Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Neurotoxic Pesticides Helping to Decimate Bee Populations, Studies Indicate
Two studies show that a class of chemicals known as neonicotinoids created disorientation among bees and caused colonies to lose weight, which may have contributed to a mysterious die-off.
Two new studies released on Thursday show that industrial pesticides -- specifically chemical neurotoxins called 'neonicotinoids' -- have robust negative impact on the honey bees' ability to navigate and sufficiently reproduce. Previous studies have shown that insecticides may play a role in 'colony collapse disorder,' a term that describes huge bee die-offs in recent years, the direct and specific cause of which has remained elusive to scientists, but these studies are unique for being conducted in the field as opposed to in laboratory conditions.
A honeybee pollinates a flower in a citrus grove just coming into blossom. (Photograph: David Silverman/Getty Images) "People had found pretty trivial effects in lab and greenhouse experiments, but we have shown they can translate into really big effects in the field. This has transformed our understanding," Prof David Goulson, at the University of Stirling and leader of one of the research teams told The Guardian. "If it's only one metre from where they forage in a lab to their nest, even an unwell bee can manage that."
One scientist, who lauded the study for its role in furthering understanding of the bees decline, also noted that the study should aware the public that these same chemical pesticides could be having similar impacts on other species as well. "There's a general phenomenon of pollinator decline — bats, bird, butterflies, all kinds of things," he said.
* * *
From Science Magazine: Field Research on Bees Raises Concern About Low-Dose Pesticides
Five years ago, bees made headlines when a mysterious condition called colony collapse disorder decimated honey bee colonies in parts of the United States. Now bees are poised to be in the news again, this time because of evidence that systemic insecticides, a common way to protect crops, indirectly harm these important pollinators. Two field studies reported online this week in Science document problems. In bumble bees, exposure to one such chemical leads to a dramatic loss of queens and could help explain the insects' decline. In honey bees, another insecticide interferes with the foragers' ability to find their way back to the hive. Researchers say these findings are cause for concern and will increase pressure to improve pesticide testing and regulation.
* * *
Wired.com reports:
Bumblebees exposed to neonicotinoids in a study produced 85% fewer queens per colony and gained 8% to 12% less weight, on average. “If that went on for years, the consequences could be pretty dramatic,” said David Goulson of the University of Stirling in Scotland, who led the study. (David Goulson, University of Stirling / July 31, 2004)
“It’s pretty damning,” said David Goulson, a bee biologist at Scotland’s University of Stirling. “It’s clear evidence that they’re likely to be having an effect on both honeybees and bumblebees.”
Neonicotinoids emerged in the mid-1990s as a relatively less-toxic alternative to human-damaging pesticides. They soon became wildly popular, and were the fastest-growing class of pesticides in modern history. Their effects on non-pest insects, however, were unknown.
In the mid-2000s, beekeepers in the United States and elsewhere started to report sharp and inexplicable declines in honeybee populations. Researchers called the phenomenon colony collapse disorder. It was also found in bumblebees, and in some regions now threatens to extirpate bees altogether.
Many possible causes were suggested, from viruses and mites to industrial beekeeping practices and climate change. Pesticides, in particular neonicotinoids, also came under scrutiny.
Leaked internal reports by the Environmental Protection Agency showed that industry-run studies used to demonstrate some neonicotinoids’ environmental safety were shoddy and unreliable. Other researchers found signs that neonicotinoids, while they didn’t kill bees outright, affected their ability to learn and navigate.
* * *
The Guardian report adds:
The pesticides investigated in the new studies - insect neurotoxins called neonicotinoids - are applied to seeds and flow through the plants' whole system. The environmental advantage of this is it reduces pesticide spraying but chemicals end up in the nectar and pollen on which bees feed. Goulson's group studied an extremely widely used type called imidacloprid, primarily manufactured by Bayer CropScience, and registered for use on over 140 crops in 120 countries.
Bumblebees were fed the toxin at the same level found in treated rape plants and found that these colonies were about 10% smaller than those not exposed to the insecticide. Most strikingly, the exposed colonies lost almost all of their ability to produce queens, which are the only bee to survive the winter and establish new colonies. "There was a staggering magnitude of effect," said Goulson. "This is likely to have a substantial population-level impact."
The French team analysed the effect on honey bees of a new generation neonicotinoid, called thiamethoxam and manufactured by Syngenta. They fitted tiny electronic tags to over 650 bees and monitored their activity around the hive. Those exposed to "commonly encountered" levels of thiamethoxam suffered high mortality, with up to a third of the bees failing to return. "They disappeared in much higher numbers than expected," said Henry. Previous scientific work has shown insect neurotoxins may cause memory, learning, and navigation problems in bees.
* * *
Jeff Pettis of the Department of Agriculture's bee research lab in Beltsville, Md., who wasn't involved in the studies, praised the bumblebee report in particular for highlighting that honeybees aren't the only ones that may suffer from sublethal doses of pesticides. He predicted that the effects on bee reproduction would raise red flags for regulators at the Environmental Protection Agency.
"There's a general phenomenon of pollinator decline — bats, bird, butterflies, all kinds of things," he said.
