Common Dreams NewsCenter

We Can't Do It Without You!
 

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search

Home > Progressive Community > NewsWire > For Immediate Release
   
Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
   
Amnesty International USA

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
MARCH 27, 2006
10:27 AM

CONTACT: Amnesty International USA
Sharon Singh , 202-544-0200, ext. 289 or ssingh@aiusa.org

 
Pentagon's Considering Rule Change on Evidence Obtained by Torture Just Prior to Hamdan Case is Disingenuous at Best
 

WASHINGTON - March 27 - Amnesty International USA Executive Director Dr. William F. Schulz released the following statement in response to the Pentagon's proposed new rule barring the use of any evidence obtained by torture in military commission hearings on the eve of Hamdan v Rumsfeld at the U.S. Supreme Court:

"A rule change banning the use of evidence obtained by torture would be a positive development and brings the Pentagon closer to compliance with Article 15 of the Convention Against Torture, signed and ratified by the United States. However, the devil remains in the details. Without subsequent rules of evidence barring hearsay testimony or testimony by anonymous witnesses, it will be very difficult to determine how evidence was obtained.

"Under no circumstances should any criminal proceeding admit any evidence gained through torture. The military commissions, as flawed as they are, should have addressed this basic issue at their inception. For four years, the commission rules have been silent regarding this issue, which suggests willingness, if not desire, to use such evidence in military proceedings.

"Hamdan v Rumsfeld challenges the fairness and legality of the military commissions. One of the key impediments to a fair trial raised by the Hamdan legal team is admissibility of evidence obtained by torture. For the Pentagon to now say that it is considering barring the use of any evidence obtained by torture on the eve of this Supreme Court case appears disingenuous at best.

"The reality that the Pentagon can change rules at any given moment, even for the better, speaks to the underlying unfairness of a system that can only be described as a moving target. Trying to defend the accused in the current system is like walking in quicksand -- impossible to get a foothold. There is nothing that would prohibit the United States government from retracting any new rule."

"The Supreme Court faces an enormous responsibility in the Hamdan case. At stake are principles of fair trial, constitutionality and equality before the law -- basic values on which the entire U.S. legal system is based. Amnesty International will be watching the Supreme Court case with great interest, while continuing to call for the end to the military commissions and the closure of the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay altogether. The U.S. government should now take this opportunity to show its commitment to international human rights standards and abolish trials by military commission at Guantanamo and revoke the Military Order that created them."

###

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
Common Dreams NewsCenter is a non-profit news service
providing breaking news and views for the Progressive Community.

The press release posted here has been provided to Common Dreams NewsWire by one of the many progressive organizations who make up America's Progressive Community. If you wish to comment on this press release or would like more information, please contact the organization directly.
*all times Eastern US (GMT-5:00)

Making News?
Read our Guidelines for Submitting News Releases

CommonDreams.org is an Internet-based progressive news and grassroots activism organization, founded in 1997.
We are a nonprofit, progressive, independent and nonpartisan organization.

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search

To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.


www.commondreams.org