For Most Minorities, King's Dream of Economic Justice a 'Long Way from Home'

Published on
by
Common Dreams

For Most Minorities, King's Dream of Economic Justice a 'Long Way from Home'

MLK's fight for equality 'remains unfinished' says new report

by
Beth Brogan, staff writer

Fifty years after Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Have a Dream" speech, the hope for economic justice and equality is still a long way off for most minorities in the U.S., says a new report released Monday.

The average net worth of white families is more than six times higher than that of the average black family and 5.7 times greater than that of latino families, according to the tenth annual State of the Dream (pdf) report issued by the progressive economic group United For a Fair Economy

"Dr. King devoted the last years of his life to challenging economic injustice and the vast racial economic divide, but his work remains unfinished," the study's executive summary states. "Black and latino families continue to face significant economic disadvantages relative to white families."

Black and latino families faced a "shocking" loss of wealth between 2007 and 2010: the average net wealth of white families decreased by 6.7 percent, but black families lost 27.1 percent of their average net wealth, and latino families 41.3 percent. Black and latino families also carry substantially more debt than white families.

“We focus on wealth disparities because it is linked to a host of other socioeconomic inequities – health, education, income, opportunities and economic security among them. If we seriously reduce wealth inequity, it would go a long way toward resolving many of the other inequities,” says Brian Miller, Executive Director of UFE and co-author of the report.

The report describes how many aspects of financial inequality are largely due to the disparity in housing assets, where personal wealth is often held.

The report cites policies that encourage homeownership as a path toward building wealth as a primary cause of the inequality, because families with less wealth— disproportionately families of color—have benefited less from those policies.

"The vast, overwhelmingly white middle class that emerged in the post-WWII period did so in large part because of public policies including the GI Bill and FHA-guaranteed loans the benefits of which were largely denied to people of color," says the report.

Furthermore, while many homeowners borrowed against the value of their homes during the "housing bubble" of 2007-2010, when the bubble burst, "predatory lenders increasingly targeted borrowers of color with higher cost loans than were necessary ... [leaving] black and latino families in a worse financial position than their white counterparts."

“The hemorrhaging of wealth in communities of color stems largely from treating housing policy as an asset-building policy, rather than as two distinct strategies,” says co-author Tim Sullivan. “By trying to do housing and asset-building with the same policy, we’re actually doing neither of them well.”

The information contained in the report comes as no surprise. The 2012 "State of the Dream" reported that census figures predicted the although the US would be a majority minority nation by 2042, if the trends of the last 30 years continue, the economic racial divide would increase.

United for a Fair Economy advocates for, among other changes, wealth-building policies and tax breaks focused more on "those who need it most, regardless of whether or not they are homeowners."

More in: