Afghan Refugee Strategy A ‘Big Mistake’: UNHCR
KABUL -- The head of the UN refugee program in Afghanistan on Tuesday described its strategy in the war-wracked country since 2002 as the “biggest mistake UNHCR ever made”.
Almost a quarter of the population of Afghanistan is made up of refugees returning from Pakistan and Iran. Many find themselves homeless or living in slums under tarpaulin.
But Peter Nicolaus, UNHCR representative in Afghanistan, said the international community had failed to help returnees find a means of earning a living and therefore reintegrating into society.
“We made a big mistake, the biggest mistake UNHCR ever made,” he said of the strategy which was implemented in 2002.
“We thought if we gave humanitarian assistance then macro development would kick in.” Nicolaus said only now, 10 years after the US-led invasion and with 5.7 million refugees having returned to Afghanistan since 2002, was the UNHCR focusing more fully on the issue of sustainable reintegration.
An international conference involving Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan and the refugee agency is to be held in April to present the new long term strategy.
“It’s the income that counts, the livelihood. In very simple terms we need to find jobs for the people coming back,” Nicolaus said.
“You can build five roads to a village and the farmers will benefit because they can go to the next town to sell their vegetables.
“But the returnee doesn’t benefit at all. He has nothing to sell at the market.” Nicolaus was speaking at a distribution centre for vulnerable returnees, who were gathered on the outskirts of Kabul to receive a package of blankets, clothing, tarpaulins, wheat and coal.
The UNHCR is set to help 34,500 families, or 200,000 individuals, around the country as the freezing winter sets in.
But the difficulty of working in Afghanistan was underlined when the Afghan Minister of Refugees and Repatriation Jamaher Anwary stormed out of the center because there were UNHCR banners on display but no ministry logo.
Hundreds queued for assistance outside the walled compound, clutching the necessary papers that proved they were designated as being in need of help.
“My husband is old and I don’t have money to take him to the doctor,” said Parveen Shah, 56, from beneath a blue burqa, her hands stained with dirt.
“We live in a mud house and during the night it’s very cold. My son is working washing cars but we don’t have enough to eat.” Mohammad Tahar, 30, is one of the 3.7 million who have returned from Pakistan.
“I’m glad to be back in my own country but we are 20 in my family and we live in two rooms without electricity or drinking water,” the shopkeeper said.
“This assistance is nothing for us.” UNHCR provides cash grants for returnees of $150. The money covers transport home and is supposed to help them survive the first few months of their new lives.
Three million registered Afghan refugees still live in exile, but the lack of jobs, food and shelter and the volatile security situation in many parts of the country makes it difficult for those who want to return.
Although the rate has slowed considerably, another 66,500 people came back in 2011. But the UNHCR estimates that 40 per cent of all the returnees it has helped since 2002 are “not at all reintegrated”.
“In Afghanistan a quarter of the population are returnees,” said Nicolaus.
“This is what the donor community constantly forgets. This has been overlooked and it’s still overlooked. Nobody has taken this seriously. It’s a tragedy.
“We are now — for the first time — bringing this up in the spring conference.” As he spoke, dozens of boys lined up with their wheelbarrows. Armed guards were stationed at the gate and on the roof.
The boys hefted the coal into the barrows in a cloud of dust. They piled the package of blankets and supplies on top and wheeled their goods away.