WASHINGTON, Jan. 6 -- United States officials said today that American spies
had worked undercover on teams of United Nations arms inspectors ferreting out
secret Iraqi weapons programs.
Iraq has long condemned the inspectors as tools of American intelligence.
In October it issued a statement saying it would never cooperate with United Nations
teams riddled with ''American spies and agents.''
United States officials said American intelligence agencies provided information
and technology to the United Nations Special Commission, known as Unscom. In turn,
they said, the United States and other nations received information on Iraqi weapons
programs from the inspectors.
By being part of the team, the Americans gained a first-hand knowledge of
the investigation and a protected presence inside Baghdad.
Intelligence-gathering devices supplied to the inspectors by Washington gave
the United States a better understanding of the sites at which Iraq developed
and concealed weapons of mass destruction, American officials said.
The commission has been a unique attempt by the United Nations to establish
an international intelligence-gathering and analysis operation. Its mission was
to uncover Iraqi weapons programs that continued after the 1991 Persian Gulf war.
Scientists, military officers, diplomats and other professionals serve on
the commission. The United States included some intelligence officers, using diplomatic
cover or other professional identities, to gather intelligence independently,
according to the officials.
American officials did not say how many spies served on the commission or
describe their roles.
The disclosure that American spies had worked as inspectors came after The
Boston Globe reported today that such agents had used the team as a cover to spy
on President Saddam Hussein.
The Washington Post also reported today that the commission had worked with
American spy agencies to gain intelligence that was used to undermine the Iraqi
leader.
American officials also said today that a former American United Nations inspector
was misinformed when he said the United States had taken over a United Nations
intelligence operation in Iraq.
American officials said that while the United States had participated in the
United Nations teams' intelligence-gathering operation, they had not taken it
over. They strongly rejected reports that the teams had been used as a tool of
American intelligence, as did Secretary General Kofi Annan and the commission's
current and former chairmen.
''We not only have no convincing evidence of these allegations,'' said Fred
Eckhard, the spokesman for Mr. Annan, ''we have no evidence of any kind.''
A senior Administration official said: ''Unscom does not have an indigenous
intelligence capability; that was provided by member states. The information it
gathered was used to help break Saddam's concealment effort, and the information
was passed on to United Nations Security Council members.''
In an interview, Scott Ritter, a former United States Marine intelligence
officer, raised the question of whether the inspectors improperly aided United
States intelligence in ways that threatened the inspectors' independence, or opened
them up to charges of spying for Washington.
American officials said today that Mr. Ritter was describing a secret United
States-assisted United Nations intelligence program that he did not fully understand.
Mr. Ritter said the inspectors had developed ''methodologies,'' which he refused
to describe, that helped them understand how Iraqi security services concealed
arms programs. The same security services and methods of concealment were also
used to protect Mr. Hussein, he said.
Mr. Ritter said his inspection team ''had a tremendous success using these
methodologies'' in March. A few weeks later, he said, American officials approached
Richard Butler, an Australian who is chairman of the United Nations commission.
''In April, the U.S. went to Butler and wanted to take over a certain portion
of the system of how we track these weapons,'' he said. ''I wanted to make sure
it was only for tracking weapons, but the U.S. wanted to cut me out.
''I could no longer guarantee that the methodology would be used'' for weapons
inspections alone, and not to benefit United States military and intelligence
agencies, he said.
''Butler will have to convince people that what the U.S. did was for Unscom,''
said Mr. Ritter. ''I think we were given assurances the information would not
be misused,'' he said. But, he added, he believed that the United States ''used
Butler.''
''I think they set him up,'' he said.
Mr. Ritter resigned in August, saying the United States and the United Nations
had undermined the inspectors.
A Government official familiar with the dispute said Mr. Ritter was ill-informed,
explaining that there had been a shift in the commission's intelligence-gathering
methods last spring.
''There was a period when Mr. Ritter was familiar with these methods,'' the
official said. ''The methods have since gotten better, but Mr. Ritter wasn't totally
witting of what was done.''
And a White House official lashed out at Mr. Ritter today, saying his allegations
had delivered a pointless propaganda victory to Iraq.
Mr. Butler said the commission had asked for more advanced technology after
discovering in 1995 the sophisticated lies and methods of concealment that Iraq
had used to hide its weapons programs and missile projects.
''I want to say this with all the force that I can: We have never accepted
or used any of that assistance for any other purpose'' than disarming Iraq, Mr.
Butler said.
''Have we facilitated spying?'' he said. ''Are we spies? Absolutely not.''
Mr. Butler's predecessor, Rolf Ekeus, now Sweden's Ambassador to the United
States, said the teams had ''exclusively devoted their activities in Iraq to identifying
Iraq's holdings of weapons of mass destruction.''
In an interview, Mr. Ekeus also said no eavesdropping equipment had been installed
by the United States to spy on President Hussein or on the troops who protect
him. Mr. Butler also denied that any such eavesdropping took place.
Monitoring the efforts of Iraq's Special Republican Guard and Special Security
Services to conceal clandestine weapons programs might have led to Iraqi protests
that these troops were being spied on.
The inspectors were withdrawn in December, hours before American and British
attacks on Iraq. Mr. Hussein has said they will not be allowed to return unless
the Special Commission is restructured and Mr. Butler is replaced.
Some United Nations diplomats and officials say Mr. Butler's position may
be stronger now because officials have been forced to rally publicly behind him.
Mr. Annan was reported to be particularly enraged by assertions from unnamed
sources quoted by The Washington Post who said he was suspicious of Mr. Butler
and the commission.
Mr. Eckhard also said the Secretary General, who has sometimes been critical
of Mr. Butler's blunt style, was not putting pressure on Mr. Butler to resign.
Copyright 1999 The New York Times Company
###