Dec 10, 2007
The UN climate talks seeking a new pact on global warming hit a potential problem today when the US said it was unwilling to approve a draft agreement setting firm targets for cuts to carbon pollution.The US said a proposal for developed nations to reduce emissions by 25-40% by 2020, which is backed by Britain and the EU, was "totally unrealistic" and "unhelpful". Other nations, including Japan, are believed to be against the idea.
The US said it was in Bali to be "constructive" and wanted the meeting to agree a roadmap to a new agreement, which would be concluded by 2009. But it said it would not agree a firm target, presented either as an emissions reduction or as a maximum temperature rise.
European negotiators argue such a target is needed to reflect the urgency of the problem and to encourage industry to invest in green technology.
In an unusual step, the UN published the text of the four-page draft agreement, based on the first week of informal discussions, on its website over the weekend. It will now be argued over by the 190 countries present.
Observers said the draft would be repeatedly modified and updated through the week. A final version must be agreed by Friday.
The initial draft calls on countries to respond to the "unequivocal scientific evidence that preventing the worst effects of climate change will require [developed nations] to reduce emissions in a range of 25-40% below 1990 levels by 2020 and that global emissions of greenhouse gases need to peak in the next 10 to 15 years".
Harlan Watson, the senior climate negotiator for the US, said: "We have problems with defining the numbers up front. In our view that pre-judges the outcome of the negotiations over the next two years."
He said the US supported the concept of a "shared global goal" to address climate change but did not want the Bali meeting to discuss exact numbers.
The 25-40% figure is based on the work of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, due to be formally awarded the Nobel peace prize jointly with Al Gore today. Watson said the IPCC calculation was based on "many uncertainties".
Yvo de Boer, the head of the UN climate secretariat, said the 25-40% figure would be a "critical issue" at the talks. He said it was an important signpost to show where the world was heading in dealing with global warming.
(c) 2007 The Guardian
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The UN climate talks seeking a new pact on global warming hit a potential problem today when the US said it was unwilling to approve a draft agreement setting firm targets for cuts to carbon pollution.The US said a proposal for developed nations to reduce emissions by 25-40% by 2020, which is backed by Britain and the EU, was "totally unrealistic" and "unhelpful". Other nations, including Japan, are believed to be against the idea.
The US said it was in Bali to be "constructive" and wanted the meeting to agree a roadmap to a new agreement, which would be concluded by 2009. But it said it would not agree a firm target, presented either as an emissions reduction or as a maximum temperature rise.
European negotiators argue such a target is needed to reflect the urgency of the problem and to encourage industry to invest in green technology.
In an unusual step, the UN published the text of the four-page draft agreement, based on the first week of informal discussions, on its website over the weekend. It will now be argued over by the 190 countries present.
Observers said the draft would be repeatedly modified and updated through the week. A final version must be agreed by Friday.
The initial draft calls on countries to respond to the "unequivocal scientific evidence that preventing the worst effects of climate change will require [developed nations] to reduce emissions in a range of 25-40% below 1990 levels by 2020 and that global emissions of greenhouse gases need to peak in the next 10 to 15 years".
Harlan Watson, the senior climate negotiator for the US, said: "We have problems with defining the numbers up front. In our view that pre-judges the outcome of the negotiations over the next two years."
He said the US supported the concept of a "shared global goal" to address climate change but did not want the Bali meeting to discuss exact numbers.
The 25-40% figure is based on the work of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, due to be formally awarded the Nobel peace prize jointly with Al Gore today. Watson said the IPCC calculation was based on "many uncertainties".
Yvo de Boer, the head of the UN climate secretariat, said the 25-40% figure would be a "critical issue" at the talks. He said it was an important signpost to show where the world was heading in dealing with global warming.
(c) 2007 The Guardian
The UN climate talks seeking a new pact on global warming hit a potential problem today when the US said it was unwilling to approve a draft agreement setting firm targets for cuts to carbon pollution.The US said a proposal for developed nations to reduce emissions by 25-40% by 2020, which is backed by Britain and the EU, was "totally unrealistic" and "unhelpful". Other nations, including Japan, are believed to be against the idea.
The US said it was in Bali to be "constructive" and wanted the meeting to agree a roadmap to a new agreement, which would be concluded by 2009. But it said it would not agree a firm target, presented either as an emissions reduction or as a maximum temperature rise.
European negotiators argue such a target is needed to reflect the urgency of the problem and to encourage industry to invest in green technology.
In an unusual step, the UN published the text of the four-page draft agreement, based on the first week of informal discussions, on its website over the weekend. It will now be argued over by the 190 countries present.
Observers said the draft would be repeatedly modified and updated through the week. A final version must be agreed by Friday.
The initial draft calls on countries to respond to the "unequivocal scientific evidence that preventing the worst effects of climate change will require [developed nations] to reduce emissions in a range of 25-40% below 1990 levels by 2020 and that global emissions of greenhouse gases need to peak in the next 10 to 15 years".
Harlan Watson, the senior climate negotiator for the US, said: "We have problems with defining the numbers up front. In our view that pre-judges the outcome of the negotiations over the next two years."
He said the US supported the concept of a "shared global goal" to address climate change but did not want the Bali meeting to discuss exact numbers.
The 25-40% figure is based on the work of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, due to be formally awarded the Nobel peace prize jointly with Al Gore today. Watson said the IPCC calculation was based on "many uncertainties".
Yvo de Boer, the head of the UN climate secretariat, said the 25-40% figure would be a "critical issue" at the talks. He said it was an important signpost to show where the world was heading in dealing with global warming.
(c) 2007 The Guardian
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.