The People vs Wall Street

Published on
by
The Independent/UK

The People vs Wall Street

Bear Stearns bankers on trial in first criminal case of the credit crunch

by
Stephen Foley

Former Bear Stearns hedge fund manager Ralph Cioffi arrives at court in New York yesterday. (AP photo)

Amidst the economic wreckage, after 7 million job losses and approaching 2
million home foreclosures in the US alone, with businesses and consumers
around the world still struggling to get finance after the long credit
crunch, Wall Street is finally on trial. A little piece of Wall Street, at
least.

In the first major case against bankers at the heart of the financial
meltdown, a jury of 12 mainly working-class New Yorkers will decide the fate
of the two Bear Stearns managers whose hedge funds imploded in 2007,
signalling the start of the crisis. Ralph Cioffi, 53, and Matt Tannin, 48,
pocketed millions of dollars in pay during the boom years, but the events of
2007 left their investors nursing losses of $1.6bn (£1bn) and ruined forever
the reputation of Bear Stearns, one of the oldest investment banks on Wall
Street.

Dressed as if for a funeral, the pair sat impassively in the brightly lit
courtroom in downtown Brooklyn yesterday as assistant US attorney Patrick
Sinclair recounted what he said was a litany of lies that they told to
investors. The two men were desperate to stop investors deserting their
funds when the sub-prime mortgage market began to plunge, Mr Sinclair said.
Mr Cioffi alone was paid $32m in the two years before the funds collapsed.

They "violated a special relationship of trust" between fund
managers and investors, he added. "They lied to investors to save their
multimillion dollar bonuses. In the US, that is a crime, a serious crime.
It's called securities fraud." The prosecution plans to lean heavily on
private emails written by the men which suggest they knew much earlier that
the sub-prime market was – in a word used by Mr Tannin – "toast".
Yet the men glossed over the situation and deceived investors in two ways,
it is alleged.

First, Mr Tannin said he was putting more of his own money into the funds,
when in fact he did not invest a single cent of the $1m that was available
in his bank account. Mr Cioffi, meanwhile, secretly withdrew $2m of his
money. Second, Mr Cioffi denied any major investor was planning to pull out,
when he had already received a major redemption request. More than a dozen
friends and family crammed in to the few public benches, and more spilled
into an overflow room as the trial got under way. While the prosecution
aimed to distil the case for jurors into a handful of straightforward lies,
it was clear yesterday that the defence will portray the events of 2007 as
much more nuanced – and highly complicated. In an idiosyncratic opening
statement, Mr Cioffi's lawyer, Dane Butswinkas, launched into an educational
session on high finance. At one point, he used waste-paper baskets in an
attempt to explain how hedge funds worked.

The prosecution is unfairly "cherry-picking from thousands and thousands
of emails", Mr Butswinkas complained. "It is easier to call the
right play on Monday morning after the game on Sunday, and it is always
easier to pick the right investment strategy after the fact. Hindsight is
20-20."

Mr Cioffi was described by Mr Butswinkas as a man who reached a high level on
Wall Street through talent and hard work. He came to New York in the late
Seventies "with $200 in a slightly worn-out pouch" and "with
hopes of being a banker". Mr Tannin's defence team will give their
opening arguments this morning.

The trial promises to be a bitter fight between prosecutors, who accuse the
pair of lying and manipulating evidence, and defence lawyers, who say the
men are being made scapegoats for a financial crisis that was not of their
making. The outcome could also be a harbinger of things to come, as the US
Justice Department considers bringing cases against even bigger fish on Wall
Street.

"This is not a revenge opportunity," the 75-year-old judge, Frederic
Block, had told prospective jurors. Neither Mr Cioffi nor Mr Tannin is
charged with "causing" the credit crisis. They are charged with
behaving dishonestly when the crisis began to break. The pair were traders
in mortgage securities, curators of two hedge funds that invested in debt
which is now known to have been toxic but which had seemed to promise great
riches. They worked at the long end of the chain that stretched from
overheated housing markets in the south and west of the US, where millions
of buyers were tempted into taking on mortgages they could not afford. Those
mortgages were sliced and diced by Wall Street and turned into securities
which could be bought and sold as if they were shares. Credit rating
agencies had certified the Bear Stearns funds' mortgage derivative portfolio
as super-safe; the defendants' superiors at Bear Stearns and the funds'
outside investors believed they were taking little risk. The question is
when the two managers realised this was far from true.

Messrs Cioffi and Tannin face 20 years in jail if they are found guilty of the
securities fraud. Mr Cioffi is additionally charged with insider dealing.

Share This Article

More in: