For McCain and Team, a Host of Ties to Gambling
Senator John McCain was on a roll. In a room reserved for high-stakes gamblers at the Foxwoods Resort Casino
in Connecticut, he tossed $100 chips around a hot craps table. When the
marathon session ended around 2:30 a.m., the Arizona senator and his
entourage emerged with thousands of dollars in winnings.
A lifelong gambler, Mr. McCain takes risks, both on and off the
craps table. He was throwing dice that night not long after his failed
2000 presidential bid, in which he was skewered by the Republican Party's
evangelical base, opponents of gambling. Mr. McCain was betting at a
casino he oversaw as a member of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee,
and he was doing so with the lobbyist who represents that casino,
according to three associates of Mr. McCain.
The visit had been arranged by the lobbyist, Scott Reed, who works
for the Mashantucket Pequot, a tribe that has contributed heavily to
Mr. McCain's campaigns and built Foxwoods into the world's
second-largest casino. Joining them was Rick Davis,
Mr. McCain's current campaign manager. Their night of good fortune
epitomized not just Mr. McCain's affection for gambling, but also the
close relationship he has built with the gambling industry and its
lobbyists during his 25-year career in Congress.
As a two-time chairman of the Indian Affairs Committee, Mr. McCain
has done more than any other member of Congress to shape the laws
governing America's casinos, helping to transform the once-sleepy
Indian gambling business into a $26-billion-a-year behemoth with 423
casinos across the country. He has won praise as a champion of economic
development and self-governance on reservations.
"One of the founding fathers of Indian gaming" is what Steven Light,
a University of North Dakota professor and a leading Indian gambling
expert, called Mr. McCain.
As factions of the ferociously competitive gambling industry have
vied for an edge, they have found it advantageous to cultivate a
relationship with Mr. McCain or hire someone who has one, according to
an examination based on more than 70 interviews and thousands of pages
Mr. McCain portrays himself as a Washington maverick unswayed by
special interests, referring recently to lobbyists as "birds of prey."
Yet in his current campaign, more than 40 fund-raisers and top advisers
have lobbied or worked for an array of gambling interests - including
tribal and Las Vegas casinos, lottery companies and online poker
When rules being considered by Congress threatened a California
tribe's planned casino in 2005, Mr. McCain helped spare the tribe. Its
lobbyist, who had no prior experience in the gambling industry, had a
nearly 20-year friendship with Mr. McCain.
In Connecticut that year, when a tribe was looking to open the
state's third casino, staff members on the Indian Affairs Committee
provided guidance to lobbyists representing those fighting the casino,
e-mail messages and interviews show. The proposed casino, which would
have cut into the Pequots' market share, was opposed by Mr. McCain's
colleagues in Connecticut.
Mr. McCain declined to be interviewed. In written answers to
questions, his campaign staff said he was "justifiably proud" of his
record on regulating Indian gambling. "Senator McCain has taken
positions on policy issues because he believed they are in the public
interest," the campaign said.
Mr. McCain's spokesman, Tucker Bounds, would not discuss the
senator's night of gambling at Foxwoods, saying: "Your paper has
repeatedly attempted to insinuate impropriety on the part of Senator
McCain where none exists - and it reveals that your publication is
desperately willing to gamble away what little credibility it still
Over his career, Mr. McCain has taken on special interests, like big
tobacco, and angered the capital's powerbrokers by promoting campaign
finance reform and pushing to limit gifts that lobbyists can shower on
lawmakers. On occasion, he has crossed the gambling industry on issues
like regulating slot machines.
Perhaps no episode burnished Mr. McCain's image as a reformer more
than his stewardship three years ago of the Congressional investigation
into Jack Abramoff,
the disgraced Republican Indian gambling lobbyist who became a national
symbol of the pay-to-play culture in Washington. The senator's
leadership during the scandal set the stage for the most sweeping
overhaul of lobbying laws since Watergate.
"I've fought lobbyists who stole from Indian tribes," the senator
said in his speech accepting the Republican presidential nomination
But interviews and records show that lobbyists and political
operatives in Mr. McCain's inner circle played a behind-the-scenes role
in bringing Mr. Abramoff's misdeeds to Mr. McCain's attention - and
then cashed in on the resulting investigation. The senator's longtime
chief political strategist, for example, was paid $100,000 over four
months as a consultant to one tribe caught up in the inquiry, records
Mr. McCain's campaign said the senator acted solely to protect
American Indians, even though the inquiry posed "grave risk to his
As public opposition to tribal casinos has grown in recent years,
Mr. McCain has distanced himself from Indian gambling, Congressional
and American Indian officials said.
But he has rarely wavered in his loyalty to Las Vegas, where he
counts casino executives among his close friends and most prolific
fund-raisers. "Beyond just his support for gaming, Nevada supports John
McCain because he's one of us, a Westerner at heart," said Sig Rogich,
a Nevada Republican kingmaker who raised nearly $2 million for Mr.
McCain at an event at his home in June.
Only six members of Congress have received more money from the
gambling industry than Mr. McCain, and five hail from the casino hubs
of Nevada and New Jersey, according to data from the Center for
Responsive Politics dating back to 1989. In the presidential race,
Senator Barack Obama has also received money from the industry; Mr. McCain has raised almost twice as much.
In May 2007, as Mr. McCain's presidential bid was floundering, he
spent a weekend at the MGM Grand on the Las Vegas strip. A fund-raiser
hosted by J. Terrence Lanni, the casino's top executive and a longtime
friend of the senator, raised $400,000 for his campaign. Afterward, Mr.
McCain attended a boxing match and hit the craps tables.
For much of his adult life, Mr. McCain has gambled as often as once
a month, friends and associates said, traveling to Las Vegas for
weekend betting marathons. Former senior campaign officials said they
worried about Mr. McCain's patronage of casinos, given the power he
wields over the industry. The officials, like others interviewed for
this article, spoke on condition of anonymity.
"We were always concerned about appearances," one former official
said. "If you go around saying that appearances matter, then they
The former official said he would tell Mr. McCain: "Do we really
have to go to a casino? I don't think it's a good idea. The base
doesn't like it. It doesn't look good. And good things don't happen in
casinos at midnight."
"You worry too much," Mr. McCain would respond, the official said.
A Record of Support
In one of their last conversations, Representative Morris K. Udall,
Arizona's powerful Democrat, whose devotion to American Indian causes
was legendary, implored his friend Mr. McCain to carry on his legacy.
"Don't forget the Indians," Mr. Udall, who died in 1998, told Mr.
McCain in a directive that the senator has recounted to others.
More than a decade earlier, Mr. Udall had persuaded Mr. McCain to
join the Senate Indian Affairs Committee. Mr. McCain, whose home state
has the third-highest Indian population, eloquently decried the
"grinding poverty" that gripped many reservations.
The two men helped write the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 after the Supreme Court
found that states had virtually no right to control wagering on
reservations. The legislation provided a framework for the oversight
and growth of Indian casinos: In 1988, Indian gambling represented less
than 1 percent of the nation's gambling revenues; today it captures
more than one third.
On the Senate floor after the bill's passage, Mr. McCain said he
personally opposed Indian gambling, but when impoverished communities
"are faced with only one option for economic development, and that is
to set up gambling on their reservations, then I cannot disapprove."
In 1994, Mr. McCain pushed an amendment that enabled dozens of
additional tribes to win federal recognition and open casinos. And in
1998, Mr. McCain fought a Senate effort to rein in the boom.
He also voted twice in the last decade to give casinos tax breaks
estimated to cost the government more than $326 million over a dozen
The first tax break benefited the industry in Las Vegas, one of a
number of ways Mr. McCain has helped nontribal casinos. Mr. Lanni, the
MGM Mirage chief executive, said that an unsuccessful bid by the
senator to ban wagering on college sports in Nevada was the only time
he could recall Mr. McCain opposing Las Vegas. "I can't think of any
other issue," Mr. Lanni said.
The second tax break helped tribal casinos like Foxwoods and was pushed by Scott Reed, the Pequots' lobbyist.
Mr. McCain had gotten to know Mr. Reed during Senator Bob Dole's
1996 presidential campaign, which Mr. Reed managed. Four years later,
when Mr. McCain ran for president, Mr. Reed recommended he hire his
close friend and protégé, Rick Davis, to manage that campaign.
During his 2000 primary race against George W. Bush,
Mr. McCain promoted his record of helping Indian Country, telling
reporters on a campaign swing that he had provided critical support to
"the Pequot, now the proud owners of the largest casino in the world."
