Anti-Spending Tea Party Caucus Members Took Over $1 Billion In Earmarks

Published on
by
Think Progress

Anti-Spending Tea Party Caucus Members Took Over $1 Billion In Earmarks

by
Alex Seitz-Wald

Congressional earmarks have been one of the primary targets
of the tea party, representing the nexus of the movement’s arch foes —
government spending and Washington influence peddling. If Republicans
“go back to their old earmarking ways it could be a VERY short majority,” the president of the hard-right Citizens Against Government Waste warned. Looking to capitalize on the tea party, Republican leaders endorsed
bans on earmarking as a way to show they were different from their
spendthrift predecessors in previous Congresses. And last month, House
Republicans unanimously extended an internal moratorium on earmarks.

But it appears that tea party’s self-proclaimed representatives in
Washington haven’t been putting their money where their mouths are.
Hotline On Call reports today that members of House Tea Party Caucus,
founded by Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) to “represent the views of our constituents,” requested over $1 billion in earmarks during the last fiscal year:

According to a Hotline review of records compiled by Citizens Against Government Waste, the 52
members of the caucus, which pledges to cut spending and reduce the
size of government, requested a total of 764 earmarks valued at
$1,049,783,150 during Fiscal Year 2010
, the last year for which records are available.

Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-Ala.), for one, attached his name to 69
earmarks in the last fiscal year, for a total of $78,263,000. The 41
earmarks Rep. Rodney Alexander (R-La.) requested were worth $65,395,000.
Rep. Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan.) wanted $63,400,000 for 39 special projects,
and Rep. Rob Bishop (R-Utah) wanted $93,980,000 set aside for 47
projects.

When asked to explain how they could join a caucus dedicated to
fighting government spending and yet request millions in pork projects,
tea party lawmakers told the Hotline that they stopped requesting new
earmarks after joining the group.

But this is hardly the first indication that Republicans may not be
as genuine in their commitment to fighting pork as they would like tea
party activists to believe. Last month, as the AP reported that “[o]nly three days
after GOP senators and senators-elect renounced earmarks, Arizona Sen.
Jon Kyl, the No. 2 Senate Republican, got himself a whopping $200
million to settle an Arizona Indian tribe’s water rights claim against
the government.” An earmark ban was also conspicuously absent from House Republicans’ Pledge to American governing agenda, causing uproar among activists.

Tea party favorite Sen.-elect Rand Paul (R-KY) highlights this
disparity between rhetoric and action well. In March, his website told
supporters that “a ban on wasteful earmark spending in Washington D.C.
[is] one of the key points of his campaign.” But after winning the election, Paul told the Wall Street Journal that he “will fight for Kentucky’s share of earmarks and federal pork,” suggesting it would be “crazy” not to.

Share This Article

More in: