Button in French reads: GMO? I don't want any. (Photo: Daniel/cc/flickr)
Jun 12, 2014
In a decision denounced by green groups, European Union environment ministers on Thursday approved a proposal to give individual member states the authority to ban genetically modified crops that have received EU Commission approval.
But, as Bloombergnoted, "The draft law aims to accelerate endorsements at EU level of requests to plant gene-altered seeds made by companies such as Monsanto."
Friends of the Earth Europe criticized the vote as "a poisoned chalice which could open Europe's fields to more biotech crop."
"It is unacceptable that companies like Monsanto will be given the first say in any decision to ban their products," stated Mute Schimpf, food campaigner for the organization. "Governments must be able to ban unwanted and risky GM crops without needing the permission of the companies who profit from them."
Also criticizing the approval were the Greens in the European Parliament, who called the ruling a compromise that is "a Trojan horse."
Like Friends of the Earth's position, Green food safety spokesperson Bart Staes said the decision "risks finally opening the door to genetically-modified organisms across Europe, in spite of mass public opposition."
In addition to concerns over possible cross-contamination of crops, Staes added, "There are clear concerns that the opt-outs would not be legally sound and would be subject to legal challenges, leaving member states or regions isolated to defend their stance."
Both groups see the possibility of the new rule putting more power into the hands of corporations who make genetically modified seed.
Shimpf called it "unacceptable that companies like Monsanto will be given the first say in any decision to ban their products."
"Any new approval procedure should not be a tool for the Commission and biotech-corporations to bully EU member states into accepting authoriaations for GM crops for which legitimate concerns clearly exist," Staes stated. "The EU should instead respect the precautionary principle and take account of the consistent and legitimate opposition to this controversial technology."
"At a time when American consumers and farmers are waking up to the negative consequences of biotech firms like Monsanto, Europe should not abandon the more sensible approach it has championed for decades," Staes added.
The proposal now heads to the European Parliament.
____________________________
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In a decision denounced by green groups, European Union environment ministers on Thursday approved a proposal to give individual member states the authority to ban genetically modified crops that have received EU Commission approval.
But, as Bloombergnoted, "The draft law aims to accelerate endorsements at EU level of requests to plant gene-altered seeds made by companies such as Monsanto."
Friends of the Earth Europe criticized the vote as "a poisoned chalice which could open Europe's fields to more biotech crop."
"It is unacceptable that companies like Monsanto will be given the first say in any decision to ban their products," stated Mute Schimpf, food campaigner for the organization. "Governments must be able to ban unwanted and risky GM crops without needing the permission of the companies who profit from them."
Also criticizing the approval were the Greens in the European Parliament, who called the ruling a compromise that is "a Trojan horse."
Like Friends of the Earth's position, Green food safety spokesperson Bart Staes said the decision "risks finally opening the door to genetically-modified organisms across Europe, in spite of mass public opposition."
In addition to concerns over possible cross-contamination of crops, Staes added, "There are clear concerns that the opt-outs would not be legally sound and would be subject to legal challenges, leaving member states or regions isolated to defend their stance."
Both groups see the possibility of the new rule putting more power into the hands of corporations who make genetically modified seed.
Shimpf called it "unacceptable that companies like Monsanto will be given the first say in any decision to ban their products."
"Any new approval procedure should not be a tool for the Commission and biotech-corporations to bully EU member states into accepting authoriaations for GM crops for which legitimate concerns clearly exist," Staes stated. "The EU should instead respect the precautionary principle and take account of the consistent and legitimate opposition to this controversial technology."
"At a time when American consumers and farmers are waking up to the negative consequences of biotech firms like Monsanto, Europe should not abandon the more sensible approach it has championed for decades," Staes added.
The proposal now heads to the European Parliament.
____________________________
In a decision denounced by green groups, European Union environment ministers on Thursday approved a proposal to give individual member states the authority to ban genetically modified crops that have received EU Commission approval.
But, as Bloombergnoted, "The draft law aims to accelerate endorsements at EU level of requests to plant gene-altered seeds made by companies such as Monsanto."
Friends of the Earth Europe criticized the vote as "a poisoned chalice which could open Europe's fields to more biotech crop."
"It is unacceptable that companies like Monsanto will be given the first say in any decision to ban their products," stated Mute Schimpf, food campaigner for the organization. "Governments must be able to ban unwanted and risky GM crops without needing the permission of the companies who profit from them."
Also criticizing the approval were the Greens in the European Parliament, who called the ruling a compromise that is "a Trojan horse."
Like Friends of the Earth's position, Green food safety spokesperson Bart Staes said the decision "risks finally opening the door to genetically-modified organisms across Europe, in spite of mass public opposition."
In addition to concerns over possible cross-contamination of crops, Staes added, "There are clear concerns that the opt-outs would not be legally sound and would be subject to legal challenges, leaving member states or regions isolated to defend their stance."
Both groups see the possibility of the new rule putting more power into the hands of corporations who make genetically modified seed.
Shimpf called it "unacceptable that companies like Monsanto will be given the first say in any decision to ban their products."
"Any new approval procedure should not be a tool for the Commission and biotech-corporations to bully EU member states into accepting authoriaations for GM crops for which legitimate concerns clearly exist," Staes stated. "The EU should instead respect the precautionary principle and take account of the consistent and legitimate opposition to this controversial technology."
"At a time when American consumers and farmers are waking up to the negative consequences of biotech firms like Monsanto, Europe should not abandon the more sensible approach it has championed for decades," Staes added.
The proposal now heads to the European Parliament.
____________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.