Common Dreams NewsCenter

We Can't Do It Without You!

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search

Home > Progressive Community > NewsWire > For Immediate Release
Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article

JANUARY 10, 2006
6:09 PM

CONTACT: People for the American Way
Nick Berning or Josh Glasstetter
202-467-4999 /

Alito Fails to Meet Burden on First Day of Testimony

WASHINGTON - January 10 - Samuel Alito entered his confirmation hearings with the burden of repudiating his record of extremism on privacy, civil rights, presidential power, and federalism. Instead, said People For the American Way President Ralph G Neas, Alito evaded questions, tried to distance himself from his positions without disavowing them, and reinforced concerns raised about his record.

“I would not have thought it possible for a nominee to be more evasive than John Roberts,” said Neas, “but on crucial questions about privacy, reproductive choice, and limits on presidential power, Samuel Alito is trying hard to leave Americans in the dark about what kind of justice he will be.”

Neas said a number of Democratic senators had raised excellent questions about the extremism of Alito’s record and legal views, questions that were not resolved by the efforts of Alito and his supporters to explain away some hard facts about his record, including:

  • A study by University of Chicago law professor Cass Sunstein found that 91 percent of his dissents take positions more conservative than do his colleagues on the appeals court, including colleagues appointed by Presidents Bush and Reagan.
  • When there is a conflict between institutions and individual rights, Alito’s dissents argue against individual rights 84 percent of the time. Alito advocated positions detrimental to civil rights 85 percent of the time.

“I believe we will see even more sharply focused questions from senators in their second round, given Judge Alito’s testimony today,” Neas said.

On the topic of Alito’s membership in the reactionary “Concerned Alumni of Princeton,” Alito “was just not credible,” said Neas. “How could someone brag about membership in a group that was designed to stir controversy and then deny knowing it was controversial?” Neas noted that CAP was notorious for its inflammatory rhetoric opposing the increasing racial and gender diversity on campus and its hostility to gay and lesbian students, and that Princeton alums Bill Bradley and Bill Frist had both sharply criticized the group.

“Today’s testimony confirmed that there is no doubt that replacing Sandra Day O’Connor with Samuel Alito would shift the Supreme Court far to the right,” said Neas. “Americans cannot count on Samuel Alito to uphold their rights and legal protections.”


Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
Common Dreams NewsCenter is a non-profit news service
providing breaking news and views for the Progressive Community.

The press release posted here has been provided to Common Dreams NewsWire by one of the many progressive organizations who make up America's Progressive Community. If you wish to comment on this press release or would like more information, please contact the organization directly.
*all times Eastern US (GMT-5:00)

Making News?
Read our Guidelines for Submitting News Releases is an Internet-based progressive news and grassroots activism organization, founded in 1997.
We are a nonprofit, progressive, independent and nonpartisan organization.

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search

To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.