Rightwing Activists Toe Corporate Line When It Comes to 'Net Neutrality'

Published on
by
TalkingPointsMemo

Rightwing Activists Toe Corporate Line When It Comes to 'Net Neutrality'

Tea Partiers Say Net Neutrality Hurts Freedom

by
Evan McMorris-Santoro

Members of the Tea Party movement protest on May 25, 2010 in San Francisco, California. (Getty Images)

The tea party, a movement whose success on the grassroots level is in
many ways attributable to the power of free and open Internet
communications, is joining the growing conservative crusade against the
FCC's plan to enforce net neutrality on internet service providers.
According to one tea partier involved in the effort, the movement is
opposing net neutrality because "it's an affront to free speech and free
markets."

The push toward an Internet regulated by corporations rather than
government seems to be a new part of the tea party agenda, with fears
mounting that the Obama administration's push for net neutrality is,
essentially, the next cap-and-trade, government health care takeover or
any of the myriad other socialist plots of the past year and a half.

As The Hill's Sara Jerome reports,
"35 Tea Party groups" across the country have joined a coalition of
conservative groups calling on the FCC "not to boost its authority over
broadband providers through a controversial process known as
reclassification." The coalition recently sent a letter to the FCC
calling on the government agency to keep its hand off the Internet.

One of the groups who signed the letter was the Fountain Hills Tea
Party in Arizona. Like many, many grassroots tea party groups across the
country, Fountain Hills has a Ning social networking site, as well as a more traditional homepage,
both key to communicating with members. Supporters of net neutrality
often suggest that it's smaller sites like these that would suffer the
most under the tiered Internet plan ISPs are expected to establish if no
government rules require them to treat all Internet traffic equally.

Much like the Netroots movement, the tea party's communication and
information dissemination is fueled by online tools. In addition to
Ning, tea partiers are avid tweeters, skypers, YouTubers and
Facebookers. Yet their seeming embrace of an Internet divvied up and
defined by corporate deals puts them at odds with their Internet-savvy colleagues on the left, who have clamored for net neutrality for years.

Peter Bordow, a leader of the Fountain Hills Tea Party, told me that
he's not completely ready to make a firm judgment on net neutrality yet,
but he leans toward opposing it. He has some experience with the issue,
having provided Internet services to customers in the past. (The letter
to the FCC is signed by Jeff Cohen, another leader of Fountain Hills.
But Bordow told me that his group "did not, as an organization, sign any
position or opinion letter of any kind regarding net neutrality.")

"To be completely honest, I have seen and heard fairly compelling
arguments on both sides of this issue," he said Friday. "As a former ISP
owner, and strong believer in the free market, I tend to oppose
legislation that gives appointed bureaucrats the power to tell (and
enforce) how companies design and deliver their services to their
customers."

In an email, Bordow broke down his concerns as a web-friendly tea partier when it comes to net neutrality:

It is possible (and may in fact even be predictable) that
this ability to selectively throttle traffic could be used to "unfairly"
limit certain traffic (Internet destinations) to users. I just don't
think it is the Government's responsibility (or within their enumerated
powers) to legislate powers to appointed bureaucrats to decide "what is
fair".

History shows us again and again that whenever the power to decide
"what is fair" is given to Government officials and/or appointed
bureaucrats, there is far more propensity and opportunity for abuse of
this power. It is only when free citizens and the free market are able
to flex their collective purchasing muscle that we can be sure that this
power is not abused.

So there you have it: on balance, tea partiers would rather leave
companies in charge of the Internet because, as Bordow says, that's
safer than another government bureaucracy. Indeed, Jamie Radtke, a
leader of the Virginia Tea Party Patriot Federation and another
signatory on the letter, told The Hill's Jerome that the Obama
administration push for net neutrality was the same kind of government
encroachment the tea party movement opposes on fronts like health care
and direct intervention in the economy. Radtke said to expect the tea
party to become a vocal part of the opposition to net neutrality rules
as the debate continues to heat up.

"I think the clearest thing is it's an affront to free speech and
free markets," Radtke told the paper. "There are so many assaults on
individual liberties -- the EPA, net neutrality, cap-and-trade,
card-check; the list goes on -- that sometimes the Tea Party doesn't
know where to start its battles."

Check out the letter sent to the FCC (as first published by The Hill) here:

081110lt_NetNeutrality_ThinkTankCoalition

More in: