Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community
We Can't Do It Without You!  
Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
Kerry Faces Write-In Candidate Opposing His Vote on Iraq Force
Published on Tuesday, October 29, 2002 by the Boston Globe
Kerry Faces Write-In Candidate Opposing His Vote on Iraq Force
by Glen Johnson
WASHINGTON - A Cambridge arms control specialist and peace activist is mounting a write-in campaign against Senator John F. Kerry, hoping to register public disapproval for his recent vote authorizing President Bush to use military force against Iraq.

Randall C. Forsberg (, a Democrat with a doctorate from MIT who serves as director of the Institute for Defense and Disarmament Studies, conceded yesterday that she does not have a strong chance of unseating Kerry next week. Instead, she said she hopes that the votes she receives will send an antiwar message.

Forsberg has registered her candidacy with the secretary of state's office so that any vote for her will be tallied under her name rather than lumped into an ''Other'' category when ballots are counted.

''I think it's important for every person in Massachusetts who opposes war in Iraq to vote for me,'' Forsberg said. ''It won't only send a message to Kerry, but also sends a message nationally that there are an awful lot of peple who are opposed to war in Iraq.

''Iraq does not have nuclear weapons,'' she said. ''I think for the United States to conduct a unilateral war against Iraq is the worst thing the government can do for the country at this time. It undermines international law. It hurts the economy. We will occupy a country and take on its oil fields and add to our superpower status in a threatening manner. For all those reasons, it's likely to increase terrorist attacks on US citizens and interests abroad.''

Kerry has no Republican opponent in his bid for a fourth term. His only other challenger is Michael E. Cloud of Wayland, the Libertarian Party nominee.

In a statement, Kerry said: ''While we agree that war is a last resort and that we must act with the international community, I am convinced that Iraq's weapons of mass destruction pose a serious threat to this country and to the world. I continue to believe that a tough resolution combined with the hard work of diplomacy is the best way for the UN to finally hold Saddam Hussein accountable.''

The Massachusetts Democrat announced Oct. 9 that he would support a congressional resolution authorizing the use of force, if necessary, to ensure there are inspections for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Kerry announced his decision after spending months criticizing the administration's military response to the Sept. 11 terrorist attack, its handling of fighting between Israel and the Palestinians, and its early threats of military action against Iraq.

Instead, the senator counseled diplomacy, especially involvement of the United Nations and a multinational approach to any military action. In his speech announcing his support for the Bush administration, Kerry said the Democrats could claim credit for pushing the president into accepting that approach.

''That shift has made it possible, in my judgment, for the United States Senate to move forward with greater unity, having asked and begun to answer the questions that best defend our troops and protect our national security,'' he said.

Kerry opposed a similar resolution in 1991 that authorized military force in response to Iraq's occupation of Kuwait. The switch raised questions about whether the senator was changing policy to bolster his expected candidacy for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2004. All of the other expected Democratic candidates, except for Governor Howard Dean of Vermont, voted in favor of the latest resolution on Iraq.

''The safer vote was to vote with the president, because in most states, Democrats would have paid a price from Republicans for being soft on defense,'' said William Schneider of the American Enterprise Institute. ''It's a vote they didn't want to cast. It puts them all on the spot. And it is angering some liberals. He's not facing a Republican opponent, but now it's from some of his own Democrats.''

Forsberg, 59, said that after graduating from Columbia University in 1965, she moved to Sweden and worked from 1968 through 1974 at the International Peace Research Institute in Stockholm. In 1980 she founded her arms control institute and wrote the ''Call to Halt the Nuclear Arms Race,'' which became a manifesto for the nuclear freeze campaign. She received a MacArthur Foundation Fellowship, the so-called genius grant, in 1983 and a doctoral degree from MIT in 1997.

Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company


Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article

  is an Internet-based progressive news and grassroots activism organization, founded in 1997.
We are a nonprofit, progressive, independent and nonpartisan organization.

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search

To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

Copyrighted 1997-2011