|
WASHINGTON - July 18 - Statement of Peter Lurie, MD, MPH, Deputy Director, Public Citizens Health Research Group The decision by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to approve the Vagus Nerve Stimulator (VNS) for treatment-resistant depression is one of its most questionable regulatory decisions made by the agency in recent memory. As a consequence of the FDAs data-free decisionmaking, hundreds of thousands of patients with severe depression are likely to undergo surgery to implant a device that has not been proved to work. This device was a resounding failure in its main clinical trial. And the other main analysis by Cyberonics Inc., the devices manufacturer, was deemed highly questionable by the FDAs statistical reviewer. No adequately controlled long-term trials have addressed the FDA reviewers safety concerns, which stem from cases of worsening depression, suicide and sudden death among patients who received the device. Devices for which medical claims are made should meet the same approval criteria as drugs. In effect, the FDA has lowered the approval bar for this device. There is simply no convincing evidence that this device works. Until and unless such data are generated, patients are better off without this device. VNS is an electronic device implanted surgically at the base of the neck that sends pulses of electricity into the brain and elsewhere in the body every five minutes. It was deemed not-approvable by the FDA in August 2004 due to a lack of convincing evidence that the device is effective and concerns that it may actually worsen depression in some patients. However, in the absence of substantially new data, the FDA reversed its position and on Friday approved the device. In May, The Wall Street Journal reported that the Senate Finance Committee was examining the FDAs handling of Cyberonics application. ###
|