President George Bush is seen by a third of Britons as a bigger threat to world
safety than Saddam Hussein, according to a new poll conducted by a senior US Republican
and due to be broadcast today.
But most of those questioned by the polling organizationYouGov
say they remain open minded, and ready to be convinced about the justification
for an attack on Iraq.
The weighted poll of 3,200 people throughout the country was conducted for
Channel 4 by Frank Luntz, a senior Republican strategist, based on the YouGov
sample.
Similar polling has been undertaken by Downing Street as it contemplates how
to sell a war on Iraq.
The Channel 4 poll found that a third of the British public have no trust at
all in Mr Bush, and many actually fear him. In a straight choice between Mr Bush
and President Saddam as to who poses the greater threat to world peace, 32% said
Mr Bush and 49% said President Saddam. Almost half see Mr Blair as Mr Bush's lapdog,
with the figure even higher among the under-30s.
Almost two-thirds of people said the only reason the US has targeted President
Saddam is because he threatens US control of the Middle East - only a quarter
feel it is because the Iraqi leader is a threat to world peace.
Blame for British casualties in a war with Iraq will be placed with Mr Blair
himself, according to 21% of those polled.
Commenting on his findings, Mr Luntz said: "I would suggest that [Mr Blair]
ring up the broadcast media and say, 'Keep President Bush, keep Dick Cheney, keep
all Americans with these American accents off television', because it's not helping
his case."
Despite the poll findings, the British government refused to tone down the
bellicose rhetoric. The foreign secretary, Jack Straw, yesterday warned President
Saddam that he will face confrontation if he fails to disclose a full list of
the country's alleged weapons of mass destruction.
Having accepted last Friday's UN resolution, the next hurdle for Iraq will
be to provide the list by December 8.
In a speech in London yesterday, Mr Straw said: "The message for Saddam Hussein
is this: resolve this crisis peacefully by complying fully with UN inspectors
and providing a full and complete disclosure of your WMD [weapons of mass
destruction] holdings by 8 December, or choose confrontation."
Iraq could claim in its declaration that it has some of the components to make
weapons of mass destruction but has not actually made them.
But Mr Straw said: "The history of UN weapons inspections in Iraq is littered
with examples of deceit, evasion, intimidation and harassment. I hope even Iraq
will recognize the consequences of any repeat. If Saddam fails to cooperate fully,
then he faces force."
Mr Straw used the speech to announce that the Foreign Office is to embark on
a fundamental review of foreign policy. This is to take account of relations with
the Muslim world, weapons of mass destruction and other issues pushed to the forefront
by the September 11 attacks. The results of the review are scheduled to be published
early next year.
Mr Straw said the aim of the review was to establish long-term strategic priorities.
He said it would have four central planks: tackling the threat of terrorism and
weapons of mass destruction; European security, especially the establishment of
stronger ties with Russia; strengthening international organizations, such as
the UN, and global economic development.
© Guardian Newspapers Limited 2002
###