Frustrated by local TV news outlets that run "commercials disguised as
news," an FCC commissioner wants to investigate stations that don't tell
viewers they may be watching corporate propaganda instead of independently
reported information.
KGO-TV, an ABC affiliate in San Francisco, was one of 46 stations in 22
states cited for improperly including video news releases, or VNRs, into news
stories, according to a report released Tuesday by two watchdog groups Center
for Media and Democracy and Free Press. Tuesday's report was a follow-up to an
April study by the same organizations that found that 77 stations nationally
-- including CBS 5-TV (KPIX) in San Francisco -- had improperly used VNRs.
Representatives of both stations acknowledged erroneously using them and called
them isolated incidents.
A VNR is a prepackaged segment that looks and sounds like journalistically
reported information but is produced by either a public relations firm or a
government body with a vested interest in the product or service being
described.
While media advocates say including prepackaged material may not seem as
serious when a TV news reporter is doing a fluffy feature piece on what kind of
lipstick to wear, the implications could be more dire if the journalist
broadcasts corporately produced information -- without critical examination
or identification -- when reporting on a new treatment for liver cancer.
Tuesday's six-month investigation included a story aired by a TV station
in Missouri that questioned global warming and was largely based on a VNR
created by oil industry lobbyists. The station didn't identify the source of
the material.
The Federal Communications Act requires broadcasters to inform their
audience "that such matter is sponsored, paid for or furnished, either in whole
or in part; and by whom or on whose behalf such consideration was supplied."
Failure to identify the source of a VNR is also an ethical violation. The
industry's Radio-Television News Directors Association guidelines on VNR usage
says: "news managers and producers should clearly disclose the origin of
information and label all material provided by corporate or other non-editorial
sources."
In April's report, the study found that one-third of the time, "stations
aired fake news stories in their entirety as their own reporting," according to
the Center for Media and Democracy.
"No wonder the public is having a hard time distinguishing between news
and propaganda," Federal Communications Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein said
Tuesday in response to the findings.
He was supported by fellow commissioner Michael Copps. "Americans have a
legal right to know that what appears to be independent news reports are
actually bought and paid for by a private corporation," Copps said.
Adelstein expressed frustration that stations haven't been cowed by the
FCC investigation into VNR usage begun in August and called for the federal
agency to investigate the new allegations. The agency sent letters of inquiry
to the 77 stations mentioned in the April report. Still, 10 of those stations
under investigation have used VNRs in the past six months, according to
Tuesday's report.
Last month, the Radio-Television News Directors Association asked the FCC
to halt its investigation into VNR usage, saying it had created a "chilling
effect" for stations. Because many stations had curtailed using the prepackaged
pieces, "viewers have lost access to video that might explain or illustrate the
promises of a newly released life-altering drug, or the potentially fatal
dangers posed by a common food," according to a letter the association filed
with the agency.
The industry association also criticized the April watchdog study, saying
that the number of VNR stories cited without disclosure was "hardly relevant"
given that more than 1 million local news stories aired over that period.
Among the incidents cited in Tuesday's report was a consumer news story
about rental cars that aired on San Francisco's KGO-TV in June. The story
included material from a VNR produced for Allstate Insurance without
identification.
KGO News director Kevin Keeshan said Tuesday that "this was a clear
violation of our policy on VNR usage" and that the segment producer involved
was "disciplined." The station has since changed its policy on VNR usage, now
requiring the approval of at least an executive producer at the station before
airing properly identified material from a VNR.
CBS 5-TV was cited in the April report for a January news story it
broadcast about the first inhalable insulin treatment approved by the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration. The report found that half of the story was pulled
from a VNR created for the drug's maker, Pfizer.
CBS 5-TV vice president and news director Dan Rosenheim said that "this
was a legitimate news story," but that the station failed to attribute the
material used to a VNR, which "was a departure from our policy." While
declining to say if the employees involved were disciplined, he said the matter
was addressed internally.
Both TV news industry standards and local news directors say there are
instances where properly identified VNRs can be ethically used without
compromising the news-gathering process. If a station is airing a story about a
new drug and needs footage of the production facility and can't get it on
deadline, a VNR could be useful, Rosenheim said.
Neither news director thought inappropriate VNR usage is a widespread
problem. Given all the national material it receives from ABC News and because
it is an affiliate of CNN, KGO-TV's Keeshan said, "we have way more material
than we can possibly put on television every day."
©2006 San Francisco Chronicle
###