Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community
We Can't Do It Without You!  
     
Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search
   
 
   Headlines  
 

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
 
South Africa Slams US over AIDS Drug; 'Africans used as Guinea Pigs'
Published on Saturday, December 18, 2004 by the Associated Press
South Africa Slams US over AIDS Drug; 'Africans used as Guinea Pigs'
by Alexandra Zavis
 

JOHANNESBURG, South Africa—President Thabo Mbeki's ruling party yesterday published a stinging attack on top U.S. health officials, accusing them of treating Africans like "guinea pigs'' and lying to promote a key AIDS drug.

The criticism reinforces fears of doctors and activists that new questions about the testing of nevirapine could halt use of the drug that's credited with protecting thousands of African babies from catching HIV from their mothers.

The article, published in the online journal ANC Today, was responding to Associated Press reports this week that U.S. health officials withheld criticism of a nevirapine study before U.S. President George W. Bush launched a 2002 plan to distribute the drug in Africa.

Documents obtained by AP show Dr. Edmund C. Tramont, chief of the National Institutes of Health's AIDS division, rewrote an NIH report to omit negative conclusions about the way a U.S.-funded drug trial was conducted in Uganda, and later ordered the research to continue over the objections of his staff. Tramont's staff worried about record-keeping problems, violations of federal patient safeguards and other issues at the Uganda research site.

"Dr. Tramont was happy that the peoples of Africa should be used as guinea pigs, given a drug he knew very well should not be prescribed," the article said. "In other words, they entered into a conspiracy with a pharmaceutical company to tell lies to promote the sales of nevirapine in Africa, with absolutely no consideration of the health impact of those lies on the lives of millions of Africans.''

Smuts Ngonyama, an African National Congress spokesperson and editor of the journal, said the article was an opinion piece by a member and didn't reflect official party policy.

Dr. H. Clifford Lane, the NIH's No. 2 infectious disease specialist and one of Tramont's bosses, has said an internal review cleared Tramont of scientific misconduct. Lane said Tramont changed the report because he was more experienced than his safety experts and had an "honest difference of opinion." Tramont has argued that Africans in the midst of an AIDS crisis deserved some leniency in meeting tough U.S. safety standards.

AIDS activists in South Africa worried that the ruling party's statements could halt the use of single-dose nevirapine before alternatives are available.

© Copyright 2004 Associated Press

###

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article

 
     
 
 

CommonDreams.org is an Internet-based progressive news and grassroots activism organization, founded in 1997.
We are a nonprofit, progressive, independent and nonpartisan organization.

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search

To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

© Copyrighted 1997-2009