Photo via Flickr / Toban B / Creative Commons License)
May 09, 2013
The same "Ag-Gag" laws that make it a crime to film or document egregious abuses on industrial farms may soon be used to criminalize anti-fracking activists who seek to expose environmental harms brought on by the gas drilling industry--if a bill recently proposed in Pennsylvannia passes.
House Bill 683, sponsored by Rep. Gary Haluska, D-Cambria, would make it a felony to take photos, video or audio on private land used for "agricultural purposes," downloading or distributing any such recordings; and entering agricultural property if one plans on recording.
However, as Pittsburg's TribLive reports, the bill would go even further, in that gas frackers now commonly drilling on land that would otherwise be used for "agricultural purposes" would also be protected--meaning anyone looking to document what goes on in the ordinary day of a gas fracker, could be slapped with felony charges.
According to TribLive, Ross Pifer, director of the Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center at Penn State University's Dickinson School of Law, said hydraulic fracturing operations could be protected under the new bill because gas companies often lease land from farmers.
"If you view it expansively, you'd have to view it as: Anything that takes place on that land (is protected)," Pifer said.
Melissa Troutman, outreach coordinator at Mountain Watershed Association, which investigates and records fracking activity, said the law would shield any illegal activities conducted by gas frackers from public view.
"If it passes, what's next?" said Troutman. "No documenting commercial or recreational activity? Right now it's legal to photograph industrial operations on public lands. Will that be illegal next?
Attempting to justify his sponsorship of the bill, Haluska claimed that activists only exaggerate criminal abuses inside of factory farms--meaning they should not be able to film what goes on inside. Haluska's words, however, did not serve his purpose: "They take video and say, 'Look, this guy's dragging a cow on a chain with a tractor.' Well, there aren't too many ways of moving a cow."
Matthew Dominguez, the Humane Society of the United States' public policy manager for farm animal protection, stated: "Animal welfare groups have exposed egregious animal cruelty through recordings and photos, and the industry's response hasn't been to clean up its act but to merely make it illegal to expose what's happening. They don't have the right to keep people in the dark. This bill would hinder our ability to expose abuses."
The same will now go for those in the gas fracking industry.
Ag-Gag bills have either been proposed or enacted in roughly a dozen states.
Versions have been passed in Iowa, Utah and Missouri, and are under consideration in Indiana, Nebraska, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Vermont.
_______________________
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Jacob Chamberlain
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.
The same "Ag-Gag" laws that make it a crime to film or document egregious abuses on industrial farms may soon be used to criminalize anti-fracking activists who seek to expose environmental harms brought on by the gas drilling industry--if a bill recently proposed in Pennsylvannia passes.
House Bill 683, sponsored by Rep. Gary Haluska, D-Cambria, would make it a felony to take photos, video or audio on private land used for "agricultural purposes," downloading or distributing any such recordings; and entering agricultural property if one plans on recording.
However, as Pittsburg's TribLive reports, the bill would go even further, in that gas frackers now commonly drilling on land that would otherwise be used for "agricultural purposes" would also be protected--meaning anyone looking to document what goes on in the ordinary day of a gas fracker, could be slapped with felony charges.
According to TribLive, Ross Pifer, director of the Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center at Penn State University's Dickinson School of Law, said hydraulic fracturing operations could be protected under the new bill because gas companies often lease land from farmers.
"If you view it expansively, you'd have to view it as: Anything that takes place on that land (is protected)," Pifer said.
Melissa Troutman, outreach coordinator at Mountain Watershed Association, which investigates and records fracking activity, said the law would shield any illegal activities conducted by gas frackers from public view.
"If it passes, what's next?" said Troutman. "No documenting commercial or recreational activity? Right now it's legal to photograph industrial operations on public lands. Will that be illegal next?
Attempting to justify his sponsorship of the bill, Haluska claimed that activists only exaggerate criminal abuses inside of factory farms--meaning they should not be able to film what goes on inside. Haluska's words, however, did not serve his purpose: "They take video and say, 'Look, this guy's dragging a cow on a chain with a tractor.' Well, there aren't too many ways of moving a cow."
Matthew Dominguez, the Humane Society of the United States' public policy manager for farm animal protection, stated: "Animal welfare groups have exposed egregious animal cruelty through recordings and photos, and the industry's response hasn't been to clean up its act but to merely make it illegal to expose what's happening. They don't have the right to keep people in the dark. This bill would hinder our ability to expose abuses."
The same will now go for those in the gas fracking industry.
Ag-Gag bills have either been proposed or enacted in roughly a dozen states.
Versions have been passed in Iowa, Utah and Missouri, and are under consideration in Indiana, Nebraska, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Vermont.
_______________________
Jacob Chamberlain
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.
The same "Ag-Gag" laws that make it a crime to film or document egregious abuses on industrial farms may soon be used to criminalize anti-fracking activists who seek to expose environmental harms brought on by the gas drilling industry--if a bill recently proposed in Pennsylvannia passes.
House Bill 683, sponsored by Rep. Gary Haluska, D-Cambria, would make it a felony to take photos, video or audio on private land used for "agricultural purposes," downloading or distributing any such recordings; and entering agricultural property if one plans on recording.
However, as Pittsburg's TribLive reports, the bill would go even further, in that gas frackers now commonly drilling on land that would otherwise be used for "agricultural purposes" would also be protected--meaning anyone looking to document what goes on in the ordinary day of a gas fracker, could be slapped with felony charges.
According to TribLive, Ross Pifer, director of the Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center at Penn State University's Dickinson School of Law, said hydraulic fracturing operations could be protected under the new bill because gas companies often lease land from farmers.
"If you view it expansively, you'd have to view it as: Anything that takes place on that land (is protected)," Pifer said.
Melissa Troutman, outreach coordinator at Mountain Watershed Association, which investigates and records fracking activity, said the law would shield any illegal activities conducted by gas frackers from public view.
"If it passes, what's next?" said Troutman. "No documenting commercial or recreational activity? Right now it's legal to photograph industrial operations on public lands. Will that be illegal next?
Attempting to justify his sponsorship of the bill, Haluska claimed that activists only exaggerate criminal abuses inside of factory farms--meaning they should not be able to film what goes on inside. Haluska's words, however, did not serve his purpose: "They take video and say, 'Look, this guy's dragging a cow on a chain with a tractor.' Well, there aren't too many ways of moving a cow."
Matthew Dominguez, the Humane Society of the United States' public policy manager for farm animal protection, stated: "Animal welfare groups have exposed egregious animal cruelty through recordings and photos, and the industry's response hasn't been to clean up its act but to merely make it illegal to expose what's happening. They don't have the right to keep people in the dark. This bill would hinder our ability to expose abuses."
The same will now go for those in the gas fracking industry.
Ag-Gag bills have either been proposed or enacted in roughly a dozen states.
Versions have been passed in Iowa, Utah and Missouri, and are under consideration in Indiana, Nebraska, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Vermont.
_______________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.