"We should be protecting communities, our democracy, and the environment, not tearing these things apart as Trump hoped to do," said Gloria Smith, attorney with the Sierra Club. (Photo: Mani Albrecht/U.S. Border Patrol/Flickr)
Jun 26, 2020
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals handed President Donald Trump another rebuke Friday by ruling that the administration's efforts to redirect previously appropriated Pentagon funds towards his border wall was an unlawful violation of the Constitution.
"These funds were appropriated for other purposes, and the transfer amounted to 'drawing funds from the Treasury without authorization by statute and thus violating the Appropriations Clause,'" wrote Chief U.S. Circuit Judge Sidney Thomas in the majority opinion."Therefore, the transfer of funds here was unlawful."
"Trump's xenophobic wall is already leveling protected lands, desecrating cultural sites, and destroying wildlife. There's no undoing the damage that's been done, but we will be back before the Supreme Court to finally put a stop to this destructive wall."
--Dror Ladin, ACLUAccording to the 2 to 1 decision authored by Thomas, "the border wall was not an unforeseen military requirement, and that funding for the wall had been denied by Congress. Absent such statutory authority, the Executive Branch lacked independent constitutional authority to transfer the funds at issue here."
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, among those who have challenged the legality of Trump's redirection of the funds, welcomed the decision, saying the "court reminded the president--once again--that no one is above the law."
The ruling came in a lawsuit, Sierra Club v. Trump, which was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of the Sierra Club and Southern Border Communities Coalition. Though the Trump administration is certain to appeal the ruling, the ACLU said the court's decision was a clear vindication for the merits of the legal challenge brought.
"This ruling is a win for the rule of law, the environment, and border communities," Dror Ladin, staff attorney with the ACLU's National Security Project, said in a statement. "President Trump's xenophobic wall is already leveling protected lands, desecrating cultural sites, and destroying wildlife. There's no undoing the damage that's been done, but we will be back before the Supreme Court to finally put a stop to this destructive wall."
\u201cBIG WIN: 9th Circuit ruled against Trump's unconstitutional syphoning of military funds to build his vanity wall. This is a victory for border communities & for democracy. We & our partners @ACLU & @SierraClub are stopping Trump in his tracks. https://t.co/C3Vzylnon2\u201d— SBCC (@SBCC) 1593197508
Gloria Smith, managing attorney at the Sierra Club, applauded the ruling as "monumental for our border communities and desert wildlands" the stretch along the U.S.-Mexico border.
"We should be protecting communities, our democracy, and the environment, not tearing these things apart as Trump hoped to do," said Smith. "We rise with border communities to stop this administration from further inflicting its relentless agenda-- harming the people and places we know and love."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals handed President Donald Trump another rebuke Friday by ruling that the administration's efforts to redirect previously appropriated Pentagon funds towards his border wall was an unlawful violation of the Constitution.
"These funds were appropriated for other purposes, and the transfer amounted to 'drawing funds from the Treasury without authorization by statute and thus violating the Appropriations Clause,'" wrote Chief U.S. Circuit Judge Sidney Thomas in the majority opinion."Therefore, the transfer of funds here was unlawful."
"Trump's xenophobic wall is already leveling protected lands, desecrating cultural sites, and destroying wildlife. There's no undoing the damage that's been done, but we will be back before the Supreme Court to finally put a stop to this destructive wall."
--Dror Ladin, ACLUAccording to the 2 to 1 decision authored by Thomas, "the border wall was not an unforeseen military requirement, and that funding for the wall had been denied by Congress. Absent such statutory authority, the Executive Branch lacked independent constitutional authority to transfer the funds at issue here."
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, among those who have challenged the legality of Trump's redirection of the funds, welcomed the decision, saying the "court reminded the president--once again--that no one is above the law."
The ruling came in a lawsuit, Sierra Club v. Trump, which was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of the Sierra Club and Southern Border Communities Coalition. Though the Trump administration is certain to appeal the ruling, the ACLU said the court's decision was a clear vindication for the merits of the legal challenge brought.
"This ruling is a win for the rule of law, the environment, and border communities," Dror Ladin, staff attorney with the ACLU's National Security Project, said in a statement. "President Trump's xenophobic wall is already leveling protected lands, desecrating cultural sites, and destroying wildlife. There's no undoing the damage that's been done, but we will be back before the Supreme Court to finally put a stop to this destructive wall."
\u201cBIG WIN: 9th Circuit ruled against Trump's unconstitutional syphoning of military funds to build his vanity wall. This is a victory for border communities & for democracy. We & our partners @ACLU & @SierraClub are stopping Trump in his tracks. https://t.co/C3Vzylnon2\u201d— SBCC (@SBCC) 1593197508
Gloria Smith, managing attorney at the Sierra Club, applauded the ruling as "monumental for our border communities and desert wildlands" the stretch along the U.S.-Mexico border.
"We should be protecting communities, our democracy, and the environment, not tearing these things apart as Trump hoped to do," said Smith. "We rise with border communities to stop this administration from further inflicting its relentless agenda-- harming the people and places we know and love."
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals handed President Donald Trump another rebuke Friday by ruling that the administration's efforts to redirect previously appropriated Pentagon funds towards his border wall was an unlawful violation of the Constitution.
"These funds were appropriated for other purposes, and the transfer amounted to 'drawing funds from the Treasury without authorization by statute and thus violating the Appropriations Clause,'" wrote Chief U.S. Circuit Judge Sidney Thomas in the majority opinion."Therefore, the transfer of funds here was unlawful."
"Trump's xenophobic wall is already leveling protected lands, desecrating cultural sites, and destroying wildlife. There's no undoing the damage that's been done, but we will be back before the Supreme Court to finally put a stop to this destructive wall."
--Dror Ladin, ACLUAccording to the 2 to 1 decision authored by Thomas, "the border wall was not an unforeseen military requirement, and that funding for the wall had been denied by Congress. Absent such statutory authority, the Executive Branch lacked independent constitutional authority to transfer the funds at issue here."
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, among those who have challenged the legality of Trump's redirection of the funds, welcomed the decision, saying the "court reminded the president--once again--that no one is above the law."
The ruling came in a lawsuit, Sierra Club v. Trump, which was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of the Sierra Club and Southern Border Communities Coalition. Though the Trump administration is certain to appeal the ruling, the ACLU said the court's decision was a clear vindication for the merits of the legal challenge brought.
"This ruling is a win for the rule of law, the environment, and border communities," Dror Ladin, staff attorney with the ACLU's National Security Project, said in a statement. "President Trump's xenophobic wall is already leveling protected lands, desecrating cultural sites, and destroying wildlife. There's no undoing the damage that's been done, but we will be back before the Supreme Court to finally put a stop to this destructive wall."
\u201cBIG WIN: 9th Circuit ruled against Trump's unconstitutional syphoning of military funds to build his vanity wall. This is a victory for border communities & for democracy. We & our partners @ACLU & @SierraClub are stopping Trump in his tracks. https://t.co/C3Vzylnon2\u201d— SBCC (@SBCC) 1593197508
Gloria Smith, managing attorney at the Sierra Club, applauded the ruling as "monumental for our border communities and desert wildlands" the stretch along the U.S.-Mexico border.
"We should be protecting communities, our democracy, and the environment, not tearing these things apart as Trump hoped to do," said Smith. "We rise with border communities to stop this administration from further inflicting its relentless agenda-- harming the people and places we know and love."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.