|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: Institute for Public Accuracy (IPA) Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167 |
Top UN Official: Apartheid by Israel
WASHINGTON - November 26 - The Jerusalem Post reports: "General Assembly President Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann said the international community should consider sanctions against Israel including 'boycott, divestment and sanctions' similar to those enacted against South Africa two decades ago."
In his remarks, d'Escoto said: "Israeli policies in the Occupied Palestinian Territories appear so similar to the apartheid of an earlier era, a continent away. I believe it is very important that we in the United Nations use this term. We must not be afraid to call something what it is."
PHYLLIS BENNIS Bennis is a fellow of the Institute for Policy Studies and serves on the steering committee of the U.S. Campaign to End Israeli Occupation. Her books include Understanding the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict: A Primer.
She said today: "The humanitarian crisis in Gaza -- which will not be reversed simply by Israel's one-time loosening of the siege on Monday -- has escalated largely outside public view, with Israel continuing to prevent foreign journalists and UN officials from entering, while keeping Palestinian journalists and human rights workers from leaving the besieged Gaza Strip. Father Miguel d'Escoto's statement to the UN General Assembly on Monday helped cast some new light on that too-often hidden reality.
"But even beyond the Gaza crisis, d'Escoto's statement was significant for his call on the United Nations to follow the lead of former Presidents Nelson Mandela and Jimmy Carter, along with a growing number of Jewish, Christian and other civil society organizations around the world, including the U.S. Campaign to End Israeli Occupation here in the U.S., who recognize the applicability of the term 'apartheid' to describe Israeli policies towards Palestinians, and call for a South African-style non-violent boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign to pressure Israel to end those illegal practices." More Information
Video of d'Escoto's remarks are available here (registration required).
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
5 Comments so far
Show AllThis is outstanding and by an organization founded by Norman Solomon.
AD
isreal and bush are both such criminals. The sooner they both go away the better.
Jake
I am surprised that, in the interest of "public accuracy"), no mention is made in the above article, of the Palestinian leaders responsibility in this disaster. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon strongly condemned the rocket fire by the Palestinians and suggested a solution required all parties to respect the calm brokered by Egypt.
I feel using the apartheid theme has nothing to do with the current problem but certainly has strong emotional appeal.
Ban Ki-Moon also condemned the Israeli policies in Gaza as "unacceptable" and urged Israel to reopen the borders there. I am "surprised" that in the interest of "public accuracy" you left that out, not to mention Israel's systematic stealing of Palestinian land, its practice of torture (also condemned by the U.N.), targeted assassinations with no regard for civilian casualties, not to mention the hundreds of U.N. security council resolutions Israel is thumbing its nose at.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_Nations_resolutions_concerning_Israel
If Israel was really concerned about stopping rocket fire, they might begin by stopping their terrorism and genocidal actions towards the Palestinian people.
Yeah, genocide....it has "strong emotional appeal too." But it's the truth, Jake.
Anyone who sites Wikipedia as there reference is an idiot. Those aren't my words but rather my 5th grade english teacher. Israel has lunched a blockade of Gaza which as you know is an act of war however Hamas had previously declared an state of war with Israel. So if its war the Palestinians wanted who is everybody upset? Its warfare now i'll agree with you the Palestinian bodycount is much higher than the Israeli but that simply b/c Israel is much better at war than the Palestinians. To close i want to reference a UN study-that's a respected source-nearly 90% of Israeli deaths were civilians while 75% of Palestinian deaths were Militants. Israel does try to avoid civilians while the Palestinians seem to avoid the Israeli military and instead target civilians...that is why the US has unwavering support for Israeli. We hate people who like to blow up children and yes intent does matter in the country.