Countries like Russia and Ukraine have accumulated millions of tonnes of emission credits because of the collapse of the Soviet economy in the late 1980s. Photograph: (Joe Klamar/AFP/Getty Images)
Jun 10, 2010
Developing countries were today shocked by new UN data showing that rich nations will be able to increase their carbon emissions by up to 8% if they take advantage of a series of major loopholes in their pledges.
Instead
of reducing emissions by a minimum of 30-40% by 2020 and holding
temperatures to a rise of 2C - as many campaigners hoped the Copenhagen
climate summit in December would achieve - many rich countries would
not need to make any domestic cuts to stay within the legal limits of a
new global climate deal being negotiated at resumed UN talks in Bonn
this week.
The figures, which are far higher than
expected, could be achieved by a series of carbon accountancy tricks
and devices including:
* Selling "hot air" or surplus carbon allowances that were created when Soviet economies collapsed in the late 1980s;
* Using carbon markets to "offset" as much as 30% of rich countries' emission cuts;
* Setting new rules to calculate emission gains and losses from logging and planting trees.
The
new analysis, prepared by Bolivia and released by the UN today,
converts developed countries' existing pledges into reduction targets
as used in the Kyoto protocol.
When combined with calculations of loopholes and carbon market
mechanisms, it shows a massive gap between the 30-40% cut that
scientists have said is needed to stem catastrophic climate change and the cuts which have been pledged by rich countries so far.
The
calculations show that if they do not use the loopholes, developed
countries would reduce emissions by 10-14% below 1990 levels by 2017.
But if the Bonn proposals are adopted, they could increase emissions by
between 4% and 8% above 1990 levels.
The wide gap between the pledges of rich countries and what is needed was recognised today by both the new UN climate chief, Christiana Figueres, and the outgoing executive secretary, Yvo de Boer, who will leave the UN next month.
"The
pledges that we have on the table are not sufficient to meet the 2C
pledge made in Copenhagen, and certainly not enough to guarantee the
survival of the most vulnerable and poorest. The pledges are
insufficient," said Figueres.
In his final speech, de Boer
said: "As things stand now we will not be able to halt the increase of
global greenhouse gas emissions in the next 10 years. The 2C world is
in danger."
Countries like Russia and Ukraine have
accumulated millions of tonnes of emission credits because of the
collapse of the Soviet economy in the late 1980s. They and other
eastern European countries want to be allowed to bank their credits to
sell on to other rich countries in the coming years.
Irina
Stavchuk, from the National Ecological Centre of Ukraine, said: "If
these credits are sold to developed countries, that will mean they will
not really cut emissions at all. The global levels of emissions will
not go down and it will be very hard to keep warming to safe levels".
"The
new data shows a frightening chasm between what the science says, what
the people have asked for and Earth needs, and what rich countries are
saying they are willing to do," said Bolivian ambassador, Pablo Solon.
"Rich
countries are undermining the entire climate regime, particularly the
binding targets of the Kyoto protocol. If this happens we'll have a
world without a legal system to make binding emission cuts, that's a
world of 4C temperature rise and climate catastrophe," said Lim Li Lin,
an analyst from the Malaysia-based Third World Network.
"The
proposals on the table are riddled with loopholes so its not surprising
that current targets will do nothing to protect the world from climate
disaster," said Asad Rehman, Friends of the Earth's international
climate change campaigner.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Developing countries were today shocked by new UN data showing that rich nations will be able to increase their carbon emissions by up to 8% if they take advantage of a series of major loopholes in their pledges.
Instead
of reducing emissions by a minimum of 30-40% by 2020 and holding
temperatures to a rise of 2C - as many campaigners hoped the Copenhagen
climate summit in December would achieve - many rich countries would
not need to make any domestic cuts to stay within the legal limits of a
new global climate deal being negotiated at resumed UN talks in Bonn
this week.
The figures, which are far higher than
expected, could be achieved by a series of carbon accountancy tricks
and devices including:
* Selling "hot air" or surplus carbon allowances that were created when Soviet economies collapsed in the late 1980s;
* Using carbon markets to "offset" as much as 30% of rich countries' emission cuts;
* Setting new rules to calculate emission gains and losses from logging and planting trees.
The
new analysis, prepared by Bolivia and released by the UN today,
converts developed countries' existing pledges into reduction targets
as used in the Kyoto protocol.
When combined with calculations of loopholes and carbon market
mechanisms, it shows a massive gap between the 30-40% cut that
scientists have said is needed to stem catastrophic climate change and the cuts which have been pledged by rich countries so far.
The
calculations show that if they do not use the loopholes, developed
countries would reduce emissions by 10-14% below 1990 levels by 2017.
But if the Bonn proposals are adopted, they could increase emissions by
between 4% and 8% above 1990 levels.
The wide gap between the pledges of rich countries and what is needed was recognised today by both the new UN climate chief, Christiana Figueres, and the outgoing executive secretary, Yvo de Boer, who will leave the UN next month.
"The
pledges that we have on the table are not sufficient to meet the 2C
pledge made in Copenhagen, and certainly not enough to guarantee the
survival of the most vulnerable and poorest. The pledges are
insufficient," said Figueres.
In his final speech, de Boer
said: "As things stand now we will not be able to halt the increase of
global greenhouse gas emissions in the next 10 years. The 2C world is
in danger."
Countries like Russia and Ukraine have
accumulated millions of tonnes of emission credits because of the
collapse of the Soviet economy in the late 1980s. They and other
eastern European countries want to be allowed to bank their credits to
sell on to other rich countries in the coming years.
Irina
Stavchuk, from the National Ecological Centre of Ukraine, said: "If
these credits are sold to developed countries, that will mean they will
not really cut emissions at all. The global levels of emissions will
not go down and it will be very hard to keep warming to safe levels".
"The
new data shows a frightening chasm between what the science says, what
the people have asked for and Earth needs, and what rich countries are
saying they are willing to do," said Bolivian ambassador, Pablo Solon.
"Rich
countries are undermining the entire climate regime, particularly the
binding targets of the Kyoto protocol. If this happens we'll have a
world without a legal system to make binding emission cuts, that's a
world of 4C temperature rise and climate catastrophe," said Lim Li Lin,
an analyst from the Malaysia-based Third World Network.
"The
proposals on the table are riddled with loopholes so its not surprising
that current targets will do nothing to protect the world from climate
disaster," said Asad Rehman, Friends of the Earth's international
climate change campaigner.
Developing countries were today shocked by new UN data showing that rich nations will be able to increase their carbon emissions by up to 8% if they take advantage of a series of major loopholes in their pledges.
Instead
of reducing emissions by a minimum of 30-40% by 2020 and holding
temperatures to a rise of 2C - as many campaigners hoped the Copenhagen
climate summit in December would achieve - many rich countries would
not need to make any domestic cuts to stay within the legal limits of a
new global climate deal being negotiated at resumed UN talks in Bonn
this week.
The figures, which are far higher than
expected, could be achieved by a series of carbon accountancy tricks
and devices including:
* Selling "hot air" or surplus carbon allowances that were created when Soviet economies collapsed in the late 1980s;
* Using carbon markets to "offset" as much as 30% of rich countries' emission cuts;
* Setting new rules to calculate emission gains and losses from logging and planting trees.
The
new analysis, prepared by Bolivia and released by the UN today,
converts developed countries' existing pledges into reduction targets
as used in the Kyoto protocol.
When combined with calculations of loopholes and carbon market
mechanisms, it shows a massive gap between the 30-40% cut that
scientists have said is needed to stem catastrophic climate change and the cuts which have been pledged by rich countries so far.
The
calculations show that if they do not use the loopholes, developed
countries would reduce emissions by 10-14% below 1990 levels by 2017.
But if the Bonn proposals are adopted, they could increase emissions by
between 4% and 8% above 1990 levels.
The wide gap between the pledges of rich countries and what is needed was recognised today by both the new UN climate chief, Christiana Figueres, and the outgoing executive secretary, Yvo de Boer, who will leave the UN next month.
"The
pledges that we have on the table are not sufficient to meet the 2C
pledge made in Copenhagen, and certainly not enough to guarantee the
survival of the most vulnerable and poorest. The pledges are
insufficient," said Figueres.
In his final speech, de Boer
said: "As things stand now we will not be able to halt the increase of
global greenhouse gas emissions in the next 10 years. The 2C world is
in danger."
Countries like Russia and Ukraine have
accumulated millions of tonnes of emission credits because of the
collapse of the Soviet economy in the late 1980s. They and other
eastern European countries want to be allowed to bank their credits to
sell on to other rich countries in the coming years.
Irina
Stavchuk, from the National Ecological Centre of Ukraine, said: "If
these credits are sold to developed countries, that will mean they will
not really cut emissions at all. The global levels of emissions will
not go down and it will be very hard to keep warming to safe levels".
"The
new data shows a frightening chasm between what the science says, what
the people have asked for and Earth needs, and what rich countries are
saying they are willing to do," said Bolivian ambassador, Pablo Solon.
"Rich
countries are undermining the entire climate regime, particularly the
binding targets of the Kyoto protocol. If this happens we'll have a
world without a legal system to make binding emission cuts, that's a
world of 4C temperature rise and climate catastrophe," said Lim Li Lin,
an analyst from the Malaysia-based Third World Network.
"The
proposals on the table are riddled with loopholes so its not surprising
that current targets will do nothing to protect the world from climate
disaster," said Asad Rehman, Friends of the Earth's international
climate change campaigner.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.