Common Dreams NewsCenter

We Can't Do It Without You!
 

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search

Home > Progressive Community > NewsWire > For Immediate Release
   
Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
   
Institute for Public Accuracy
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
MARCH 29, 2005
1:54 PM
CONTACT: Institute for Public Accuracy 
Sam Husseini, 202-347-0020
ipa@accuracy.org
 
The Future of Copyright in the Internet Era
 

WASHINGTON -- March 29 -- Today, the Supreme Court is hearing arguments in the case of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios v. Grokster. The case raises questions about
the nature of copyright in the age of the Internet. The following are available for interviews:

DEAN BAKER, http://www.cepr.net/publications/AFV.htm Co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, Baker wrote the paper "The Artistic Freedom Voucher: Internet Age Alternative to Copyrights," which outlines a system that "would allow each individual to contribute a refundable tax credit of approximately $100 to a creative worker of their choice" as an alternative to copyright.

He said today: "Copyrights are a relic of the feudal guild system that has long outlived its usefulness. We have far more efficient mechanisms for promoting creativity and innovation in the modern economy. For example, the Artistic Freedom Voucher system could provide a greater pool of money to support to creative and innovative work, with less government interference than the copyright system. Instead of trying to adjust its business model to the Internet Age, the entertainment industry is playing the role of 21st century Luddites by trying to suppress technology in order to preserve its old-fashioned business methods."

SIVA VAIDHYANATHAN, http://sivacracy.net Vaidhyanathan is author of the books "Copyrights and Copywrongs" and "The Anarchist in the Library." He said today: "In 1984, the Supreme Court ruled that insofar as technology was concerned, hands off is the best policy the government could pursue. As a result of the court's ruling in
the Betamax case we saw the flourishing of the VCR. That ruling not only changed the way we experience media and opened up new markets for video, it granted confidence to inventors. If the Supreme Court rules differently in the Grokster case, it could scare away an entire generation of creative engineers. Technologies like Grokster are simply search engines using the peer-to-peer nature of the Internet. If you have a problem with peer to peer, you have a problem with the Internet. The question is: Do the interests of the big Hollywood studios trump the interests of everybody else on the Internet? If that's the case we're in for a lot of trouble."

Vaidhyanathan, who is assistant professor in the Department of Culture and Communication at New York University, added: "There are legitimate copyright issues and they should be pursued in civil court. But enforcing it at the level of the technology is not appropriate. It would do more harm than good."

###

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
Common Dreams NewsCenter is a non-profit news service
providing breaking news and views for the Progressive Community.

The press release posted here has been provided to Common Dreams NewsWire by one of the many progressive organizations who make up America's Progressive Community. If you wish to comment on this press release or would like more information, please contact the organization directly.
*all times Eastern US (GMT-5:00)

Making News?
Read our Guidelines for Submitting News Releases

CommonDreams.org is an Internet-based progressive news and grassroots activism organization, founded in 1997.
We are a nonprofit, progressive, independent and nonpartisan organization.

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search

To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.


www.commondreams.org