Oct 20, 2009
Conservationist groups based in Alaska have accused the Obama administration of repeating the mistakes of George Bush after it gave the conditional go-ahead for Shell to begin drilling offshore for oil and natural gas in the environmentally sensitive Beaufort Sea.
The Minerals Management Service, part of the federal Interior Department, yesterday gave Shell the green light to begin exploratory wells off the north coast of Alaska in an Arctic
area that is home to large numbers of endangered bowhead whales and
polar bears, as well as walruses, ice seals and other species. The
permission would run from July to October next year, though Shell has
promised to suspend operations from its drill ship from late August
when local Inuit people embark on subsistence hunting.
Environmentalists
condemned the decision to allow drilling, saying it would generate
industrial levels of noise in the water and pollute both the air and
surrounding water. Rebecca Noblin, an Alaskan specialist with the
conservation group the Centre for Biological Diversity,
said: "We're disappointed to see the Obama administration taking
decisions that will threaten the Arctic. It might as well have been the
Bush administration."
Whit Sheard, the Alaskan expert with the environmental group Pacific Environment,
accused the US Interior Department of "again trying to implement an
overly aggressive Bush-era drilling plan in one of the riskiest areas
on the planet to drill".
The question of offshore oil drilling in
the Arctic was one of the controversial environmental issues that
confronted the Bush administration. Its permission for exploration in
the Beaufort Sea, widely condemned by environmentalists, was struck
down last year by a federal court on grounds that it had failed
sufficiently to consider the impacts on bowhead whales and the
subsistence activities of Inuit populations.
The ruling was later set aside and Shell withdrew its drilling plans.
According
to the National Marine Fisheries Service, there are between 30,000 and
50,0000 bowhead whales in the world, with up to 9,000 of them feeding
in the Beaufort Sea. The whales migrate twice a year through the area
and are crucial to the subsistence economy of the Inupiat people.
Whale
experts warn that the bowhead stocks are sensitive to noise and could
be driven further off shore by the disruption of drilling. That in turn
would have an impact on their chances of survival, which have already
been harmed by early side-effects of global warming.
There are also fears that any drilling could lead to oil spills which would be impossible to clean up amid the Arctic's broken sea ice.
Shell
must now satisfy the authorities that it has met air and water quality
standards and safeguards for whale protection before it can begin
drilling. The oil company's head in Alaska, Pete Slaiby, said
objections had been taken into account.
"We sincerely believe
this exploration plan addresses concerns we have heard in the North
Slope communities which have resulted in the programmes being adjusted
accordingly," he said.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Conservationist groups based in Alaska have accused the Obama administration of repeating the mistakes of George Bush after it gave the conditional go-ahead for Shell to begin drilling offshore for oil and natural gas in the environmentally sensitive Beaufort Sea.
The Minerals Management Service, part of the federal Interior Department, yesterday gave Shell the green light to begin exploratory wells off the north coast of Alaska in an Arctic
area that is home to large numbers of endangered bowhead whales and
polar bears, as well as walruses, ice seals and other species. The
permission would run from July to October next year, though Shell has
promised to suspend operations from its drill ship from late August
when local Inuit people embark on subsistence hunting.
Environmentalists
condemned the decision to allow drilling, saying it would generate
industrial levels of noise in the water and pollute both the air and
surrounding water. Rebecca Noblin, an Alaskan specialist with the
conservation group the Centre for Biological Diversity,
said: "We're disappointed to see the Obama administration taking
decisions that will threaten the Arctic. It might as well have been the
Bush administration."
Whit Sheard, the Alaskan expert with the environmental group Pacific Environment,
accused the US Interior Department of "again trying to implement an
overly aggressive Bush-era drilling plan in one of the riskiest areas
on the planet to drill".
The question of offshore oil drilling in
the Arctic was one of the controversial environmental issues that
confronted the Bush administration. Its permission for exploration in
the Beaufort Sea, widely condemned by environmentalists, was struck
down last year by a federal court on grounds that it had failed
sufficiently to consider the impacts on bowhead whales and the
subsistence activities of Inuit populations.
The ruling was later set aside and Shell withdrew its drilling plans.
According
to the National Marine Fisheries Service, there are between 30,000 and
50,0000 bowhead whales in the world, with up to 9,000 of them feeding
in the Beaufort Sea. The whales migrate twice a year through the area
and are crucial to the subsistence economy of the Inupiat people.
Whale
experts warn that the bowhead stocks are sensitive to noise and could
be driven further off shore by the disruption of drilling. That in turn
would have an impact on their chances of survival, which have already
been harmed by early side-effects of global warming.
There are also fears that any drilling could lead to oil spills which would be impossible to clean up amid the Arctic's broken sea ice.
Shell
must now satisfy the authorities that it has met air and water quality
standards and safeguards for whale protection before it can begin
drilling. The oil company's head in Alaska, Pete Slaiby, said
objections had been taken into account.
"We sincerely believe
this exploration plan addresses concerns we have heard in the North
Slope communities which have resulted in the programmes being adjusted
accordingly," he said.
Conservationist groups based in Alaska have accused the Obama administration of repeating the mistakes of George Bush after it gave the conditional go-ahead for Shell to begin drilling offshore for oil and natural gas in the environmentally sensitive Beaufort Sea.
The Minerals Management Service, part of the federal Interior Department, yesterday gave Shell the green light to begin exploratory wells off the north coast of Alaska in an Arctic
area that is home to large numbers of endangered bowhead whales and
polar bears, as well as walruses, ice seals and other species. The
permission would run from July to October next year, though Shell has
promised to suspend operations from its drill ship from late August
when local Inuit people embark on subsistence hunting.
Environmentalists
condemned the decision to allow drilling, saying it would generate
industrial levels of noise in the water and pollute both the air and
surrounding water. Rebecca Noblin, an Alaskan specialist with the
conservation group the Centre for Biological Diversity,
said: "We're disappointed to see the Obama administration taking
decisions that will threaten the Arctic. It might as well have been the
Bush administration."
Whit Sheard, the Alaskan expert with the environmental group Pacific Environment,
accused the US Interior Department of "again trying to implement an
overly aggressive Bush-era drilling plan in one of the riskiest areas
on the planet to drill".
The question of offshore oil drilling in
the Arctic was one of the controversial environmental issues that
confronted the Bush administration. Its permission for exploration in
the Beaufort Sea, widely condemned by environmentalists, was struck
down last year by a federal court on grounds that it had failed
sufficiently to consider the impacts on bowhead whales and the
subsistence activities of Inuit populations.
The ruling was later set aside and Shell withdrew its drilling plans.
According
to the National Marine Fisheries Service, there are between 30,000 and
50,0000 bowhead whales in the world, with up to 9,000 of them feeding
in the Beaufort Sea. The whales migrate twice a year through the area
and are crucial to the subsistence economy of the Inupiat people.
Whale
experts warn that the bowhead stocks are sensitive to noise and could
be driven further off shore by the disruption of drilling. That in turn
would have an impact on their chances of survival, which have already
been harmed by early side-effects of global warming.
There are also fears that any drilling could lead to oil spills which would be impossible to clean up amid the Arctic's broken sea ice.
Shell
must now satisfy the authorities that it has met air and water quality
standards and safeguards for whale protection before it can begin
drilling. The oil company's head in Alaska, Pete Slaiby, said
objections had been taken into account.
"We sincerely believe
this exploration plan addresses concerns we have heard in the North
Slope communities which have resulted in the programmes being adjusted
accordingly," he said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.