Common Dreams NewsCenter

We Can't Do It Without You!
 

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search

Home > Progressive Community > NewsWire > For Immediate Release
   
Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
   
MoveOn.org
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
JULY 2, 2004
 11:22 AM
CONTACT:  MoveOn.org
Jessica Smith, Steve Smith,
202-822-5200
 
Studies Reveal Holes in Port Security Safety Plans
 

WASHINGTON - July 2 - As the deadline for U.S. ships and ports to be in compliance with international security standards arrives this week, a GAO report finds that the Bush administration is not only ill-prepared for this week’s deadline, but is also ignoring Coast Guard estimates on the cost of port security. By allocating a fraction of what will be needed to protect America’s port towards proper security, and leaving many ports un-inspected by security officials, the administration is leaving the country open to possible attack.

Once again, the Bush administration is using “Homeland Security” merely as an election-year soundbite to frighten opponents and silence criticism, not a true budgetary priority, misleading the American public.

Two weeks ago, Homeland Security secretary Tom Ridge said that U.S. ports and ships were in “full compliance” with international security requirements that go into effect today.[1] A new report[2] by the non-partisan General Accounting Office (GAO) reveals that Ridge was mistaken.

According to the GAO, around seven percent of all U.S. ports and half of all ships have not even been reviewed by the federal government. The administration allowed industry groups to “self-certify to the Coast Guard that they were using appropriate standards.” But every security plan the Coast Guard did review “had deficiencies.” A GAO spokesman said he believed the plans that weren’t reviewed by the Coast Guard were also flawed.[3]

The failure to secure U.S. ports puts America at risk. But despite the Coast Guard’s estimate that it will take $7.5 billion over 10 years to secure ports from terrorist attacks, the Bush administration has requested just $46 million in funding for that purpose in 2005.[4]

For full citations and links to the cited documents, visit: http://www.misleader.org/

[1] Ridge: Seaports, ships meet security rules, CNN.com, 6/21/04

[2] Substantial Work Remains to Translate New Planning Requirements into Effective Port Security, GAO, 7/1/04

[3] Report: Ports, ships not in 'full compliance', CNN.com, 6/29/04

[4] Lack of funding slows port security measures, Boston Globe, 6/30/04

###

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
Common Dreams NewsCenter is a non-profit news service
providing breaking news and views for the Progressive Community.

The press release posted here has been provided to Common Dreams NewsWire by one of the many progressive organizations who make up America's Progressive Community. If you wish to comment on this press release or would like more information, please contact the organization directly.
*all times Eastern US (GMT-5:00)

Making News?
Read our Guidelines for Submitting News Releases

CommonDreams.org is an Internet-based progressive news and grassroots activism organization, founded in 1997.
We are a nonprofit, progressive, independent and nonpartisan organization.

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search

To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

© Copyrighted 1997-2009
www.commondreams.org