But Mr. McCain's record on Indian gambling was fast becoming a
difficult issue for him in the primary. Bush supporters like Gov. John Engler of Michigan lambasted Mr. McCain for his "close ties to Indian gambling."
A decade after Mr. McCain co-authored the Indian gambling act, the
political tides had turned. Tribal casinos, which were growing at a
blazing pace, had become increasingly unpopular around the country for
reasons as varied as morality and traffic.
Then came the biggest lobbying scandal to shake Washington.
Behind an Inquiry
At a September 2004 hearing of the Indian Affairs Committee, Mr.
McCain described Jack Abramoff as one of the most brazen in a long line
of crooks to cheat American Indians. "It began with the sale of
Manhattan, and has continued ever since," he said. "What sets this tale
apart, what makes it truly extraordinary, is the extent and degree of
the apparent exploitation and deceit."
Over the next two years, Mr. McCain helped uncover a breathtaking
lobbying scandal - Mr. Abramoff and a partner bilked six tribes of $66
million - that showcased the senator's willingness to risk the wrath of
his own party to expose wrongdoing. But interviews and documents show
that Mr. McCain and a circle of allies - lobbyists, lawyers and senior
strategists - also seized on the case for its opportunities.
For McCain-connected lobbyists who were rivals of Mr. Abramoff, the
scandal presented a chance to crush a competitor. For senior McCain
advisers, the inquiry allowed them to collect fees from the very
Indians that Mr. Abramoff had ripped off. And the investigation enabled
Mr. McCain to confront political enemies who helped defeat him in his
2000 presidential run while polishing his maverick image.
The Abramoff saga started in early 2003 when members of two tribes
began questioning Mr. Abramoff's astronomical fees. Over the next year,
they leaked information to local newspapers, but it took the hiring of
lobbyists who were competitors of Mr. Abramoff to get the attention of
Mr. McCain's committee.
Bernie Sprague, who led the effort by one of the tribes, the Saginaw
Chippewas in Michigan, hired a Democratic lobbyist who recommended that
the tribe retain Scott Reed, the Republican lobbyist, to push for an
Mr. Reed had boasted to other lobbyists of his access to Mr. McCain,
three close associates said. Mr. Reed "pretty much had open access to
John from 2000 to at least the end of 2006," one aide said.
Lobbyist disclosure forms show that Mr. Reed went to work for the
Saginaw Chippewa on Feb. 15, 2004, charging the tribe $56,000 over a
year. Mr. Abramoff had tried to steal the Pequots and another tribal
client from Mr. Reed, and taking down Mr. Abramoff would eliminate a
Mr. Reed became the chief conduit to Mr. McCain's committee for
billing documents and other information Mr. Sprague was digging up on
Mr. Abramoff, Mr. Sprague said, who said Mr. Reed "did a great to
service to me."
"He had contacts I did not," Mr. Sprague said. "Initially, I think
that the senator's office was doing Reed a favor by listening to me."
A few weeks after hiring Mr. Reed, Mr. Sprague received a letter from the senator. "We have met with Scott Reed, who was very helpful on the issue," Mr. McCain wrote.
Information about Mr. Abramoff was also flowing to Mr. McCain's
committee from another tribe, the Coushatta of Louisiana. The source
was a consultant named Roy Fletcher, who had been Mr. McCain's deputy
campaign manager in 2000, running his war room in South Carolina.
It was in that primary race that two of Mr. Abramoff's closest associates, Grover Norquist, who runs the nonprofit Americans for Tax Reform, and Ralph Reed, the former director of the Christian Coalition,
ran a blistering campaign questioning Mr. McCain's conservative
credentials. The senator and his advisers blamed that attack for Mr.
McCain's loss to Mr. Bush in South Carolina, creating tensions that
would resurface in the Abramoff matter.
"I was interested in busting" Mr. Abramoff, said Mr. Fletcher, who
was eventually hired to represent the tribe. "That was my job. But I
was also filled with righteous indignation, I got to tell you."
Mr. Fletcher said he began passing information to John Weaver, Mr.
McCain's chief political strategist, and other staff members in late
2003 or January 2004. Mr. Weaver confirmed the timing.
Mr. McCain announced his investigation on Feb. 26, 2004, citing an
article on Mr. Abramoff in The Washington Post. He did not mention the
action by lobbyists and tribes in the preceding weeks. His campaign
said no one in his "innermost circle" brought information to Mr. McCain
that prompted the investigation.
The senator declared he would not investigate members of Congress,
whom Mr. Abramoff had lavished with tribal donations and golf outings
to Scotland. But in the course of the investigation, the committee
exposed Mr. Abramoff's dealings with the two men who had helped defeat
Mr. McCain in the 2000 primary.
The investigation showed that Mr. Norquist's foundation was used by
Mr. Abramoff to launder lobbying fees from tribes. Ralph Reed was found
to have accepted $4 million to run bogus antigambling campaigns. And
the investigation also highlighted Mr. Abramoff's efforts to curry
favor with the House majority leader at the time, Tom DeLay, Republican of Texas, a longtime political foe who had opposed many of Mr. McCain's legislative priorities.
Mr. McCain's campaign said the senator did not "single out" Ralph
Reed or Mr. Norquist, neither of whom were ever charged, and that both
men fell within the "scope of the investigation." The inquiry, which
led to guilty pleas by over a dozen individuals, was motivated by a
desire to help aggrieved tribes, the campaign said.
Inside the investigation, the sense of schadenfreude was palpable,
according to several people close to the senator. "It was like hitting
pay dirt," said one associate of Mr. McCain's who had consulted with
the senator's office on the investigation. "And face it - McCain and
Weaver were maniacal about Ralph Reed and Norquist. They were sticking
little pins in dolls because those guys had cost him South Carolina."
Down on the Coushattas reservation, bills related to the
investigation kept coming. After firing Mr. Abramoff, the tribe hired
Kent Hance, a lawyer and former Texas congressman who said he had been
friends with Mr. McCain since the 1980s.
David Sickey, the tribe's vice chairman, said he was "dumbfounded"
over the bills submitted by Mr. Hance's firm, Hance Scarborough, which
had been hired by Mr. Sickey's predecessors.
"The very thing we were fighting seemed to be happening all over
again - these absurd amounts of money being paid," Mr. Sickey said.
Mr. Hance's firm billed the tribe nearly $1.3 million over 11 months
in legal and political consulting fees, records show. But Mr. Sickey
said that the billing statements offered only vague explanations for
services and that he could not point to any tangible results. Two
consultants, for instance, were paid to fight the expansion of gambling
in Texas - even though it was unlikely given that the governor there
opposed any such prospect, Mr. Sickey said.
Mr. Hance and Jay B. Stewart, the firm's managing partner, defended
their team's work, saying they successfully steered the tribe through a
difficult period. "We did an outstanding job for them," Mr. Hance said.
"When we told them our bill was going to be $100,000 a month, they
thought we were cheap. Mr. Abramoff had charged them $1 million a
The firm's fees covered the services of Mr. Fletcher, who served as
the tribe's spokesman. Records also show that Mr. Hance had Mr. Weaver
- who was serving as Mr. McCain's chief strategist - put on the tribe's
payroll from February to May 2005.
It is not precisely clear what role Mr. Weaver played for his $100,000 fee.
Mr. Stewart said Mr. Weaver was hired because "he had a lot of
experience with the Senate, especially the new chairman, John McCain."
The Hance firm told the tribe in a letter that Mr. Weaver was hired to
provide "representation for the tribe before the U.S. Senate."
But Mr. Weaver never registered to lobby on the issue, and he has another explanation for his work.
"The Hance law firm retained me to assist them and their client in
developing an aggressive crisis management and communications
strategy," Mr. Weaver said. "At no point was I asked by Kent Hance or
anyone associated with him to set up meetings with anyone in or outside
of government to discuss this, and if asked I would have summarily
declined to do so."
In June 2005, the tribe informed Mr. Hance that his services were no longer needed.
Change in Tone
After the Abramoff scandal, Mr. McCain stopped taking campaign
donations from tribes. Some American Indians were offended, especially
since Mr. McCain continued to accept money from the tribes' lobbyists.
Resentment in Indian Country mounted as Mr. McCain, who was
preparing for another White House run, singled out the growth in tribal
gambling as one of three national issues that were "out of control."
(The others were federal spending and illegal immigration.)
Franklin Ducheneaux, an aide to Morris Udall who helped draft the
1988 Indian gambling law, said that position ran contrary to Mr.
McCain's record. "What did he think? That Congress intended for the
tribes to be only somewhat successful?" Mr. Ducheneaux said.
Mr. McCain began taking a broad look at whether the laws were
sufficient to oversee the growing industry. His campaign said that the
growth had put "considerable stress" on regulators and Mr. McCain held
hearings on whether the federal government needed more oversight power.
An opportunity to restrain the industry came in the spring of 2005,
when a small tribe in Connecticut set off a political battle. The
group, the Schaghticoke Tribal Nation, had won federal recognition in
2004 after producing voluminous documentation tracing its roots.
The tribe wanted to build Connecticut's third casino, which would
compete with Foxwoods and another, the Mohegan Sun. Facing public
opposition on the proposed casino, members of the Connecticut political
establishment - many of whom had received large Pequot and Mohegan
campaign donations - swung into action.
Connecticut officials claimed that a genealogical review by the Bureau of Indian Affairs was flawed, and that the Schaghticoke was not a tribe.
The tribe's opponents, led by the Washington lobbying firm Barbour
Griffith & Rogers, turned to Mr. McCain's committee. It was a
full-circle moment for the senator, who had helped the Pequots gain
tribal recognition in the 1980s despite concerns about their
Now, Mr. McCain was doing a favor for allies in the Connecticut delegation, including Senator Joseph I. Lieberman,
a close friend, according to two former Congressional aides. "It was
one of those collegial deals," said one of the aides, who worked for
Barbour Griffith & Rogers wanted Mr. McCain to hold a hearing
that would show that the Bureau of Indian Affairs was "broken," said
Bradley A. Blakeman, who was a lobbyist for the firm at the time.
"It was our hope that the hearing would shed light on the fact that
the bureau had not followed their rules and had improperly granted
recognition to the Schaghticoke," Mr. Blakeman said. "And that the
bureau would revisit the issue and follow their rules."
Mr. McCain's staff helped that effort by offering strategic advice.
His staff told a lobbyist for the firm that the Indian Affairs
Committee "would love to receive a letter" from the Connecticut
governor requesting a hearing, according to an e-mail exchange, and
offered "guidance on what the most effective tone and approach" would be in the letter.
On May 11, 2005, Mr. McCain held a hearing billed as a general
"oversight hearing on federal recognition of Indian tribes." But nearly
all the witnesses were Schaghticoke opponents who portrayed the tribe
Mr. McCain set the tone: "The role that gaming and its nontribal
backers have played in the recognition process has increased
perceptions that it is unfair, if not corrupt."
Chief Richard F. Velky of the Schaghticokes found himself facing off
against the governor and most of the state's congressional delegation.
"The deck was stacked against us," Mr. Velky said. "They were given
lots of time. I was given five minutes."
He had always believed Mr. McCain "to be an honest and fair man," Mr. Velky said, "but this didn't make me feel that good."
Mr. Velky said he felt worse when the e-mail messages
between the tribe's opponents and Mr. McCain's staff surfaced in a
federal lawsuit. "Is there a letter telling me how to address the
senator to give me the best shot?" Mr. Velky asked. "No, there is not."
After the hearing, Pablo E. Carrillo, who was Mr. McCain's chief
Abramoff investigator at the time, wrote to a Barbour Griffith &
Rogers lobbyist, Brant Imperatore. "Your client's side definitely got a
good hearing record," Mr. Carillo wrote, adding "you probably have a good sense" on where Mr. McCain "is headed on this."
"Well done!" he added.
Cynthia Shaw, a Republican counsel to the committee from 2005 to
2007, said Mr. McCain made decisions based on merit, not special
interests. "Everybody got a meeting who asked for one," Ms. Shaw said,
"whether you were represented by counsel or by a lobbyist - or
regardless of which lobbyist."
Mr. McCain's campaign defended the senator's handling of the
Schaghticoke case, saying no staff member acted improperly. The
campaign said the session was part of normal committee business and the
notion that Mr. McCain was intending to help Congressional colleagues
defeat the tribe was "absolutely false."
It added that the senator's commitment to Indian sovereignty "remains as strong as ever."
Within months of the May 2005 hearing, the Bureau of Indian Affairs
took the rare step of rescinding the Schaghticokes' recognition. A
federal court recently rejected the tribe's claim that the reversal was
Making an Exception
That spring of 2005, as the Schaghticokes went down to defeat in the
East, another tribe in the West squared off against Mr. McCain with its
bid to construct a gambling emporium in California. The stakes were
similar, but the outcome would be far different.
The tribe's plan to build a casino on a former Navy
base just outside San Francisco represented a trend rippling across the
country: American Indians seeking to build casinos near population
centers, far from their reservations.
The practice, known as "off-reservation shopping," stemmed from the
1988 Indian gambling law, which included exceptions allowing some
casinos to be built outside tribal lands. When Mr. McCain began his
second stint as chairman of the Indian Affairs Committee three years
ago, Las Vegas pressed him to revisit the exceptions he had helped
create, according to Sig Rogich, the Republican fund-raiser from Nevada.
"We told him this off-reservation shopping had to stop," Mr. Rogich
said. "It was no secret that the gaming industry, as well as many
potentially affected communities in other states, voiced opposition to
In the spring of 2005, Mr. McCain announced he was planning a
sweeping overhaul of Indian gambling laws, including limiting
off-reservation casinos. His campaign said Las Vegas had nothing to do
with it. In a 2005 interview with The Oregonian, Mr. McCain said that
if Congress did not act, "soon every Indian tribe is going to have a
casino in downtown, metropolitan areas."
Prospects for the proposed California project did not look
promising. Then the tribe, the Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians, hired a
lobbyist based in Phoenix named Wes Gullett.
Mr. Gullett, who had never represented tribes before Congress, had
known Mr. McCain since the early 1980s. Mr. Gullett met his wife while
they were working in Mr. McCain's Washington office. He subsequently
managed Mr. McCain's 1992 Senate campaign and served as a top aide to
his 2000 presidential campaign. Their friendship went beyond politics.
When Mr. McCain's wife, Cindy, brought two infants in need of medical
treatment back to Arizona from Bangladesh, the Gulletts adopted one
baby and the McCains the other. The two men also liked to take weekend
trips to Las Vegas.
Another of Mr. McCain's close friends, former Defense Secretary William S. Cohen,
was a major investor in the Guidivilles' proposed casino. Mr. Cohen,
who did not return calls, was best man at Mr. McCain's 1980 wedding.
Scott Crowell, lawyer for the Guidivilles, said Mr. Gullett was
hired to ensure that Mr. McCain's overhaul of the Indian gambling laws
did not harm the tribe.
Mr. Gullett said he never talked to Mr. McCain about the
legislation. "If you are hired directly to lobby John McCain, you are
not going to be effective," he said. Mr. Gullett said he only helped
prepare the testimony of the tribe's administrator, Walter Gray, who
was invited to plead his case before Mr. McCain's committee in July
2005. Mr. Gullett said he advised Mr. Gray in a series of conference
On disclosure forms filed with the Senate, however, Mr. Gullett
stated that he was not hired until November, long after Mr. Gray's
testimony. Mr. Gullett said the late filing might have been "a mistake,
but it was inadvertent." Steve Hart, a former lawyer for the
Guidivilles, backed up Mr. Gullett's contention that he had guided Mr.
Gray on his July testimony.
When asked whether Mr. Gullett had helped him, Mr. Gray responded,
"I've never met the man and couldn't tell you anything about him."
On Nov. 18, 2005, when Mr. McCain introduced his promised
legislation overhauling the Indian gambling law, he left largely intact
a provision that the Guidivilles needed for their casino. Mr. McCain's
campaign declined to answer whether the senator spoke with Mr. Gullett
or Mr. Cohen about the project. In the end, Mr. McCain's bill died,
largely because Indian gambling interests fought back. But the
Department of Interior picked up where Mr. McCain left off, effectively
doing through regulations what he had hoped to accomplish
legislatively. Carl Artman, who served as the Interior Department's
assistant secretary of Indian Affairs until May, said Mr. McCain pushed
him to rewrite the off-reservation rules. "It became one of my top
priorities because Senator McCain made it clear it was one of his top
priorities," he said.
The new guidelines were issued on Jan. 4. As a result, the casino
applications of 11 tribes were rejected. The Guidivilles were not among
Kitty Bennett and Griff Palmer contributed to reporting.
Kitty Bennett and Griff Palmer contributed to reporting.