# # #
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


41 Comments so far
Show AllYour comments are the perfect segue into what I was going to write.
If we just use our common sense, we know that all the stressors we are piling on to the world with our "way of life" are overwhelming the whole system. Common sense dictates that in a finite world there are limits.
In another article on CD it is reported that there seems to be a link between the rise in autism and environmental factors.
How much more proof do we need of cause and effect?
But my point isn't to point fingers. My point is to get people to see that waiting for the dysfunction in our system to fix itself is foolish in the extreme. By waiting, aren't we merely giving over whatever control we have to the dysfunctional system?
If we KNOW what the deal is, if we have ALREADY sussed much of this stuff out, then it seems it is UP TO US to change our own lives in response. If we don't, aren't we just part of the larger dysfunction?
I'm not saying that the system is fair or friendly and I'm not trying to point out where the fault lies - I'm merely saying that heaping all our energies on pointing to something we don't have much control over is wasting time. And time, it seems, is something we don't have much of.
What we do have control over is how we live our lives and whether we contribute to health or dysfunction. That is something consequential. It's always been so.
It is IMPERATIVE that we change our voting pattern. We must vote out EVERY SINGLE PERSON in our Federal government. The only way to change the situation is to kick out the corrupt that fill our houses of government now. I can not advise you who to vote for but only who to NOT vote for. If they are in office today, GET RID OF THEM. I do advise that you stop supporting either the Democratic party or the Republican party. There is not one that is less evil than the other.
" I just keep getting the feeling that all the "hangin' " on.... to the system... is adding to the problem....."
Please note that you said this, not I.
I agree with you, it is very difficult. But if we all hang on to the system, nothing will change. Thing is, doing even small things does help. Don't let them dissuade you. Do what you can. After that, do a little more. Keep stretching yourself and pushing your own envelope. Doing what you feel is right, is right. And it will strengthen your resolve.
Politics is off the radar for me now. It is too late. And with what we have left for a political system, the less that comes from it, the better. The less energy we give them, the more we can give to ourselves and our communities. Read some of the great masters: Buddha, Jesus, Mohammed, Lao-Tsu - they all say the same thing - if we don't get ourselves right, we can't get anything right. Don't do it in isolation - build a community of people who strongly want to start living their lives in concert with their values. It's a radical approach, therefore, it scares some people. It upsets their apple cart. But it really is the only way out and forward.
Love your kids. Love your husband. Live your life the way you really believe it should be lived. Do it for them and all of us. It really is the only way. Always has been.
Yes, we all have responsibilities. But ask yourself, what are you responsible for?
We're all in this together, stuck between a rock and a hard place.
RCallaghan wrote:
Yes. From a Pesticide Action Network (PAN) online petition to Congress:
So the chemical companies designed products safer to humans that just shift their damage further down the food chain. Right to the bees, who are squarely responsible for propagating much of the food supply. Oh, the delicious irony and arrogance of it all! It's just become too sadly predictable, the logic that goes into creating these "solutions".
~ Neonicotinoids emerged in the mid-1990s as a relatively less-toxic alternative to human-damaging pesticides. They soon became wildly popular, and were the fastest-growing class of pesticides in modern history. Their effects on non-pest insects, however, were unknown. ~
~ Previous scientific work has shown insect neurotoxins may cause memory, learning, and navigation problems in bees. ~
humans are suffering these same memory/learning deficiencies, of late...
less-toxic is a tricky little hyphenated excuse for widespread use...
what are those acronyms, again? the ones that end with Ritalin?
There has been a veritable explosion (eg, in cases of autism) in recent years, which has been attributed to many different things (vaccines, better diagnosis and reporting, etc).
Unfortunately, the problem with all this stuff is that it is virtually impossible to prove a definitive link to humans (it has to be done through epidemiological studeies which are rarely definitive), which is why this research on bees is so important.
Perhaps, just perhaps, we will think twice about the further use of these pesticides if they know they may be having a direct and significant impact on our food supply -- and more importantly, on the bottom line: agricultural profit.
But I won't hold my breath.
As a species we are far better at rationalizing away obvious problems (pesticide poisoning, climate change, etc) than we are at reasoning.
And due to the little quirk called "natural selection", the members of the human species who are "smartest" (as in cleverest) are simply using it for their own advantage (to make money and maintain their position at the "top" of our political and economic pyramid), at the expense of the rest of us, who are either too stupid to recognize the problem or to do anything about it even when we recognize it.
That's the U.S.A for ya: too little, too late, and always because of short-term profit.
That pisses me off, and I'll suggest Goulson is a narcissistic media whore. Previous studies over the past 10 years have been *profoundly* damning of neonicotinoids, but these studies have been ignored by industry and governments worldwide, EXCEPT by the thoughtful German Government who have banned neonicotinoids. The Germans are sufficiently financially and politically strong to ignore pressure from the US State Dept to do progressive and meaningful stuff like end nuclear power generation and ban neonicotinoids. If you ask why DoS is involved; the US manufactures over 90% of the world's neonicotinoids base. Facism as it's finest.
Having damned Goulson, I do applaud their research and hope that his desire for the media spotlight can be put to good use.