EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Pregnant Anti-War Soldier Sent to Prison
- The Sick Madness of Tom Friedman's Culture
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- You and Your Family Are Guinea Pigs for the Chemical Corporations
- After Boston, Eyes-Wide Open Hope?
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
Popular content
Today's Top News
Report: Israel Could Attack Iran Just Before US Elections
Report says Netanyahu has promised not to carry out an attack on Iran before the fall
An Israeli attack on Iran could occur in the crucial weeks leading up to the US presidential election this fall, according to a report from an Israeli newspaper.
(photo: Jim Watson/AFP) The paper, Maariv, a daily Hebrew language newspaper based in Tel Aviv, quotes anonymous officials who said that Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has assured the United States that it would hold off on an attack on Iran until at least the fall. Netanyahu, however, would not promise US officials he would hold off on a strike until after the November elections, the article reports. Due to weather that would complicate air strikes in Iran, this gives Israel a small window of time to make an attack, and could result in such a bombing campaign occuring right before the elections. This scenario could complicate President Obama's re-election campaign and give Israel leverage in negotiations with the US.
"Since most military analysts believe that Israel would almost certainly prefer to carry out a complex and difficult long-range attack on Iran in a period when the skies above the target are cloudless, that either means Israel has agreed to postpone the potential strike for at least another eleven months or that the window of opportunity is open now for September or October," reports Haaretz, an English language daily newspaper in Israel. "In other words, during the crucial final stages of the American presidential elections campaign.
* * *
Haaretz: Small window of opportunity for a strike on Iran
The headline of today's Maariv is extremely important, if true. It quotes American officials who say that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has promised not to carry out an attack on Iran before the fall.
Since most military analysts believe that Israel would almost certainly prefer to carry out a complex and difficult long-range attack on Iran in a period when the skies above the target are cloudless, that either means Israel has agreed to postpone the potential strike for at least another eleven months or that the window of opportunity is open now for September or October. In other words, during the crucial final stages of the American presidential elections campaign.
This seems to be the fear of Maariv's un-named administration sources, complaining that "Netanyahu refused to commit that Israel would not attack Iran before the elections in November 2012 and agreed to wait with a military operation only until the fall."
According to the paper, Netanyahu's reasoning is that "after fall, the Iranian nuclear installations will be in 'the immunity zone' from an Israeli strike and Israel will lose its independence to decide on military action."
We have no way of verifying this report but it does tally with what Barack Obama said two months ago - "I don't think that Israel has made a decision on what they need to do." And of course, it fits in with Netanyahu's tendency to play the internal American political arena.
Announcing that Israel may decide to attack Iran at the worst possible political timing puts pressure on Obama, and could potentially lead to some valuable American concessions to Israel, in exchange for an eventual commitment not to strike.
# # #
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

114 Comments so far
Show All"Today Bluffdale is home to one of the nation’s largest sects of polygamists, the Apostolic United Brethren, with upwards of 9,000 members. […] But new pioneers have quietly begun moving into the area, secretive outsiders who say little and keep to themselves. Like the pious polygamists, they are focused on deciphering cryptic messages that only they have the power to understand. […] Rather than Bibles, prophets, and worshippers, this temple will be filled with servers, computer intelligence experts, and armed guards. And instead of listening for words flowing down from heaven, these newcomers will be secretly capturing, storing, and analyzing vast quantities of words and images hurtling through the world’s telecommunications networks." http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/
We'll meet again, Don't know where, Don't know when, But I know We'll meet again Some sunny day. Keep smiling through Just like you Always do Till the blue skies Drive the dark clouds Far away.
Guess it's time for me to check and replenish my precious bodily fluids......
Bill from Saginaw
The crazy thing is that this IS as crazy as Dr. Strangelove (I never did learn to stop worrying and love the bomb)
I guess it would be safe for Egypt to have nuclear facilities, being upwind and all.
You got me rocking and a reeling, and a reeling and a rocking, bomb Iran, bomb... bomb.. bomb, bomb Iran. -- John McCain
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-zoPgv_nYg
"Our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children's future. And we are all mortal." John Fitzgerald Kennedy
JFK II - The Bush Connection (2003)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsMKMMlleOE
...peace...
With that statement of intent to attack, I trust all involved realise that Iran now has the absolute right to pre-emptively defend itself at any time of its choosing.
If we lived in a just world Israel would deal with the consequences of these types of actions alone and they would quickly learn that they have to act like civilized human beings and good world citizens. As of now, they are a bully who can only be a bully because the real bully is behind them backing them up. If we were to go away or make them deal with the consequences of their actions alone they'd learn quickly to shut the hell up and learn to be more peaceful. We don't live in a just world or a rational country, so this goon will probably drag us into the abyss along with his own country.
The US supplies Israel with weapons and nuclear technology, as well as providing social and political cover along with billions of dollars necessary to keep it's economy afloat..
Therefore the US, via it's proxy in the Middle East is the single greatest threat to world peace.
If we as a species expect to survive, the US must then be forcibly disarmed and economically bankrupted, which will also bring about the end of the present iteration of the mental illness called 'Civilization'. QED.
The IAF US-supplied F15/F16 are all-weather aircraft that would use US-supplied precision guided munitions on targets illuminated either from the air or ground, so the above statement is just BS. If an attack was necessary, weather does not factor in, you just deal with it and take your lumps.
Ergo sum, an attack is not necessary, but just a game to play (at the expense of innocent lives).
North Korea got it's nuclear knowhow from Pakistan, a US ally, via one Dr. Ahmed Khan. They tested exactly ONE device that was more or less a the shooter's equivalent of a squib load, and didn't detonate properly.
It's rocket (not too dissimilar from US Gemini models) took three weeks to assemble and fuel. As far as threats go, a three week lead time is plenty of time to walk in and politely tell them to knock it the fuck off.
Iran has stated publicly, repeatedly that it has NO INTEREST in building a nuclear weapon, and even went to the extent of issuing a 'fatwa' or religious decree forbidding nuclear weapons research on pain of death.
The only country in the Middle East with nuclear weapons capability is ISRAEL, who has a documented record of airstrikes against nuclear facilities in neighboring nations, under US cover and protection.
And the whole 'Pearl Harbor' thing? Yeah, the US Government and Military had broken Japan's 'Purple' code, and knew exactly when the attack was going to take place. They used that event to dispose of obsolete battleships in a calculated PR move to make budgetary room to build the new more strategically advantageous aircraft carriers.
Do some reading and research beyond 'Rush Limbaugh: You're All a Bunch of Ignorant Dumbasses I Manipulate and Make Money Off Of.'
yes, this is true.
FDR Pearl Harbor Conspiracy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnBgQB5L2i0
...peace...
...peace... ...
Reports from the Iran-Contra days claimed that Ronald Reagan cut a deal with the Ayatollah Khomeini. Khomeini was to hold American embassy workers hostage through the elections. We have heard reports that the Ayatollah was given a cake and a Bible as gifts. We know that the Iranian hostages were released within hours of Reagan taking the oath of office.
I could go in two directions here. First, I could wonder where else Republicans conspire with foreigners to hold Americans hostage. Second, I could say, isn't Republican conspiracy to commit hostage-taking for a year or more a crime against the whole body of humanity under the Geneva Convention, which the U.S. Senate ratified so that the U.S. Constitution declares it to be U.S. law equally with bills passed in the more familiar way through both houses?
If you are related to one of these particular unjailed criminals, hey, I'm sorry for you. Keep your mouth shut at Christmas dinner.
Now, as for starting a war to win an election, isn't that much more important than starting a war to protect our bananas for Chiquita or our oil for British Petroleum?