The report warns that the coronavirus pandemic is set to make things worse for the poorest people in the world. (Photo: AFP/Getty Images)
Jul 07, 2020
The former United Nations special rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights on Sunday released his final report, a scathing denunciation of global efforts to combat extreme poverty and a warning that the hurdles in front of such efforts will not disappear when the Covid-19 pandemic is finally brought under control.
"Even before Covid-19, we squandered a decade in the fight against poverty, with misplaced triumphalism blocking the very reforms that could have prevented the worst impacts of the pandemic," Philip Alston, who stepped down from his position as rapporteur in May, said in a statement.
Alston's final report (pdf) excoriates world leaders for using what he describes in the report as "the World Bank's flawed international poverty line" as a measure of poverty. The bank's poverty line, the report says, is based on purchasing power and represents a universal measure that is insufficient to address changes from society to society, does not allow for gender inequality or different family resource allocations of resources, and under-represents marginalized groups whose data is difficult to track.
"The line is scandalously unambitious, and the best evidence shows it doesn't even cover the cost of food or housing in many countries," said Alston. "The poverty decline it purports to show is due largely to rising incomes in a single country, China. And it obscures poverty among women and those often excluded from official surveys, such as migrant workers and refugees."
"The result is a Pyrrhic victory, an undue sense of immense satisfaction, and dangerous complacency," Alston continued. "Using more realistic measures, the extent of global poverty is vastly higher and the trends extremely discouraging."
The report warns that the coronavirus pandemic is set to make things worse:
If social protection floors had been in place, the hundreds of millions left without medical care, adequate food and housing, and basic security would have been spared some of the worst consequences. Instead, endless pressures to promote fiscal consolidation, especially over the last decade, have pushed social protection systems closer towards nineteenth century models rather than late twentieth century aspirations. When combined with the next generation of post-Covid-19 austerity policies, the dramatic transfer of economic and political power to the wealthy elites that has characterized the past forty years will accelerate, at which point the extent and depth of global poverty will be even more politically unsustainable and explosive.
Rather than a continuation of austerity and other inequality-fueling policies, Alston said, world governments must choose a different path.
"It's time for a new approach to poverty eradication that tackles inequality, embraces redistribution, and takes tax justice seriously," he said. "Poverty is a political choice and it will be with us until its elimination is reconceived as a matter of social justice."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The former United Nations special rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights on Sunday released his final report, a scathing denunciation of global efforts to combat extreme poverty and a warning that the hurdles in front of such efforts will not disappear when the Covid-19 pandemic is finally brought under control.
"Even before Covid-19, we squandered a decade in the fight against poverty, with misplaced triumphalism blocking the very reforms that could have prevented the worst impacts of the pandemic," Philip Alston, who stepped down from his position as rapporteur in May, said in a statement.
Alston's final report (pdf) excoriates world leaders for using what he describes in the report as "the World Bank's flawed international poverty line" as a measure of poverty. The bank's poverty line, the report says, is based on purchasing power and represents a universal measure that is insufficient to address changes from society to society, does not allow for gender inequality or different family resource allocations of resources, and under-represents marginalized groups whose data is difficult to track.
"The line is scandalously unambitious, and the best evidence shows it doesn't even cover the cost of food or housing in many countries," said Alston. "The poverty decline it purports to show is due largely to rising incomes in a single country, China. And it obscures poverty among women and those often excluded from official surveys, such as migrant workers and refugees."
"The result is a Pyrrhic victory, an undue sense of immense satisfaction, and dangerous complacency," Alston continued. "Using more realistic measures, the extent of global poverty is vastly higher and the trends extremely discouraging."
The report warns that the coronavirus pandemic is set to make things worse:
If social protection floors had been in place, the hundreds of millions left without medical care, adequate food and housing, and basic security would have been spared some of the worst consequences. Instead, endless pressures to promote fiscal consolidation, especially over the last decade, have pushed social protection systems closer towards nineteenth century models rather than late twentieth century aspirations. When combined with the next generation of post-Covid-19 austerity policies, the dramatic transfer of economic and political power to the wealthy elites that has characterized the past forty years will accelerate, at which point the extent and depth of global poverty will be even more politically unsustainable and explosive.
Rather than a continuation of austerity and other inequality-fueling policies, Alston said, world governments must choose a different path.
"It's time for a new approach to poverty eradication that tackles inequality, embraces redistribution, and takes tax justice seriously," he said. "Poverty is a political choice and it will be with us until its elimination is reconceived as a matter of social justice."
The former United Nations special rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights on Sunday released his final report, a scathing denunciation of global efforts to combat extreme poverty and a warning that the hurdles in front of such efforts will not disappear when the Covid-19 pandemic is finally brought under control.
"Even before Covid-19, we squandered a decade in the fight against poverty, with misplaced triumphalism blocking the very reforms that could have prevented the worst impacts of the pandemic," Philip Alston, who stepped down from his position as rapporteur in May, said in a statement.
Alston's final report (pdf) excoriates world leaders for using what he describes in the report as "the World Bank's flawed international poverty line" as a measure of poverty. The bank's poverty line, the report says, is based on purchasing power and represents a universal measure that is insufficient to address changes from society to society, does not allow for gender inequality or different family resource allocations of resources, and under-represents marginalized groups whose data is difficult to track.
"The line is scandalously unambitious, and the best evidence shows it doesn't even cover the cost of food or housing in many countries," said Alston. "The poverty decline it purports to show is due largely to rising incomes in a single country, China. And it obscures poverty among women and those often excluded from official surveys, such as migrant workers and refugees."
"The result is a Pyrrhic victory, an undue sense of immense satisfaction, and dangerous complacency," Alston continued. "Using more realistic measures, the extent of global poverty is vastly higher and the trends extremely discouraging."
The report warns that the coronavirus pandemic is set to make things worse:
If social protection floors had been in place, the hundreds of millions left without medical care, adequate food and housing, and basic security would have been spared some of the worst consequences. Instead, endless pressures to promote fiscal consolidation, especially over the last decade, have pushed social protection systems closer towards nineteenth century models rather than late twentieth century aspirations. When combined with the next generation of post-Covid-19 austerity policies, the dramatic transfer of economic and political power to the wealthy elites that has characterized the past forty years will accelerate, at which point the extent and depth of global poverty will be even more politically unsustainable and explosive.
Rather than a continuation of austerity and other inequality-fueling policies, Alston said, world governments must choose a different path.
"It's time for a new approach to poverty eradication that tackles inequality, embraces redistribution, and takes tax justice seriously," he said. "Poverty is a political choice and it will be with us until its elimination is reconceived as a matter of social justice."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.