Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community
We Can't Do It Without You!  
     
Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search
   
 
   Headlines  
 

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
 
US Drops Library Gag Order in Patriot Act Dispute
Published on Thursday, April 13, 2006 by Reuters
US Drops Library Gag Order in Patriot Act Dispute
 

The government has backed down in at least one battle over the Patriot Act by dropping a gag order imposed on a library that refuses to reveal a reader's borrowing habits.

The library, thought to be Connecticut, is resisting an FBI request to produce the records of one of its patrons because the agency refuses to identify the threat posed by the person.

The library sought to tell its story but was bound to secrecy under a former provision of the Patriot Act, which was dropped when Congress renewed the act this year.

The library's bid to identify itself received a boost when the Justice Department wrote to a federal appeals court on March 29 explaining that "the FBI has determined that it will not oppose that request."

The government had previously argued the FBI probe would be threatened if the name of the library was disclosed.

The American Civil Liberties Union, which announced the development on Wednesday, called it a victory in its campaign against what it considers a government intrusion of privacy.

"This calls into question every time the government has relied on national security to impose secrecy," said ACLU lawyer Ann Beeson. "The only reason to gag our clients was to stifle their free speech rights in the debate over the Patriot Act. The government flip-flop confirms our suspicions."

Once the necessary court procedures are complete, the ACLU plans to hold a news conference to introduce the librarians.

Meanwhile, the library's challenge to turning over the patron's records continues.

A Justice Department spokesman was not available for comment.

Congress passed the Patriot Act after the September 11 attacks in 2001 to help guard against terrorism, but civil libertarians fear it could lead to an abuse of power by giving the government legal cover to snoop on innocent Americans.

Copyright © 2006 Reuters Limited.

###

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article

 
     
 
 

CommonDreams.org is an Internet-based progressive news and grassroots activism organization, founded in 1997.
We are a nonprofit, progressive, independent and nonpartisan organization.

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search

To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

© Copyrighted 1997-2011