Common Dreams NewsCenter

 

 Home | NewswireAbout Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

Sierra Club
Home > Progressive Community > NewsWire > For Immediate Release     

 

 
Send this page to a friend
   
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
FEBRUARY 16, 2000
12:27 PM
CONTACT:  Sierra Club
Dan Weiss, political director, 202-675-6275;
Allen Mattison, press secretary, 202-675-7903
George W. Bush: The Polluters' Governor
 

WASHINGTON - February 16 -

TEXAS IS AMERICA'S MOST POLLUTED STATE

In 1999, Houston overtook Los Angeles as America's smoggiest city. Texas ranks first in toxic releases to the environment, first in total toxic air emissions from industrial facilities, first in toxic chemical accidents, and first in cancer-causing pollution.(1)

GOV. BUSH IS NOT FIGHTING TO CURB TEXAS'S POLLUTION

Federal laws such as the Clean Air Act are forcing industries to cut pollution, but air quality in Texas continues to decline.(2) Rather than adopting tough laws to reduce pollution from aging facilities, Gov. George W. Bush asked industry to draft their own regulations to pre-empt legislative action. After a briefing by the industry insiders who wrote the plan, DuPont official Jim Kennedy noted that the voluntary industry proposal, had "no `meat' with respect to actual emissions reductions. One of the [business] leaders actually stated that emissions reductions was not a primary driver for the program."(3)

The result of Bush's voluntary policy has been that only 15 percent of the 760 so-called "grandfathered" plants have signed up for the voluntary program.(4) According to the Dallas Morning News, "[Bush's] voluntary anti-pollution initiatives have produced only marginal improvements."(5)

When Time Magazine issued a report card on issues, Bush's pollution record received a D: "Bush let industry write an anti-pollution measure, and believes voluntary plans, not regulation, can clean up the air and water. No wonder Texas has a world-class pollution problem."(6)

BUSH APPOINTEES THREATEN OUR ENVIRONMENT

In Texas, Bush appointed oil and petrochemical executives to the state's environmental agency, leading to restrictions on citizen participation in pollution permitting and weaker enforcement. Six times, the TNRCC has been brought to court for denying public hearings-- and the TNRCC has lost every time.(7)

One of Bush's environmental advisors, Terry L. Anderson, advocates selling all our public land. In Anderson's blueprint for auctioning off all public lands, he wrote; "`What special provisions, if any, should the divestiture plan make for the Grand Canyon and similar National Parks, monuments, forests, and wilderness areas?' [Anderson] asks. `One possibility would be to specify no restrictions at all.'"(8)

BUSH SPEWS ENVIRONMENTAL RHETORIC...

"You've got to ask the question, `Is the air cleaner since I became governor?' And the answer is yes." -- Gov. Bush, press conference, May, 1999 As quoted in The Washington Post, October 15, 1999

...BUT TEXANS KNOW THE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTS

"Despite roars of approval from the campaign trail, Gov. George W. Bush has a potential Achilles' heel for his trek to the White House: his environmental record." -- San Antonio Express-News editorial, October 24, 1999

"The environment is developing as a potent political issue for the 2000 presidential race. Much of the reason has to do with Mr. Bush's vulnerability on the issue. Seven Texas metropolises... either exceed the federal standards for lung-scorching ozone or are on the verge of doing so." -- Dallas Morning News editorial, November 14, 1999

TEXAS AIR POLLUTION:

Under Gov. Bush, Texas's air has gotten dirtier, not cleaner. For the majority of Texans, air quality has substantially diminished under the Bush Administration. Two-thirds of Texans-- 12 million people-- live in the state's top eight urban areas. From 1990-94, they suffered 508 eight-hour ozone violations, from 1995-99 under Bush, this jumped to 679 violations, a 34% increase.(9)

In 1999 this pollution led to Houston passing Los Angeles to claim the dubious title as the nation's smoggiest city. And it's not just the number of days -- it's also the intensity. On Houston's smoggiest day, the air was nearly 50 percent dirtier than the air on Los Angeles's smoggiest day.(10) In addition, a 1999 City of Houston study shows that air pollution alone may have caused at least 435 premature deaths and as many as 1,196 new cases of chronic bronchitis annually.(11)

Bush inherited a solution, yet he exacerbated the problem. The Houston Chronicle reports that from 1987 through 1994, "despite continuing population and economic growth," the air in Houston became cleaner due to "the introduction of new pollution controls." However, since 1994, when Bush was elected governor, the number of smoggy days has increased by 20 percent.(12)

In 1999, Texas suffered seven of the nation's 10 highest one-hour ozone levels, and 15 of the top 30.(13)

TEXAS WATER POLLUTION:

Texas leads the nation in the number of factories violating clean water standards.(14)

The state ranks third in the nation for surface water discharges, dumping nearly 21 million pounds of toxic chemicals into streams, ponds and surface water. The U.S. EPA found swimming impaired in 27 percent of Texas rivers; 5 percent do not support aquatic life.(15)

Texas leads the nation in injecting toxic waste into underground wells, disposing 60 percent more toxic waste into injection wells than any other state.(16) Injecting toxic waste into the ground can potentially poison local drinking water supplies.

On January 1, 1995, only one Texas body of water had a fish ban triggered by high levels of mercury. By January 1, 1999, that number had soared to 7.(17)

BUSH'S ENVIRONMENTAL SPIN AND THE FACTS:

SPIN: "Texas leads the nation in reducing toxics by 44 percent in the last decade. Governor Bush was the first governor in Texas history to say to older, grandfathered unpermitted plants: It's time to clean up." -- Scott McClellan, Bush Campaign Spokesman Fort-Worth Star-Telegram, October 20, 1999

FACT: Texas has reduced toxic chemicals emissions at about the same rate as the national average due to the Federal Clean Air Act of 1990.(18) As the Dallas Morning News said, "[Bush's] irrefutable claim that toxic emissions are down owes to measures the federal government put in place before he became governor."(19)

Yet, despite the benefits the Clean Air Act has had on Texas, Bush's appointees have attempted to weaken the law. According to the Boston Globe, "[E]ven as the administration of Governor George W. Bush talks about tough actions, Texas lobbyists are trying to seriously weaken one of the US Environmental Protection Agency's strongest tools to prod states to clear the air: the power to stop highway construction in polluted areas."(20)

SPIN: "Mr. Bush said the best way to achieve clean air and water was `to work with local jurisdictions using market-based solutions and not try to sue our way or regulate our way to clean air and clean water.'" -- New York Times, November 9, 1999

FACT: Bush's actions led to one of the biggest environmental lawsuits in state history when he killed an auto inspection and maintenance plan for Houston in 1995. His actions broke a state contract with Tejas Testing, which sued Texas and won $136 million. The money came from funds intended for environmental enforcement and higher education.(21)

SPIN: "Texans agree with Governor Bush's reasonable and balanced approach toward protecting our environment, which has resulted in a 10 percent reduction in industrial pollution, Texas leading the nation in reducing toxics, and legislation that will reduce emissions by 250,000 tons per year." -- Mindy Tucker, Bush Campaign Spokeswoman Houston Chronicle, October 20, 1999

FACT: Texans do not agree with the Bush approach. In an editorial, the San Antonio Express-News criticized Bush's pollution scheme: "Bush refused to back legislation (which failed) that would have forced Texas' oldest, dirtiest power plants to clean up. Instead, the governor backed voluntary measures, asking owners of the air-polluting plants to clean themselves up. Few have, nor will they without a regulatory stick to make them do it."(22)

For further information on George W. Bush's environmental record, please read, "The Polluters' President?" from Sierra Magazine: http://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/199911/bush.frame.html

###

DOCUMENTATION

1. a) Texas ranks first in toxic releases to the environment (US EPA Toxics Release Inventory Database, 1990-97); b) first in total toxic air emissions from industrial facilities (US EPA Toxics Release Inventory Database, 1990-97); c) first in toxic chemical accidents (Compiled from EPA Emergency Response Notification System database); and d) first in cancer-causing pollution (US EPA Toxics Release Inventory Database, 1990-97 using the EDF website <scorecard.org> to research the data).

2. 1-hour ozone violations jumped to 321 in 1995-99 from 309 in 1990-94. (Ozone data from the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission website, City of Houston's Bureau of Air Quality, NESCAUM's website on US ozone data, US EPA AIRS database).

3. Sierra Magazine, November/December 1999

4. TNRCC data as reported in by the Christian Science Monitor, November 12, 1999.

5. "Cleaning the Air," editorial, Dallas Morning News, November 14, 1999.

6. "Bush in Texas," Time Magazine, February 21, 2000

7. Excerpt from: "For Bush, `green' is a subtle hue," Christian Science Monitor, November 12, 1999, "All three of Bush's appointees to the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, which regulates industrial emissions and water quality, come from the oil and petrochemical industry. The result is that of 79 public requests for hearings from 1996-99, 63 were denied.

8. "Sunday In The Loop: Coming Soon: Grand Canyon Inc.," Washington Post, January 30, 2000.

9. Ozone data from the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission website, City of Houston's Bureau of Air Quality, NESCAUM's website on US ozone data, US EPA AIRS database.

10. EPA and TNRCC data based on EPA's "Guideline for Reporting of Air Quality--Air Quality Index (AQI)"

11. Study by the City of Houston as reported by the Houston Chronicle, May 4, 1999.

12. "Houston faces ozone deadline," Houston Chronicle, January 9, 2000

13. 1999 ozone data from the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission website, City of Houston's Bureau of Air Quality, NESCAUM's website on US ozone data, US EPA AIRS database.

14. EPA Permit Compliance System data, compiled by U.S. Public Interest Research Group, 1999.

15. EPA Toxics Release Inventory Database, 1990-97.

16. EPA Toxics Release Inventory Database, 1990-97. The next highest state, Louisiana, injects 52 million pounds of toxic waste into injunction wells, while Texas injects 83 million pounds.

17. Texas Department of Health. High mercury levels are generally tied to air emissions, particularly from coal powered electric generating plants. The bodies of water in Texas with mercury advisories are in the rea of coal plants. The body of water witha ban (LaVaca Bay) was polluted by direct industrial discharge.

18. The rate of reductions in Texas of total air emissions of chemicals on the Toxics Release Inventory is roughly the same as the rest of the country. From 1990-97, Texas emissions fell 40.3% vs. 43.3% for the rest of the country.

19. "Cleaning the Air," editorial, Dallas Morning News, November 14, 1999.

20. "Reconciling Air and Car in the Lone Star State," Boston Globe, December 16, 1999.

21. Tejas Testing won $136.8 million, Dallas Morning News, April 5, 1997.

22. "Bush Must Improve Environmental Record," editorial, San Antonio Express-News, October 24, 1999.

###

 
Common Dreams NewsCenter is a non-profit news service
providing breaking news and views for the Progressive Community.

The press release posted here has been provided to Common Dreams NewsWire by one of the many progressive organizations who make up America's Progressive Community. If you wish to comment on this press release or would like more information, please contact the organization directly.
*all times Eastern US (GMT-5:00)

Making News?
Read our Guidelines for Submitting News Releases

Tell Us What You Think: editor@commondreams.org

© Copyright 1997-2003 Common Dreams.
www.commondreams.org