Bush Officials Celebrate Tax Cut ‘Trap’ They Laid Nine Years Ago

Published on
by
Think Progress

Bush Officials Celebrate Tax Cut ‘Trap’ They Laid Nine Years Ago

by
George Zornick

As debate rages
in Washington over the Bush tax cuts, set to expire at the end of this
year, the Bush administration officials who initiated the steep tax cuts
are celebrating what they see as an apparent victory, since signs point to a temporary extension of all the cuts. The Daily Beast’s Howard Kurtz interviewed
Dan Bartlett, Bush’s former communications director, and Andy Card,
Bush’s former chief of staff, among others, and they were pleased at how
the expiration debate has played out:

“We knew that, politically, once you get it into law, it becomes almost impossible to remove it,” says Dan Bartlett, Bush’s former communications director. “That’s not a bad legacy. The fact that we were able to lay the trap does feel pretty good, to tell you the truth.” [...]

[Democrats] are definitely on the defensive,” Card says. “The fact that the 10-year clock ran out now had a big impact on the election.”

As Media Matters notes,
former Bush senior adviser Karl Rove went on Fox News this week and
further laid the proverbial trap, saying “without a hint of
self-awareness” that “we’ve known this was going to be happening for a
decade,” while lamenting the Democrats’ inaction.

When the tax cuts were enacted, with an expiration date, Republicans
and Bush officials understood the political advantages of the “fiscal
time bomb” they were setting. As Kurtz puts
it: “At some point in the way distant future, Democrats could be
accused of raising taxes if they tried to undo the Bush breaks and
return to Clinton-era levels of taxation.” Democrats understood this,
too: Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND) told the Washington Post at the time that
“[Bush is] going to be out of office when the roof falls in.”

There was a more sinister motive for sunsetting the tax cuts beyond
politics, as well. It allowed the administration to pass the bill with a
lower vote count in the Senate than would otherwise be necessary. Card
freely admits
to Kurtz that the administration wanted “the law to be permanent but
couldn’t muster the votes to trump the Byrd Rule,” which would have required
a 60-vote margin for a measure that significantly increases the federal
deficit more than 10 years in the future. By setting the tax cuts to
expire just short of ten years, the measure passed with 58 votes.

The various sunsets also hid the true cost of the bill. As Paul Krugman wrote
at the time: “The administration, knowing that its tax cut wouldn’t fit
into any responsible budget, pushed through a bill that contains the
things it wanted most — big tax cuts for the very, very rich — and used
whatever accounting gimmicks it could find to make the overall budget
impact seem smaller than it is.”

Such deception and fiscal irresponsibility hardly seem cause for celebration. But because it appears that all of the tax cuts will once again be extended, resetting the fiscal time bomb in spite of public opposition, perhaps these Bush officials are justified in their mirth.

Share This Article

More in: