Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Progressive Community
The press releases posted here have been submitted by
America's Progressive Community
For further information or to comment on this press release, please contact the organization directly.
Most Popular This Week
Today's Top News
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: ACLU Rachel Myers, (212) 549-2689 or 2666; media@aclu.org |
FISA Court Denies Public Access To Spy Law Proceedings
ACLU Criticizes Decision That Will Allow Constitutionality Of Government Surveillance To Be Decided In Secret
WASHINGTON - August 29 - In
a decision issued late Thursday, a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Court (FISC) judge denied a motion from the American Civil Liberties
Union seeking to bring a measure of transparency to the court's legal
review of the Bush administration's new spying law.
On July 10, less than two hours
after the president signed the FISA Amendments Act (FAA) into law, the
ACLU filed legal papers asking the FISC to ensure that any proceedings
it might conduct relating to the scope, meaning or constitutionality of
the FAA be open to the public to the extent possible. The ACLU also
asked the secret court to allow it to file a brief and participate in
oral arguments, to order the government to file a public version of its
briefs addressing the law's constitutionality and to publish any
judicial decision that is ultimately issued. The FISC oversees
intelligence surveillance, typically operates in secret and hears
arguments only from the government.
The following can be attributed to Jameel Jaffer, Director of the ACLU National Security Project:
"It's disappointing that the
intelligence court intends to adjudicate these important legal issues
in complete secrecy. The new surveillance law affects all of us because
it allows the executive branch virtually unfettered access to the
international telephone and email communications of U.S. citizens and
residents. The Bush administration says that the new law is necessary
to protect the country against terrorism, but there's nothing in the
law that prevents the government from monitoring the communications of
innocent Americans. Especially given the serious questions about the
new law's constitutionality, the court's consideration of these issues
should be adversarial and as transparent and informed as possible. The
intelligence court should not be deciding important constitutional
issues in secret judicial opinions issued after secret hearings at
which only the government is permitted to appear."
Thursday's FISC decision, which is signed by Judge Mary A. McLaughlin, is available here: www.aclu.org/safefree/
When the ACLU filed its motion with
the FISC, it also filed a separate legal challenge to the new law in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
More information about that legal challenge is available online at: www.aclu.org/faa

3 Comments so far
Show AllWell , lets get Obama elected, give him the executive septor, and get him to trash the Patriot act immediately. Both one and two.
We need the constitution put back in to being the law of the land.
Then lets rewrite and retool for fighting Terrorists, in a way that does not circumvent the constitution.
Other than doing just that, we are screwed, welcome to America, where lawyers are powerless, law enforcement and judges control everything.
Congressmen have given away their power and can be replaced by whim.
And the Presidency is a dictatorship.
BorFreeMen
WHY didnt he just vote against it in the first place?? Alot of his fellow senators did! Letting him get away with it and then puttin tghim in ofice to fixs it is absurd to the exttreme. We are stuck with it, folks, thansk to the cowards in DC!
Oh sure,
Let's get Obama elected because he voted in favor of Bush's Patriot Act (but he just had to do that to get elected).
And let's get Obama elected because he voted to give the telecoms immunity for the government's illegal spying program, directed at US citizens (but he just had to do that to get elected).
Let's get Obama elected because he voted against putting a 35% cap on interest corporations can charge poor people, the only ones who get those high interest rate loans (but he just had to do that to get elected).
Or we could vote for McCain who talks of endless war (but he just has to do that to get elected).
Poor saps. Both are in the same boat (a boat called "duopoly") They can't say or do what is really deep down in their honest, kind hearts, like we can. They're condemned forever to usurping the civil rights of Americans, killing innocent people (Iraqis, Afghanis), filling the pockets of the already filthy rich, and concentrating power into fewer and fewer hands. sigh. My heart goes out to both of them.
We can help these poor souls out of the politics that bind them. We can show them once and for all that "doing these things" will not get them elected. Yes we can!
VOTE NADER, 08