Common Dreams NewsCenter

We Can't Do It Without You!

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search

Home > Progressive Community > NewsWire > For Immediate Release
Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
MADRE, An International Women’s Human Rights Organization
JANUARY 28, 2005
5:45 PM
CONTACT: MADRE, An International Women’s Human Rights Organization 
Yifat Susskind, Associate Director
212-627-0444 email:
A Vote for Freedom or for Occupation? The Iraqi Elections and Women’s Human Rights

WASHINGTON -- January 28 -- Much has been made of the fact that 25 percent of the candidates running in Iraq’s January 30 elections are women. Comparisons between Iraq’s new National Assembly and the US Congress (which is only 15 percent women) are used to imply that Iraq’s elections mark the dawn of a new era, as though the fact of women in politics is itself evidence of “freedom”. But just as Condoleezza Rice has only undermined women’s rights around the world, the women elected to Iraq’s new National Assembly—one of whom spoke at the Republican National Convention last August—will be there not to advocate for women, but to carry out US policy in Iraq. Gender-based quotas, like elections themselves, are procedural: an aspect of democratization, but no guarantee of democracy. In fact, the illegal and ongoing US occupation of Iraq precludes the possibility of democratic elections. As for women occupying a quarter of the National Assembly seats, 25 percent of a puppet government is still a puppet government.

The Election Boycott

  • Iraq’s elections were planned, organized, and financed by the US in violation of the 1907 Hague Convention, which forbids an occupying power from creating permanent changes in the government of the occupied territory.
  • Recognizing that elections without sovereignty cannot be democratic, many Iraqis have chosen to boycott the election, which they see as a mechanism for legitimizing the occupation.
  • Most of Iraq's Sunni Muslim population—a third of the country—will boycott. Sunni leaders offered to cancel the boycott if the US would set a date to withdraw from Iraq, but the US refused to do so.
  • It’s not only Sunni “insurgents” who are opposing the election. Calls for a boycott have been issued by Iraqi religious, political, and civil society leaders from across the political spectrum, including progressive human rights and women’s organizations. The most widespread rationale for a boycott is that conditions for free and fair elections have not been met.

Voting Under Fire

  • Ongoing violence has skewed the election in numerous ways. Election workers have been killed and poll sites bombed. Candidates have been assassinated. Militants have threatened to behead anyone who tries to vote. Because of the threat of violence, there will be little international oversight or monitoring of the election.
  • These campaign conditions strongly favor candidates already known to the public; namely, those whom the US appointed to the first interim government.
  • Women candidates, in particular, have been attacked by fundamentalists. After the murder of at least one woman candidate and repeated assassination attempts against others, most women ran in secret (a choice made possible by a system in which voters pick among party slates, not individual candidates).
  • With many candidates unable to campaign publicly, much of the population—particularly women in rural areas who do not read—lacks the information needed to make an informed choice on election day.
  • The US military has played down the impact of violence on the election, announcing that residents of only four of Iraq’s 18 provinces may not be able to take part. But as journalist Robert Fisk pointed out recently, those four provinces (including the capital, Baghdad) contain more than half of the population.

Why are the elections important for Iraqi women?

  • While the new National Assembly may not have legitimacy, it will have political power—at least within the bounds set by the US.
  • The interim government will draft a new Iraqi constitution, which could either codify or disregard the rights of women and religious and ethnic minorities. For example, the constitution will govern issues critical to women’s human rights, including divorce, inheritance, child custody, freedom to choose whether and whom to marry, and freedom to travel without a male chaperone.
  • The inclusion of women in the National Assembly may help ensure that rights related to these issues are recognized under the constitution.
  • But only rights that are compatible with US aims in Iraq will be enacted. Iraqi women’s internationally recognized legal rights to self-determination, freedom from violence, an adequate standard of living, health care, education, and many other human rights will continue to be violated as violence induced by the US occupation continues and Iraq is turned into the world’s most extreme "free market" state.
  • Moreover, because human rights are interdependent, even those rights which may be recognized in the constitution will be difficult to exercise. For example, criminalization of domestic violence and a legal right to divorce are severely compromised in an economy where women are denied access to decent housing, jobs, daycare, or health services.
  • Ultimately, Iraq’s new constitution—like the government that drafts it—will lack legitimacy, both under international law and in the eyes of a large part of the Iraqi population, because neither democracy nor women’s human rights can be advanced at gunpoint.

MADRE in Iraq

In Iraq, MADRE partners with the Organization of Women's Freedom in Iraq (OWFI). OWFI is fighting for women’s human rights in an Iraq torn apart by US military occupation and rising Islamic fundamentalism. OWFI calls for an immediate end to US military occupation and the establishment of a free and secular state in Iraq. MADRE has supported OWFI in their work to construct women’s shelters in Baghdad, Kirkuk, and Erbil which now provide a safe haven for women in Iraq’s current environment of violence.

MADRE is an international women's human rights organization that works in partnership with women's community-based groups in conflict areas worldwide. Our programs address issues of armed conflict and forced displacement; women's health and reproductive rights; economic justice and community development; Indigenous Peoples' rights and resources, food security and sustainable development; human rights advocacy; youth; and US foreign policy. MADRE provides resources and training to enable our sister organizations to meet immediate needs in their communities and develop long-term solutions to the crises they face. Since we began in 1983, MADRE has delivered over 21 million dollars worth of support to community-based women's groups in Latin America, the Caribbean, the Middle East, Africa, the Balkans, South Asia and the United States. Interviews Available.


Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
Common Dreams NewsCenter is a non-profit news service
providing breaking news and views for the Progressive Community.

The press release posted here has been provided to Common Dreams NewsWire by one of the many progressive organizations who make up America's Progressive Community. If you wish to comment on this press release or would like more information, please contact the organization directly.
*all times Eastern US (GMT-5:00)

Making News?
Read our Guidelines for Submitting News Releases is an Internet-based progressive news and grassroots activism organization, founded in 1997.
We are a nonprofit, progressive, independent and nonpartisan organization.

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search

To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.