CAMBRIDGE, Mass. --
Less than a week after the highest court in Massachusetts ruled that
gay marriages are permissible under the state constitution, this city is
poised to become the first in the nation to recognize same-sex marriages.
Members of the city council say they will ignore a warning from
Republican Gov. Mitt Romney to table the issue while the state Legislature
crafts a response to the court's ruling. And those council members say they
have the votes to approve a resolution tonight condoning the unions.
"When you protect a small group of people's rights, you protect all
people's right," said Councilor Denise Simmons. "We're doing the right thing."
The ruling from the Supreme Judicial Court gave the Legislature 180 days
to amend the state's marriage laws to include same-sex couples. Romney has
threatened to reject marriage licenses issued to any gay couples before the
expiration of that six-month period.
"I would hope that any city or any licensing authority would respect the
decision of the court," said Attorney General Thomas Reilly. "The Legislature
has some time here to deal with that."
But the councilors of Cambridge, a liberal city on the Charles River and
home of Harvard University, are not waiting for permission to act. Simmons
pledged to defy Romney's threat and take up the resolution tonight.
National gay rights groups have descended upon Massachusetts to lobby
lawmakers to comply with last Tuesday's ruling and permit gay marriage
throughout the state. The decision sets the stage for gay marriage legislation
that would surpass domestic partnership rights codified in California, Vermont,
and other states.
The National Center for Lesbian Rights, a San Francisco-based civil
rights group, celebrated the decision, calling it a "monumental" victory.
"Things will never be the same," the group said.
"Nothing short of marriage can provide the protections, obligations and
benefits of marriage," said Winnie Stachelberg, political director of Human
Rights Campaign, an advocacy group in Washington.
So far, Cambridge is the only Massachusetts city considering an immediate
policy change following the ruling, said Linda E. Hutchenrider, president of
the Massachusetts Town Clerks' Association.
Even in Provincetown, a Cape Cod community in which 701 gay couples have
registered since 1993, the assistant town clerk, Aaron Leventman, said he has
informed more than 20 people since Tuesday that they remain ineligible for
marriage licenses.
"We've been getting calls from people asking if they can get married
today," he said. "People from all over the country will come here to get
married. It has the reputation of being a gay mecca."
The marriage proposal in Cambridge has four sponsors on the nine-member
council; it needs one additional vote to gain passage.
Simmons, who is openly gay, and Councilor Brian Murphy submitted the
proposal on Tuesday, hours after the court ruling. On Wednesday, two other
councilors, Kenneth Reeves and Marjorie Decker, endorsed the measure. Decker
and Simmons said they believe the fifth vote is certain.
The city has a history of advocating for gay rights. In 1992, the Council
passed an ordinance granting healthcare to the domestic partners and children
of gay employees. The policy stood until last year, when a judge ruled it
illegal, leaving 100 families without medical benefits.
Decker said Tuesday's ruling means benefits will be returned to those
families. "I would be surprised if this didn't pass close to unanimous," she
said.
Fifty percent of Massachusetts residents surveyed for a Boston Globe/WBZ-
TV poll released Sunday said they agreed with the Supreme Judicial Court
ruling, while 38 percent opposed it. A separate Boston Sunday Herald poll
found 49 percent said they support legalizing gay marriage, while 38 percent
oppose it. Both polls, conducted after Tuesday's decision, had margins of
sampling error of plus or minus 5 percentage points.
The polls appear to show more support for gay couples in Massachusetts
than the nation as a whole. A recent national poll by the Pew Research Center
for People and the Press found Americans oppose legalizing gay marriage, 59
percent to 32 percent. That survey, conducted Oct. 15-19, had a margin of
sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
Sue Hyde, 51, said she and her partner of 18 years, who are raising two
children, had little interest in getting married in Vermont or Canada. But the
court ruling, she said, has created an opportunity.
"We've discussed it over the years, never with the idea we'd be able to
do it in our home state," she said. "It's an exciting possibility."
©2003 San Francisco Chronicle
###