October, 27 2008, 02:23pm EDT
New FBI Hate Crime Statistics Confirm Need for Stronger Federal Response
NEW YORK
Hate crime statistics released today by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation show a continued upward trend in certain categories of
bias motivated violence in 2007 and confirm the need for a more
vigorous response by the federal government, including enactment of the
Local Law Enforcement Hate Crime Prevention Act (S.1105, H.R. 1592) and
other steps outlined in a recent report by Human Rights First.
"There have been some glaring omissions in the federal government's
response to a serious and growing problem of hate crime violence," said
Tad Stahnke, the Director of Human Rights First's Fighting
Discrimination Program. "The United States has both legislation and an
extensive monitoring system on hate crimes. However, several steps
should be taken to help ensure that the climate surrounding illegal
immigration does not contribute to impunity for those who perpetrate
violence targeting them and to strengthen the federal and local law
enforcement response to all hate crime, including increased violence
based on sexual orientation and gender identity bias."
Although the overall number of reported hate crime incidents
remained steady from 2006 to 2007, of particular note in the 2007
statistics are continued increases in reported violent attacks against
persons of Hispanic origin and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender
(LGBT) persons. According to the new FBI report, there were 595
incidents of anti-Hispanic hate crimes in 2007, an increase of 3.3%
from the 576 incidents reported in 2006. There was also a rise in the
number of hate crimes motivated by sexual orientation bias, with a 5.5%
increase in incidents from 2006 to 2007 (from 1195 to 1265 incidents).
This confirms trends reported in Human Rights First's 2008 Hate Crime Survey.
Anti-Hispanic violence rose by 35 percent between 2003 and 2006,
according to an analysis conducted by the Southern Poverty Law Center
of FBI crime reports; anti-Hispanic incidents rose in 2007 in both the
State of California and Los Angeles County, according to official
statistics. The violence targets both U.S. citizens and foreigners, and
both legal and illegal immigrants, and has taken place amidst recent
mainstreaming of anti-immigrant rhetoric and fears. Many incidents
appear to target those perceived to be or provide assistance to illegal
immigrants.
Sexual orientation bias crimes are also on the rise, and continue to
be characterized by a high level of violence. Five of the nine reported
hate crime killings were on the basis of sexual orientation bias. There
is also a higher proportion of personal assaults than in other
categories of hate crime; over 47% of sexual orientation bias offenses
were violent assaults, in comparison to 31% for all hate crimes.
Nongovernmental monitors reported a substantial increase in 2007 of
violent attacks on LGBT people. The National Coalition of Anti-Violence
Programs (NCAVP) and more than thirty of its member organizations
across the country reported a 24 percent increase in incidents of
violence against LGBT people in 2007, compared to 2006. They noted that
murders more than doubled from 10 in 2006 to 21 in 2007.
In order for the U.S. government to more effectively address hate
crime, Human Rights First recommends the following (the complete list
of recommendations is below):
-
Congress should
pass and the President should sign the Local Law Enforcement Hate
Crimes Prevention Act (LLEHCPA) in order to provide support to local
law enforcement officials by facilitating federal involvement and
assistance. The LLEHCPA would also ensure that federal law covers the
full range of hate crime by adding sexual orientation, gender, gender
identity, and disability to the forms of discrimination already
included. -
The Department of
Justice should take steps to increase hate crime reporting by local
jurisdictions, targeting agencies that have not participated, have
underreported, or have reported zero hate crimes in the past.
Although there was a slight increase in the number of police
jurisdictions that took part in the reporting - an important step
toward an understanding of the full extent of the problem - the fact
that almost 15,500 (out of a total of 17,500) still don't report at all
or report zero hate crimes, suggest that these figures represent only a
portion of the actual number. For example, three hate crimes were
reported in Georgia and none were reported in Mississippi for 2007,
where the participating law enforcement agencies covered only 7% and
24% of the total population of the states, respectively.
-
Senior political
leaders and law enforcement officials at all levels of government
should condemn violent hate crimes, incitement to violence, and the
demonization of any community, including immigrants, regardless of
their status. -
The Department of
Justice and/or the Department of Homeland Security should study the
causes of increased bias-motivated violence against immigrants and
Hispanic Americans, and report publicly on the findings.
"The United States can show continued international leadership on
hate crimes by enhancing its response at home," added Stahnke. Human
Rights First's recent report on the United States is part of its 2008 Hate Crime Survey,
which concluded that incidents of violent hate crime targeting a number
of minority groups are increasing or occurring at historically high
levels in many of the 56 countries in Europe, North America, and the
former Soviet Union that comprise the Organization of Security and
Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), as governments fail to adequately combat
such crimes. That full report is available at: https://www.humanrightsfirst.org/discrimination/pages.aspx?id=157
Human Rights First is a non-profit, nonpartisan international human rights organization based in New York and Washington D.C. Human Rights First believes that building respect for human rights and the rule of law will help ensure the dignity to which every individual is entitled and will stem tyranny, extremism, intolerance, and violence.
LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and BrasÃlia's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular