Organic, Small Farmers Fret over FDA Regulation

Published on
by
The San Francisco Chronicle

Organic, Small Farmers Fret over FDA Regulation

by
Carolyn Lochhead

Earthbound Farm, an organic grower in San Juan Bautista (San Benito County), packages and sells bags of lettuce. (Craig Lee / The Chronicle)

WASHINGTON -
Small farmers in California who have led a national movement away from
industrial agriculture face a looming crackdown on food safety that
they say is geared to big corporate farms and will make it harder for
them to survive.

The small growers, many of whom grow dozens of different kinds of
vegetables and fruits, say the inherent benefits of their size, and
their sensitivity to extra costs, are being ignored.

They are fighting to carve out a sanctuary in legislation that would
bring farmers under the strict purview of the Food and Drug
Administration, an agency more familiar with pharmaceuticals than food
and local farms.

A bill before the Senate is riding a bipartisan groundswell created
by recent outbreaks of E. coli, salmonella and other contamination in
everything from fresh spinach to cookie dough.

And the small farmers face opponents in consumer groups, victims of
food contamination, large growers and the Obama administration, who say
no farm and no food should get a pass on safety.

An even tougher version of the legislation passed the House last
summer. Now, a behind-the-scenes battle is raging in the Senate over
how to regulate small and organic growers without ruining them - and
still protect consumers.

If two versions of the overhaul pass, Congress would work to merge them.

The legislation would mandate a range of programs intended to
bolster food safety. The FDA would gain greater authority to regulate
how products are grown, stored, transported, inspected, traced from
farm to table and recalled when needed.

Pinpointing problems

But biologically diverse and organic growers argue that the problems that have plagued the food industry lie elsewhere.

They point to the sale of bagged vegetables, cut fruit and other
processed food in which vast quantities of produce from different farms
are mixed, sealed in containers and shipped long distances, creating a
host for harmful bacteria.

The legislation does not address what some experts suspect is the
source of E. coli contamination: the large, confined animal feeding
operations that are breeding grounds for E. coli and are regulated by
the U.S. Department of Agriculture, not the FDA.

"It does not take on the industrial animal industry and the abuses
going on," said Tom Willey of T&D Willey Farms in Madera, an
organic grower of Mediterranean vegetables. "The really dangerous
organisms we're dealing with out here, and trying to protect our
produce and other foodstuffs from, are coming out the rear end of
domestic animals."

No one in Congress or the administration has yielded in a
bureaucratic turf battle between the Department of Agriculture, which
regulates meat, poultry and eggs, and the FDA, which regulates all
other food.

The controversy began with the spinach E. coli outbreak near San
Juan Bautista in 2006 that left four people dead, 35 people with acute
kidney failure and 103 hospitalized. The bacteria, known as E. coli
O157:H7, first appeared in hamburger meat in the early 1980s and
migrated to produce, mainly lettuce and other leafy greens that are
cut, mixed and bagged for the convenience of shoppers.

Contamination

Since then, there have been dozens of contamination cases, leading
Congress to rewrite food safety laws by giving much more power to the
FDA. But small growers worry that they, and consumers, will suffer in
the sweep of reform.

"How do we trust that the FDA is going to know about things that the
San Francisco Bay Area has been very progressive on - the field to
fork, fresh, grow local, buy local - all of that?" said Rep. Sam Farr,
D-Carmel. "The organic people are feeling that the regulations the FDA
may promulgate will be so safety oriented, it'll put them out of
business."

Consumer groups say they care about small farmers but that safety comes first.

"Our principle is that food should be safe, whatever the source,"
said Sandra Eskin, director of the Pew Health Group's food safety
campaign, one of the Pew Charitable Trusts, which Monday sponsored a
public meeting on the issue with federal officials in Seaside (Monterey
County).

"People care profoundly about all these issues: feeding their
families, food safety, local agriculture," Eskin said. "It's a
passionate discussion and understandably so. Everybody eats."

Tom Nassif, head of Western Growers, which represents large produce growers, said small growers should not be exempt.

"If the small guy who sells to a farmers' market gets a family sick,
it's a blip on the radar screen," Nassif said. "There's not a big hue
and cry, because it didn't affect hundreds of people. What about those
people? Doesn't their food safety count?"

Protocols

The tension that has come with food safety reforms was on display
after the spinach outbreak rocked California. Large growers embraced
costly science-based safety protocols for all leafy greens - guidelines
that federal regulators are considering taking nationwide.

However, a UC Davis study last year by Shermain Hardesty and Yoko
Kusunose found that the rules have put smaller growers at a
disadvantage because their compliance costs are spread over fewer
acres. Hardesty said costs may be as high as $100 an acre.

Large produce buyers such as Wal-Mart and McDonald's have gone much
further than the industry standards. They have imposed rules of their
own that have forced many California farmers who supply them to fence
off waterways, poison wildlife to keep animals out of fields and
destroy crop hedgerows that support beneficial insects.

Deputy Agriculture Secretary Kathleen Merrigan said Monday the
administration is keeping a "close watch" on these so-called "super
metrics," acknowledging that they have harmed the environment but said,
"nobody gets a pass on food safety."

Increasing the danger

Willey, the Madera farmer, argued that many food safety rules tend
"to push us to embrace a paradigm of sterility," which, in the long
run, increases the danger.

"When you create microbial vacuums, they can be even more easily
taken over by pathogenic organisms," he said. "In organic agriculture,
we depend tremendously on a cooperative effort with beneficial
microorganisms. My whole soil fertility system is based on that.
Actually, soil fertility planetwide is based on that."

Efforts to modify proposed rules to make compliance easier for
biologically diversified farms have been more successful in the Senate
than in the House. New language that requires the FDA to consider farm
size, crop diversity, organic requirements and other issues has been
added.

"While none of these things in themselves solves the cause for
concern, they certainly point strongly in the direction of the FDA
needing to take into account these considerations," said Ferd Hoefner,
policy director for the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition.

Hoefner called the House bill a one-size-fits-all approach that would be a "complete disaster" for small farms.

Share This Article

More in: