Addington Clashes With Democrats As Torture Hearing Starts

Published on
by
Politico.com

Addington Clashes With Democrats As Torture Hearing Starts

by
John Bresnahan

David Addington, Vice President Cheney's chief of staff, has started a testy duel with Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee.

Watch the hearings.

Addington, appearing cocky and not in the least intimidated by the congressional inquisitors, denied that he played a key role in drafting an Aug. 2002 memo on interrogation techniques that could be used on detainees, including suspected al Qaeda terrorists.

Addington said he was present at a meeting when John Yoo, a controversial former Justice Dept. official, told him and then-White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales that Yoo would be conducting a broad review of the president's authority to allow use of such severe techniques.

Addington refused to answer when asked by Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) about whether a president could authorize torture.

"I'm not rendering legal advice to the committee," Addington said. "You have lawyers who can render you legal advice."

Addington said, however, that as a "general proposition," no president could authorize any actions expressly violating federal law.

Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.) was clearly irritated with Addington and Yoo's refusal to answer direct questions.

"What is the answer?" Conyers yelled at Yoo when Yoo refused to answer a direct question. Conyers and Addington then got into a spat over whether Addington supports the "unitary executive" theory. They bickered over who meant what by saying "unitary."

Addington then denied taking part in a high-level meeting of Bush administration officials in 2002 to review interrogation techniques.

© 2008 Politico

Share This Article

More in: