November, 05 2008, 01:58pm EDT
Election Results A Major Victory For Common Sense Gun Laws
WASHINGTON
The election of Barack Obama as President and Joe Biden as Vice
President along with significant wins in the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives and key state legislative chambers, have
significantly improved the political environment for progress on gun
violence prevention issues in the years ahead.
The results also constitute a massive defeat for the leadership of the
National Rifle Association, which said it spent more than $10 million
to tell voters that President-Elect Obama would be "the most anti-gun
President in American history." According to Paul Helmke, President of
the Brady Campaign, "the NRA bosses went 'all in' and lost big. They
spent millions on their campaign to 'defeat Obama' and failed."
The gun lobby's single-issue voters failed to deliver. The NRA spent
heavily on TV and radio advertising in states that landed decisively in
the Democratic column, including Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, New
Mexico, Florida, Nevada, Wisconsin, Minnesota and others. It spent more
than $1 million on Senate races, with the largest amounts going towards
losing races in North Carolina and Colorado.
"When it comes to common sense gun policies, our candidates won, the
NRA's candidates lost, and efforts to use the gun issue as a wedge
issue flopped," Helmke said. "We know of no candidate anywhere, at any
level, for any office, who lost a race because of support for common
sense gun measures."
"This is a good day for people who want to reduce gun violence in
America," said Sarah Brady, Chair of the Brady Campaign. "It's a bad
day for extremists who are stuck in the rhetoric of the past."
The Brady Campaign issued a strong endorsement for the Obama-Biden
ticket in early October. President-Elect Obama consistently supported
sensible gun laws in the U.S. Senate and in the Illinois State Senate.
Vice President-Elect Biden not only has supported, but also has been a
leader for strong gun laws throughout his career in the U.S. Senate.
In races for the U.S. Senate, at least four seats previously filled by
opponents of common sense gun laws went to candidates who take more
reasonable positions. Where the Brady Campaign endorsed in U.S. Senate
races against candidates either endorsed or "A" rated by the NRA, seven
out of seven Brady-endorsed candidates won.
In the U.S. House, in matchups between Brady Campaign-endorsed
candidates and candidates either endorsed or "A" rated by the NRA,
better than 84 percent of the Brady candidates won. More than 91
percent of all Brady-endorsed House members won. High-profile NRA
supporters defeated yesterday included incumbents Marilyn Musgrave in
Colorado; Phil English in Pennsylvania; Ric Keller and Tom Feeney in
Florida and Joe Knollenberg in Michigan. Successful Brady-endorsed
candidates won in states like Maine (Chellie Pingree), Kentucky (John
Yarmuth), Iowa (Dave Loebsack) and Virginia (Gerry Connolly).
The New York State Senate switched from Republican to Democratic
control in part because of successful Brady Campaign-endorsed
candidates in two key races who campaigned aggressively on the gun
issue. In addition, several Brady-targeted incumbents in Illinois
state legislative races were defeated.
While economic and foreign policy issues dominated the campaigns,
Helmke pointed out that gun laws were discussed regularly during the
primaries and general election with all major candidates frequently
answering questions and taking positions on the topic. The NRA's
extensive ad buys in battleground states which ended up in the
Obama-Biden column were significant.
"President-Elect Obama has talked repeatedly about his support for
sensible gun laws and the need to keep dangerous guns out of the hands
of dangerous people. He even highlighted his support for restrictions
on assault weapons in his acceptance speech at the Democratic National
Convention in Denver," Helmke said. "Obama's message on guns,
recognizing that the Second Amendment gives people the right to own
guns subject to reasonable restrictions, is consistent with what we've
been saying since the Supreme Court's ruling on the Second Amendment
last June."
Indeed, Brady Campaign officials believe that the Supreme Court decision in D.C. v. Heller
may be part of the reason that the gun lobby's old rhetoric trying to
scare legitimate gun owners about possible confiscation of their
privately-owned firearms, was rejected at the polls. "Guns are no
longer a 'wedge' issue for most voters," Helmke said. "Rather than
being frightened with false alarms about the government taking their
guns away, most voters want to do something to make it harder for
dangerous people to get dangerous weapons and to stop the trafficking
in illegal guns."
Some additional facts and numbers about yesterday's results:
More than 91 percent of Brady Campaign endorsed candidates nationwide won their elections.
- Some Brady endorsed candidates who won House seats - like
Alan Grayson in Florida and Gary Peters in Michigan - were considered
underdogs for much of the election cycle.
- Not only did the NRA leaders endorse a candidate for President they had previously called "one of the premier flag carriers for enemies of the Second Amendment"
and graded only a "C+," but none of their highly-graded supporters -
Mike Huckabee, Fred Thompson, Ron Paul or Bill Richardson - lasted long
in the primaries.
- In head-to-head races between candidates endorsed or "A"
rated by the NRA and candidates endorsed by the Brady Campaign, the NRA
lost more than 80 percent.
- The NRA ran at least nine different television ads
attacking Obama in at least eleven states. Obama ended up winning ten
of those 11 states.
"We know many elected officials still consider anything dealing with
guns to be controversial, but yesterday's elections should encourage
them to start moving forward," Helmke said. "We know we still have to
work hard to get common sense gun laws adopted. But gun violence
victims and the survivors of loved ones lost to gun violence should be
hopeful that we can make some real progress to protect our families and
communities from gun violence in the next few years."
Brady United formerly known as The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence and its legislative and grassroots affiliate, the Brady Campaign and its dedicated network of Million Mom March Chapters, is the nation's largest, non-partisan, grassroots organization leading the fight to prevent gun violence. We are devoted to creating an America free from gun violence, where all Americans are safe at home, at school, at work, and in our communities.
LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and BrasÃlia's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular