Oklahoma Sued Over New Abortion Ultrasound Law

Published on
by
the San Francisco Chronicle

Oklahoma Sued Over New Abortion Ultrasound Law

by
Ron Jenkins

An advocacy group is suing over an Oklahoma
law that prohibits a woman from getting an abortion unless she first
has an ultrasound and the doctor describes to her what the fetus looks
like.

In the lawsuit filed Thursday in Oklahoma County District Court,
the Center for Reproductive Rights says that the requirement intrudes
on privacy, endangers health and assaults dignity.

The law, set to go into effect Nov. 1, would make Oklahoma the
fourth state in the nation to require that an ultrasound be performed
before a woman can have an abortion and that the ultrasound be made
available to the patient for viewing, according to the Guttmacher
Institute, a health research organization in Washington, D.C. The other
states are Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi.

Backers of the lawsuit say Oklahoma is the only state to require
that the ultrasound screen be turned toward the woman during the
procedure and that the doctor describe what is on the screen, including
various dimensions of the fetus.

Lawmakers overrode Gov. Brad Henry's veto to pass the anti-abortion
legislation in April. Henry, a Democrat, said he vetoed the bill
because it didn't exempt victims of rape or incest from the ultrasound
requirement.

Republican state Sen. Todd Lamb said supporters of the law hope that it will curtail abortions in the state.

"I introduced the bill because I wanted to encourage life in society. In Oklahoma, society is on the side of life," Lamb said.

Lamb said he believes the lawsuit will stand a constitutional test.
He disagreed with arguments that it forces a woman to view the
ultrasound. The law says women may avert their eyes during the
ultrasound.

"This bill provides more information to a mother," he said.

The lawsuit against the state was filed on behalf of Nova Health Systems doing business as Reproductive Services in Tulsa.

One provision of the law prohibits women from collecting damages
based on claims that a baby born with defects would have been better
off aborted. Abortion rights activists have said they fear the
provision could allow doctors to withhold information about
abnormalities in the fetus that could lead to complications after birth.

"Anti-choice activists will stop at nothing to prevent a woman from
getting an abortion, but trying to manipulate a woman's decisions about
her own life and health goes beyond the pale," said Stephanie Toti,
staff attorney in the U.S. Legal Program of the Center for Reproductive
Rights and lead attorney on the case. "Governments should stop playing
doctor and leave medical determinations to physicians and health
decisions to individuals."

 

Share This Article

More in: