added. "The arrest of Arvind Kejriwal and the freezing of Indian National Congress' bank accounts a few weeks before India holds its general elections show the authorities' blatant failure to uphold the country's international human rights obligations."
Patel continued:
What we are witnessing is a brutal crackdown on human rights including through the misuse of central investigative and financial agencies, attacks on peaceful protests, arbitrary arrests, use and export of invasive spyware for unlawful surveillance, [and] systematic discrimination against religious minorities to feed into their majoritarian Hindutva politics and targeted suspension of opposition leaders from the Parliament who dare to hold the authorities to account.
"The growing crackdown clearly shows the authorities' blatant disregard for human rights and rule of law," Patel added. "Authorities must respect, protect, promote, and fulfill the human rights of everyone in the country including human rights defenders, activists, and opposition candidates before, during, and after the general elections which are due to begin in April 2024. Authorities must also ensure access to justice and effective remedies for victims of human rights violations."
On Thursday, the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission held a hearing on the situation in India.
The commission noted that in recent years, as Modi and the BJP have consolidated power, "concerns about human rights abuses in India have grown" over "a wide range of significant rights issues, including restrictions on religious and press freedoms, violence or threats of violence targeting members of national/racial/ethnic and religious minorities, harassment of and restrictions on civil society and human rights organizations, corruption, and lack of accountability."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular