President Donald Trump has triggered a steady stream of criticism in response to his decision to block House Democrats' response to a controversial memo released last week. (Photo: Gage Skidmore/Flickr/cc)
Feb 10, 2018
President Donald Trump's decision late Friday to block a memo by House Democrats--which rebuts a "cherry-picked" document released last week that's been decried as "propaganda" meant to discredit the ongoing probe into allegations of collusion and obstruction of justice levied against the Trump campaign--was met with outrage by Democratic lawmakers, ethics experts, and other political observers.
\u201cTHIS IS OUTRAGEOUS. Both GOP & Dems voted to release Dem memo. I read it and am convinced @realDonaldTrump is now intentionally hiding relevant information from the American people in order to mislead the public. An innocent person would not block the memo.\n\n#ReleaseTheDemMemo https://t.co/f2bCtid8DQ\u201d— Ted Lieu (@Ted Lieu) 1518224923
In a letter to the House Intelligence Committee chairman, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.)--who served on Trump's transition team and is responsible for the creation of the "cherry-picked" memo--Trump's counsel wrote Friday that "although the president is inclined to declassify the [second] memorandum, because the memorandum contains numerous properly classified and especially sensitive passages, he is unable to do so at this time," and teased the possibility that Trump may approve the release of a redacted version.
Critics dismissed as disingenuous the president's claim that he had to block the second memo over national security concerns--pointing out that Trump ignored warnings from his own Justice Department about releasing the first memo, and even attacked top officials at the department and the FBI ahead of its release--and concluded that Trump simply wants to hide the takedown of the Nunes memo from the American public.
\u201cRefusal to release Democratic response to #NunesMemo - evidence of obstruction of justice by Donald Trump happening in real time.\u201d— Richard Blumenthal (@Richard Blumenthal) 1518225514
Rep. Adam Schiff (R-Calif.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee and the author of his party's response to the "deeply flawed and inaccurate" Nunes memo, said the document blocked by Trump "sets out material facts that were necessary for the public to see that the FBI acted properly in seeking a FISA warrant on Carter Page," a former Trump campaign staffer.
Schiff vowed Friday that Democrats on the Intelligence Committee will be promptly reviewing the redactions proposed by Trump's Department of Justice and the FBI, and "look forward to conferring with the agencies to determine how we can properly inform the American people about the misleading attack on law enforcement by the GOP and address any concerns over sources and methods."
If efforts to redact the Democrats' memo to meet the Trump administration's demands fail, the other option is for the House committee--which voted unanimously to release the second memo--to overrule the president by putting the decision to a full House vote.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
President Donald Trump's decision late Friday to block a memo by House Democrats--which rebuts a "cherry-picked" document released last week that's been decried as "propaganda" meant to discredit the ongoing probe into allegations of collusion and obstruction of justice levied against the Trump campaign--was met with outrage by Democratic lawmakers, ethics experts, and other political observers.
\u201cTHIS IS OUTRAGEOUS. Both GOP & Dems voted to release Dem memo. I read it and am convinced @realDonaldTrump is now intentionally hiding relevant information from the American people in order to mislead the public. An innocent person would not block the memo.\n\n#ReleaseTheDemMemo https://t.co/f2bCtid8DQ\u201d— Ted Lieu (@Ted Lieu) 1518224923
In a letter to the House Intelligence Committee chairman, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.)--who served on Trump's transition team and is responsible for the creation of the "cherry-picked" memo--Trump's counsel wrote Friday that "although the president is inclined to declassify the [second] memorandum, because the memorandum contains numerous properly classified and especially sensitive passages, he is unable to do so at this time," and teased the possibility that Trump may approve the release of a redacted version.
Critics dismissed as disingenuous the president's claim that he had to block the second memo over national security concerns--pointing out that Trump ignored warnings from his own Justice Department about releasing the first memo, and even attacked top officials at the department and the FBI ahead of its release--and concluded that Trump simply wants to hide the takedown of the Nunes memo from the American public.
\u201cRefusal to release Democratic response to #NunesMemo - evidence of obstruction of justice by Donald Trump happening in real time.\u201d— Richard Blumenthal (@Richard Blumenthal) 1518225514
Rep. Adam Schiff (R-Calif.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee and the author of his party's response to the "deeply flawed and inaccurate" Nunes memo, said the document blocked by Trump "sets out material facts that were necessary for the public to see that the FBI acted properly in seeking a FISA warrant on Carter Page," a former Trump campaign staffer.
Schiff vowed Friday that Democrats on the Intelligence Committee will be promptly reviewing the redactions proposed by Trump's Department of Justice and the FBI, and "look forward to conferring with the agencies to determine how we can properly inform the American people about the misleading attack on law enforcement by the GOP and address any concerns over sources and methods."
If efforts to redact the Democrats' memo to meet the Trump administration's demands fail, the other option is for the House committee--which voted unanimously to release the second memo--to overrule the president by putting the decision to a full House vote.
President Donald Trump's decision late Friday to block a memo by House Democrats--which rebuts a "cherry-picked" document released last week that's been decried as "propaganda" meant to discredit the ongoing probe into allegations of collusion and obstruction of justice levied against the Trump campaign--was met with outrage by Democratic lawmakers, ethics experts, and other political observers.
\u201cTHIS IS OUTRAGEOUS. Both GOP & Dems voted to release Dem memo. I read it and am convinced @realDonaldTrump is now intentionally hiding relevant information from the American people in order to mislead the public. An innocent person would not block the memo.\n\n#ReleaseTheDemMemo https://t.co/f2bCtid8DQ\u201d— Ted Lieu (@Ted Lieu) 1518224923
In a letter to the House Intelligence Committee chairman, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.)--who served on Trump's transition team and is responsible for the creation of the "cherry-picked" memo--Trump's counsel wrote Friday that "although the president is inclined to declassify the [second] memorandum, because the memorandum contains numerous properly classified and especially sensitive passages, he is unable to do so at this time," and teased the possibility that Trump may approve the release of a redacted version.
Critics dismissed as disingenuous the president's claim that he had to block the second memo over national security concerns--pointing out that Trump ignored warnings from his own Justice Department about releasing the first memo, and even attacked top officials at the department and the FBI ahead of its release--and concluded that Trump simply wants to hide the takedown of the Nunes memo from the American public.
\u201cRefusal to release Democratic response to #NunesMemo - evidence of obstruction of justice by Donald Trump happening in real time.\u201d— Richard Blumenthal (@Richard Blumenthal) 1518225514
Rep. Adam Schiff (R-Calif.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee and the author of his party's response to the "deeply flawed and inaccurate" Nunes memo, said the document blocked by Trump "sets out material facts that were necessary for the public to see that the FBI acted properly in seeking a FISA warrant on Carter Page," a former Trump campaign staffer.
Schiff vowed Friday that Democrats on the Intelligence Committee will be promptly reviewing the redactions proposed by Trump's Department of Justice and the FBI, and "look forward to conferring with the agencies to determine how we can properly inform the American people about the misleading attack on law enforcement by the GOP and address any concerns over sources and methods."
If efforts to redact the Democrats' memo to meet the Trump administration's demands fail, the other option is for the House committee--which voted unanimously to release the second memo--to overrule the president by putting the decision to a full House vote.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.