Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community
We Can't Do It Without You!  
     
Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search
   
 
   Headlines  
 

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
 
IRS Proposal Would Allow Tax Preparers to Sell Financial Information
Published on Thursday, March 23, 2006 by the Oregon Mail Tribune
IRS Proposal Would Allow Tax Preparers to Sell Financial Information
 
WASHINGTON — Consumer groups and privacy advocates are attacking proposed Internal Revenue Service rules that would spell out how tax-return preparers may legally sell financial information and other data from their clients’ returns.

It has long been a principle of tax administration that no unauthorized person can get such information, and that this assurance encourages taxpayers to file honest and complete returns. That notion is still a "fundamental underpinning" of IRS practice, Commissioner Mark Everson said Wednesday in an interview.

The IRS billed the proposal, issued in December, as improving privacy protections for taxpayers, detailing the steps for getting permission to use the information. But it has focused attention on a little-known fact: Although law forbids the unauthorized disclosure of taxpayer information, return-preparers have long been allowed to disclose it, even sell it, if they obtain their clients’ permission. Once the information goes out the door, taxpayers have little control over what happens to it.

The problem, said Evan Hendricks, publisher of the Privacy Times newsletter and other publications on privacy, is that "information about you is valuable in general, and the more detailed ... it is, the more valuable it is."

"The real danger here is that there’s going to be lot of incentive" for preparers to obtain the permission surreptitiously, such as by spreading a lot of papers in front of clients and asking them to sign them all, Hendricks said.

Jean Ann Fox of the Consumer Federation of America said that under the new rules taxpayers could be duped into releasing their information and run the "risk of having that information in database somewhere." That is "dangerous," she said, and "essentially turns tax-return information into a commodity for highest bidder."

The IRS said in proposing the new rules that it was updating regulations dating from the 1970s that had not contemplated electronic transmission and other business practices, including the "offshoring" of some tax-preparation work by some firms.

"Our concern was (preparers) were interpreting the regulations in a way to say (clients) don’t need to know that their returns are being prepared in India; it’s all by the same firm," Everson said. "There’s no doubt in my mind taxpayers are entitled to know if their return is being prepared overseas."

The rules also specify what a preparer must do to get permission from a taxpayer to disclose return information, up to and including the entire return. Specific language is required when a preparer requests permission, and also in the form given to the taxpayer to sign.

There is also language for obtaining the taxpayer’s permission to use the information within the preparer’s company or group of related companies. And there is a procedure for obtaining a taxpayer’s "signature" electronically.

The IRS proposal says that a preparer, for example, might ask permission to disclose that a client contributed to an IRA or that he would be getting a refund. Such information could be sold to a bank.

Several large tax-preparation companies have told the IRS that they oppose the new rules because they would make it too difficult for them to obtain permission to sell clients’ information.

As the government’s priorities have shifted to national security and revenue collection, there is more debate over how strict privacy rules should be.

The IRS recently awarded the first contracts to private debt collectors, a strategy authorized by Congress to increase collection of unpaid taxes. The debt collectors are barred from having tax information beyond what is owed, but critics say they worry about other information leaking out and about possible abusive practices by collection agents.

Everson said the private collectors "extend the reach" of the IRS, and are subject to the same privacy rules as agency employees.

He said calls for increased access to IRS data in areas such as immigration enforcement or federal procurement should be debated carefully. While there might be public-policy benefits in one area, there might also be "a damaging impact" on tax collections, he said.

Last week, Everson himself "teed up" the issue of the different ways corporations report income to the IRS and financial regulators.

"We have two system that are in conflict with each other — book accounting and tax return preparation. Book accounting seeks to maximize earnings to drive up share value; tax return preparation seeks to drive down earnings, reduce taxes and maximize cash flow," he said.

"Clearly tax compliance would be helped by great transparency," such as disclosure of corporate returns or parts of them, "but there are very real public policy interests (in) continuing privacy. It comes down to weighting various factors," Everson said.

Copyright © 1997-2006 Mail Tribune, Inc.

###

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article

 
     
 
 

CommonDreams.org is an Internet-based progressive news and grassroots activism organization, founded in 1997.
We are a nonprofit, progressive, independent and nonpartisan organization.

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search

To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

Copyrighted 1997-2011