Summers, Unapologetic To The Bitter End

Published on
by
Huffington Post

Summers, Unapologetic To The Bitter End

by
Dan Froomkin

Larry Summers, head of Obama's National Economic Council, has now stepped down from his post. Summers shrugged off efforts by two reporters to get him to express regrets about his two-year tenure, during which big banks thrived, but ordinary Americans suffered.(Credit: FENG LI/AFP/Getty Images)

In his final public remarks as head of President Obama's National
Economic Council on Monday morning, Larry Summers had nothing bad to
say about himself.

Summers shrugged off efforts by two reporters to get him to express regrets about his two-year tenure, during which big banks thrived, but ordinary Americans suffered.

"The president has said many, many times that none of us can rest or
be satisfied with anything like the current level of joblessness, with
anything like the income gap between what people could be earning and
what they are earning," Summers said at the liberal Economic Policy
Institute, a somewhat unusual setting for his swan song.

Despite the preponderance of progressives in the audience, the
passive conditional past subjunctive was about as close as Summers would
come to saying he was sorry. "That's where one would have liked to have
seen more rapid progress," he said.

But then came the "but": "One does need to recognize that relative to
what was really very widely feared, the outcome has been a good deal
better," he said.

Summers set a reasonable bar for himself in his prepared remarks,
stating, "It is by what happens to the middle class that our economic
policies must be judged."

By that measure, it's hard to see how those policies could be considered successful.

But perhaps the problem is that Summers' critics just aren't as smart as he was.

"Would I like the results to be even better than they have been on a
number of different dimensions? Of course," he said. "But I think the
president is right to take pride in what has been averted. And that is
not easy always for people to understand. But I think it is something
that is very important."

It's also too early for post-mortems, he said, opting to "leave that
to others" until he's had more time to mull things over. "I look forward
very much to being able to step back and think about some of the very
important questions that we talked about today," he said.

Despite Summers' public refusal to indulge in critical retrospection,
his host on Monday, Economic Policy Institute president Larry Mishel,
said that at a recent lunch, the ex-president of Harvard was somewhat
more forthcoming. "In private, Larry said he heavily pushed for more
demand-side action, including aid to the states, unemployment benefits
and more infrastructure," Mishel told HuffPost. "Though looking back, he
would have also liked to have pushed a large jobs tax credit."

In his speech, Summers said much more needs to be done. He argued
strongly in favor of increased government spending to create more
economic demand. "There cannot be any question that the constraint on
our economy now and for the next several years will be the lack of
demand," he said. "Without rapid recovery, all of our other goals will
be compromised."

Stimulus needs to be followed by a period of deficit reduction, he
said -- but he was vague as to when the nation should shift from one
phase to the other.

Summers continued to insist, as he did last week, that the approval of Obama's tax-cut deal is an economic necessity, though he said even more government action is needed. "The tax compromise will help, but not enough," he said.

The next step, he said, is investment in infrastructure. "A sustained
effort to rebuild America should be at the top of Washington's priority
list next year," he said.

If there was any humility on display Monday, it was when Summers made
reference to how he took his White House post after an extremely rocky
and unfortunate tenure at Harvard, where the faculty revolted against
his perceived arrogance and alleged misogyny, and where one of his
financial decisions cost the university's endowment $1 billion.

"I was one of the very few people," he said, "who came to Washington to get out of politics."

Share This Article

More in: