Palestine Calls for Release of Intifada Leader in Prisoner Swap with Israel

Marwan Barghouti has helped to lead his people through two violent uprisings. But many believe he is the region's best chance for peace

From the tree-ringed campus of Birzeit University, a narrow road
leads deep inside the rocky valleys of the West Bank to the small,
unexceptional Palestinian village of Kobar. It is home to a few
thousand people, dotted with a handful of schools and mosques.

At
one whitewashed house, off the main road at the entrance to the
village, there is a carefully tended garden, with stone walls, a small
lawn, bougainvillea and citrus trees. Here Atif Barghouti sat in the
winter sunshine trying to make sense of the wash of rumours that
suggested his younger brother, Kobar's most famous son, might be on the
verge of release from jail, a release that might just revitalise the
fractured and demoralised Palestinian national movement.

For now
his brother, Marwan Barghouti, the Palestinians' most popular potential
leader, sits several miles to the west, a resident of cell number 28 in
Block Three of Israel's Haderim prison, where he is serving five life sentences for five counts of murder.

In
the past week there has been an apparent burst of progress in the
protracted negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist
movement, Hamas, over a vast prisoner swap. Under the developing deal,
mediated by German intelligence officers, Hamas would hand over Gilad
Shalit, an Israeli soldier captured near Gaza in June 2006, in return
for the release of perhaps 1,000 Palestinians from Israeli jails.
Several senior Palestinian officials say Barghouti's name is top of the
list of those to be released. If the deal goes ahead, it would be
Israel's biggest prisoner swap in more than 20 years. The freeing of
Barghouti could also be a watershed in the history of the Middle East conflict.

Atif
Barghouti, 60, said that there were "encouraging signs" and he was
"optimistic", but that he had heard such rumours many times before. The
village itself shows no sign yet of a welcome party, save the odd line
of graffiti sprayed on the walls referring to Barghouti by his
nickname: "We will never forget you, Abu Qassam."

Barghouti is
sometimes described by outsiders as a Nelson Mandela for the
Palestinians. He doesn't consider himself so. Once he said of himself:
"I am simply a regular guy from the Palestinian street advocating only
what every other oppressed person has advocated - the right to help
myself in the absence of help from anywhere else."

"Marwan
doesn't hold a magic wand in his hand," said his brother. "But he is
not a dirty person; his hands were not polluted by corruption or
politics. And he is on the Hamas list of prisoners not because of his
blue eyes, but because he is a national leader and has proved himself
beyond doubt."

One of seven brothers and sisters, he was born
into a poor family in a small, old house in the village centre. "Since
he was 16 or 17 he possessed a strong personality, a strong will," said
his brother. At 18 he was arrested by the Israeli military for the
first time. He was in his early 20s when construction began on Ateret,
a Jewish settlement built 10 miles inside the West Bank, overlooking
Kobar. The rows of heavily guarded, red-roofed, Swiss-chalet-style
homes, all illegal under international law, only underscore the reach
of Israel's occupation and its colonial settler project.

Prison delayed Barghouti's education by several years, but he attended Birzeit University, where he was deeply involved in the Fatah
student wing. He was then punished for his role in the first
Palestinian uprising, the intifada of 1987, with deportation to Jordan
for seven years. He welcomed the Oslo peace accords and met many times
with Israeli politicians and peace activists, always campaigning for a
two-state peace deal. But until his last arrest he also led the Tanzim,
Fatah's military wing, through the start of the much more deadly second
intifada.

Beyond his obvious popularity, Barghouti, 50, is
important on two counts. First, he is the one Palestinian figure who is
most likely to bridge the bitter divide between the rival factions of
Hamas and Fatah. In jail in mid-2006 he helped author the Prisoners' Document,
outlining a rapprochement between the two factions in which Hamas was
finally to adopt Fatah's long-held support for a two-state peace deal.

Second,
Barghouti advocates a parallel policy of negotiations with Israel
together with "resistance". Given that the Palestinians have been in
negotiations since 1991 and have so far failed to achieve the promise
of independence, his more assertive approach resonates deeply with his
people.

Ten days ago Barghouti wrote to a journalist from his
prison cell outlining his position: "Betting on negotiations alone was
never our choice. I have always called for a constructive mix of
negotiation, resistance, political, diplomatic and popular action." He
now seems to favour civil disobedience and non-violent protests,
similar to those held every week against the West Bank barrier, but he
also insists on the right to an armed struggle, within the occupied
territories and directed against Israeli soldiers and settlers.

Barghouti
was convicted in May 2004 for his role in three separate attacks that
left four Israelis and a Greek Orthodox monk dead. The judges said he
provided weapons and money for the attacks, but for the most part did
not have direct contact with those carrying out the killings.

He
was also given two consecutive terms of 20 years for a failed car
bombing at a shopping centre in Jerusalem and membership of a banned
"terror organisation", Fatah's al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, which was
responsible for many suicide bombings. His justification for attacks on
Israeli troops and settlers as "legitimate resistance" caused outrage
among the Israeli public.

In the first attack in June 2001, two
Palestinian gunmen ambushed a car in the West Bank, killing the driver,
a Greek Orthodox monk who may have been mistaken for a Jewish settler.
The second attack was another ambush in January 2002, in which an
Israeli driver who had stopped at a petrol station was shot dead near
Givat Ze'ev, a Jewish settlement in the West Bank. The third attack was
in March that year, when a Palestinian armed with grenades, knifes and
an assault rifle killed three Israelis eating at a popular Tel Aviv
seafood restaurant. Barghouti was acquitted of involvement in 21 other
murders.

Unlike many other Palestinians, Barghouti was tried,
convicted and sentenced in the Tel Aviv district court, not a military
court. The case was heavily publicised, with televised broadcasts, and
was regarded by Israelis as crucial in breaking the back of the
uprising and the wave of killings and bombings it brought with it. That
was only five years ago, for some too short a time to overturn his
sentence.

Arguably the current division between the Palestinian
factions works in Israel's interests and Barghouti's commitment to draw
Fatah and Hamas back together might represent a serious strategic
threat. Many in Israel's intelligence agencies apparently think so.

Last
week Silvan Shalom, a deputy prime minister, said categorically that
Barghouti would not be freed. In August, even Tzipi Livni, the former
foreign minister and now head of the centrist opposition Kadima party,
spoke out against his release, citing his conviction and sentence. That
came just days after Barghouti won, in his absence, election to Fatah's
top central committee. "The fact that the Palestinians elected him or
that someone here in Israel thinks that he can be a partner is not a
sufficient excuse for his release," she said.

Rami Igra, a former
senior officer in Mossad, said any prisoner swap would be "shameless
and bottomless surrender" to Hamas. "Imagine the day after: the Hamas
government will be crowned in victory and will link up with the
extremist leader Barghouti and adopt the idea of Israel's destruction,"
he wrote in the Israel Hayom newspaper last week. Such voices
often drown out those of other Israelis who have suggested his release
might, on the contrary, herald the long-imagined historic deal that
sets the Middle East at peace. The late respected Israeli defence
analyst Ze'ev Schiff once described Barghouti as a "charismatic,
popular and worthy Palestinian negotiating partner". Gush Shalom, the
Israeli peace movement, placed an advert in Friday's Ha'aretz that read simply: "Freeing Gilad Shalit is a moral act. Freeing Marwan Barghouti is a wise act."

It
was lunchtime on 15 April 2002, at the height of the second intifada,
when Israeli special forces tracked Barghouti to the house of a friend
in Ramallah. He was eventually arrested, walking out with his hands up,
along with his cousin and with the owner of the house, Ziad Abu Ain, a
senior Fatah figure and fellow former prisoner who was once deported
from the US.

Today Abu Ain is a deputy minister in the
Palestinian government in the West Bank. He believes the return of
Barghouti to active political life could revolutionise the Palestinian
struggle. "We will call for a civil intifada, to bring the Palestinians
onto the streets saying we will not accept the occupation... an intifada
with no weapons, no stones," he said. Abu Ain says he sees Barghouti
acting alongside Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas, also known as Abu
Mazen. "He is a good aide to Abu Mazen, not a replacement for him. Now
Palestinian society doesn't accept just Abu Mazen as a leader. Abu
Mazen needs a good tactician like Marwan behind him. Marwan will
support him as president, but he will not be a candidate against him."

However,
it is by no means certain that the rest of the Palestinian leadership
shares this appetite for renewed confrontation. Abbas himself has long
argued solely for the path of negotiations, rather than any armed
struggle or popular resistance. Many Palestinians now openly say how
much they regret the violence of the second intifada, which they
believe was mistaken and set their cause back. Even Abu Ain admits
mistakes were made. "We gave the OK to resistance by the gun against
Israeli troops and settlers. We were against operations inside Israel,
but it happened out of our control. We made a big mistake." Another
mistake came after the 11 September attacks when Abbas had counselled
the Fatah leadership to recognise the new diplomatic climate and
immediately halt violence, but he was ignored. "It was another
mistake," Abu Ain said. "People think in different ways."

It is
notable that Barghouti has not pitted himself directly against Abbas as
a candidate for future elections. He almost did in 2005, but backed
down. This time he and his advisers say that he will not challenge
Abbas and will only run if Abbas keeps to his promise to stand down at
the next election, whenever that is, although for now the Palestine
Liberation Organisation is likely to insist that Abbas stays in power.

However,
not everyone sees an Abbas-Barghouti partnership emerging as easily as
Abu Ain suggests. There are others in the party who might also vie for
power, among them Mohammad Dahlan, a former security chief with a
strong constituency in Washington, and Nasser al-Qudwa, a former
Palestinian representative at the UN. Barghouti himself represents a
younger force in the movement, which is eager to replace the ageing
leadership.

Abbas's credibility is already weak: after winning
the election five years ago on a promise of a negotiated peace deal he
has nothing to show for it except yet more Israeli settlement growth.
Some believe a major prisoner swap now would so benefit Hamas that it
would spell Abbas's quick political demise. "It will destroy him," said
Hani al-Masri, a respected Palestinian political analyst. "It will show
the only people who can release real prisoners are Hamas, while he
can't do anything. He will understand this is a sign by Israel to get
rid of him, especially if Marwan Barghouti is released. Imagine if he
nominates himself while Abu Mazen is still in power?"

One
Palestinian opinion poll in August said if Abbas stood as Fatah's
candidate for the Palestinian presidency against Ismail Haniyeh, a
Hamas leader and former prime minister, he would win 52% to 38%.
However, if it was Barghouti standing against Haniyeh he would win by a
far larger margin, 62% to 31%. Such findings are not new and are
glaringly obvious to the Palestinian leadership.

Barghouti writes
frequently from jail. He wrote to a conference on Palestinian prisoners
last week and called for a two-state solution, giving a taste of what
he might stand for if freed. He advocated a return to his 2006
Prisoners Document as a basis for uniting Hamas and Fatah, which he
sees as a priority. He also underlined the need for more "resistance".

"Anyone
who is betting that the suffering that the Palestinians have endured
will lead it to stop their struggle is wrong," he wrote. "That is
because the Palestinian people, who have led the longest revolution in
modern history and the two most significant uprisings any nation has
known, has an ever-replenished fountain of resistance. They will defend
and continue their legitimate struggle and resistance against the
occupation."

All now depends on the secret negotiations over the
Shalit prisoner swap, which restart tomorrow after a brief hiatus.
Reports suggest there is still disagreement over which prisoners Israel
is prepared to free, whether the list can include Barghouti, and what
will happen to them once released. Sa'd Nimr, a Fatah official and
close aide of Barghouti, insists he has been told by Hamas and by
Egypt, which also mediates in negotiations, that no deal will happen
without Barghouti's release. "The deal is going to happen because at
the end of the day the Israelis are bound to set their soldier free,"
he said. "The question is when, how and who will be freed?"

Join Us: News for people demanding a better world


Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place.

We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference.

Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today!

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.