Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community
We Can't Do It Without You!  
     
Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search
   
 
   Headlines  
 

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
 
 
International Criminal Court Close to Reality
Published on Friday, February 1, 2002 by One World/US
International Criminal Court Close to Reality
by Jim Lobe
 
The International Criminal Court (ICC)--the proposed forum for trying alleged perpetrators of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity--moved a major step closer to reality this week when the government of Estonia became the 50th country to ratify the court's founding 1998 treaty.

Estonia's action means that only 10 more countries must ratify and deposit their ratifications with the United Nations before the Rome Statute for the International Criminal Court takes effect and the ICC comes into existence.

"This is quite a milestone," said Richard Dicker, who has been following progress in establishing the ICC for New York-based Human Rights Watch. "I think we'll have 60 before the end of June and possibly a good deal sooner," he added.

Europe is so far the region with the largest number of countries that have ratified the statute, including all but a small handful of members of the 15-nation European Union. A substantial number of nations in West and Southern Africa, the Pacific, Latin America, and the Caribbean have also deposited their ratifications.

The statute has been signed by 139 nations to date, and, in addition to the 50 who have ratified it, about two dozen more are in the process of gaining ratification powers from their parliaments.

When the statute was first presented, only seven countries voted against it, including China, Israel, Iraq, and the United States.

In his last days in office, however, former President Bill Clinton--who had opposed it largely as a result of pressure from Republican lawmakers and the Pentagon--changed his mind and signed it to "reaffirm our strong support for international accountability and for bringing to justice perpetrators of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity."

But Clinton did not submit it to the Senate for ratification, and his successor, President George W. Bush, has indicated no interest in doing so.

Nonetheless, his administration has not actively lobbied other governments against ratification, as many ICC advocates and human rights activists had feared.

Indeed, the administration last month helped persuade Republicans in Congress to drop the so-called American Servicemembers Protection Act (ASPA) from the Defense Appropriations bill that would have barred all cooperation by local, state, or federal authorities with the ICC.

The ASPA also barred committing U.S. troops to peacekeeping missions unless they were explicitly exempted from possible prosecution by the ICC in advance. The act even authorized the president to use force in order to free U.S. and allied officials or troops if they were detained by the ICC.

Congress, however, did pass other legislation, later signed into law by Bush, that bans the use of government funds to cooperate with the ICC during the current fiscal year.

Republicans and some Democrats have opposed the ICC on the grounds that there are not enough safeguards in the statute to protect U.S. soldiers and officials from frivolous or politically-motivated prosecutions.

But advocates have argued that elaborate constraints on prosecuting powers were included in the statute precisely to reassure Washington about those concerns. Among other provisions, the ICC would only be able to take up a case after it had concluded that the government involved was either unable or unwilling to investigate or prosecute it on its own.

With the exception of Turkey, all of Washington's closest military allies in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) have signed the statute and either ratified it or are actively pursuing ratification. After initially opposing it, Israel has also signed the statute.

Still, several significant powers, especially in Asia, have declined even to sign the statute. Besides China, they include Japan, India, Pakistan, and Indonesia.

ICC supporters are hoping that, as the goal of 60 ratifications gets closer, many countries which have been hostile or on the fence, including even the U.S., will come around.

"If America wants to remain a leader in pursuing international justice for the victims of genocide and other heinous crimes, the U.S. government must figure out how to work with this court, not against it," said Heather Hamilton, program director at the World Federalist Association, which chairs a coalition of groups that favors U.S. ratification.

Copyright © 2002 OneWorld.net

###

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article

 
     
 
 

CommonDreams.org is an Internet-based progressive news and grassroots activism organization, founded in 1997.
We are a nonprofit, progressive, independent and nonpartisan organization.

Home | About Us | Donate | Signup | Archives | Search

To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

Copyrighted 1997-2011