Immigrant rights activists demonstrate against U.S. President Donald Trump's policies on March 2, 2017 in downtown Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (Photo: Jessica Kourkounis/Getty Images)
Jun 06, 2018
A federal judge ruled on Wednesday that the Trump administration's policy of withholding law enforcement funding from Philadelphia over its status as a sanctuary city "violates statutory and constitutional law."
Contrasting with the Justice Department's policy, Philadelphia's refusal to cooperate fully with federal immigration authorities was based in "reasonable, rational," and "equitable" logic, ruled U.S. District Judge Michael Baylson.
\u201cTremendous defeat for Trump/Sessions attack on sanctuary cities\u2014fresh fed court ruling in Philadelphia v Sessions\u201d— Omar C. Jadwat (@Omar C. Jadwat) 1528306283
\u201cTrump threatened to punish Philadelphia for providing sanctuary to undocumented people-justice prevailed & today a Federal court ruled against him. Victory for human rights & a defeat for Trump's mean-spirited policies that terrorizes & tear families apart https://t.co/05Fkj68kHQ\u201d— Jim Kenney (@Jim Kenney) 1528314574
Baylson's decision came 10 months after Philadelphia sued the DOJ for attempting to withhold $1.5 million in law enforcement grant money from the city as punishment for not assisting in federal immigration arrests.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions threatened to keep the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant from the city if it refused to allow ICE agents into city prisons, notify the agency when undocumented immigrants leave prisons, and share information with the federal government about any individual's immigration status.
Philadelphia's police force is not an arm of federal immigration agencies, argued the city, and acting as such would damage community relations.
A similar ruling in favor of Philadelphia last November found that withholding the funds would significantly damage the city's ability to maintain its police force. The DOJ appealed that decision in January.
In addition to declaring that the city is "entitled to prompt payment" of the grant, Baylson refuted the Trump administration's repeated claims that American cities should participate in federal immigration enforcement because undocumented immigrants commit high rates of crime.
"The public statements of President Trump and Attorney General Sessions, asserting that immigrants commit more crimes than native-born citizens, are inaccurate as applied to Philadelphia, and do not justify the imposition of these three conditions," that the administration attempted to impose on the city in exchange for its law enforcement funding, Baylson wrote.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A federal judge ruled on Wednesday that the Trump administration's policy of withholding law enforcement funding from Philadelphia over its status as a sanctuary city "violates statutory and constitutional law."
Contrasting with the Justice Department's policy, Philadelphia's refusal to cooperate fully with federal immigration authorities was based in "reasonable, rational," and "equitable" logic, ruled U.S. District Judge Michael Baylson.
\u201cTremendous defeat for Trump/Sessions attack on sanctuary cities\u2014fresh fed court ruling in Philadelphia v Sessions\u201d— Omar C. Jadwat (@Omar C. Jadwat) 1528306283
\u201cTrump threatened to punish Philadelphia for providing sanctuary to undocumented people-justice prevailed & today a Federal court ruled against him. Victory for human rights & a defeat for Trump's mean-spirited policies that terrorizes & tear families apart https://t.co/05Fkj68kHQ\u201d— Jim Kenney (@Jim Kenney) 1528314574
Baylson's decision came 10 months after Philadelphia sued the DOJ for attempting to withhold $1.5 million in law enforcement grant money from the city as punishment for not assisting in federal immigration arrests.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions threatened to keep the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant from the city if it refused to allow ICE agents into city prisons, notify the agency when undocumented immigrants leave prisons, and share information with the federal government about any individual's immigration status.
Philadelphia's police force is not an arm of federal immigration agencies, argued the city, and acting as such would damage community relations.
A similar ruling in favor of Philadelphia last November found that withholding the funds would significantly damage the city's ability to maintain its police force. The DOJ appealed that decision in January.
In addition to declaring that the city is "entitled to prompt payment" of the grant, Baylson refuted the Trump administration's repeated claims that American cities should participate in federal immigration enforcement because undocumented immigrants commit high rates of crime.
"The public statements of President Trump and Attorney General Sessions, asserting that immigrants commit more crimes than native-born citizens, are inaccurate as applied to Philadelphia, and do not justify the imposition of these three conditions," that the administration attempted to impose on the city in exchange for its law enforcement funding, Baylson wrote.
A federal judge ruled on Wednesday that the Trump administration's policy of withholding law enforcement funding from Philadelphia over its status as a sanctuary city "violates statutory and constitutional law."
Contrasting with the Justice Department's policy, Philadelphia's refusal to cooperate fully with federal immigration authorities was based in "reasonable, rational," and "equitable" logic, ruled U.S. District Judge Michael Baylson.
\u201cTremendous defeat for Trump/Sessions attack on sanctuary cities\u2014fresh fed court ruling in Philadelphia v Sessions\u201d— Omar C. Jadwat (@Omar C. Jadwat) 1528306283
\u201cTrump threatened to punish Philadelphia for providing sanctuary to undocumented people-justice prevailed & today a Federal court ruled against him. Victory for human rights & a defeat for Trump's mean-spirited policies that terrorizes & tear families apart https://t.co/05Fkj68kHQ\u201d— Jim Kenney (@Jim Kenney) 1528314574
Baylson's decision came 10 months after Philadelphia sued the DOJ for attempting to withhold $1.5 million in law enforcement grant money from the city as punishment for not assisting in federal immigration arrests.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions threatened to keep the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant from the city if it refused to allow ICE agents into city prisons, notify the agency when undocumented immigrants leave prisons, and share information with the federal government about any individual's immigration status.
Philadelphia's police force is not an arm of federal immigration agencies, argued the city, and acting as such would damage community relations.
A similar ruling in favor of Philadelphia last November found that withholding the funds would significantly damage the city's ability to maintain its police force. The DOJ appealed that decision in January.
In addition to declaring that the city is "entitled to prompt payment" of the grant, Baylson refuted the Trump administration's repeated claims that American cities should participate in federal immigration enforcement because undocumented immigrants commit high rates of crime.
"The public statements of President Trump and Attorney General Sessions, asserting that immigrants commit more crimes than native-born citizens, are inaccurate as applied to Philadelphia, and do not justify the imposition of these three conditions," that the administration attempted to impose on the city in exchange for its law enforcement funding, Baylson wrote.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.