EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
New Study Finds Skyrocketing Increase in Autism
Group says link to environmental factors shown, gov't should regulate toxic chemicals
A just released report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that children diagnosed with Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) had a skyrocketing increase of 78% compared to results from a decade ago. The CDC report shows that one in 88 children are now diagnosed with the disorder.
Environmental Working Group (EWG) notes that "a burgeoning body of independent scientific research suggests that one factor that may be in play is environmental exposure to neurotoxic chemicals, most notably mercury," and sees the staggering figures as a call for governmental action to minimize children's exposure to toxic chemicals, especially coal plant caused mercury exposure. “Upending the federal government’s approach to regulating toxic chemicals and putting tough emissions standards in place at power plants are two good places to start,” said Environmental Working Group President Ken Cook.
(photo: hepingting)
The CDC conclusion that "ASDs continue to be an important public health concern" would be a challenge under the House Republican budget which would "cut federal spending on Medicaid — the single largest funding source of funding for autism support — by more than $800 billion below current projections over the next 10 years."
A 2011 Stanford University School of Medicine study found that 62 percent of autism risk was attributable to environmental factors.
* * *
From the CDC report: Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network Surveillance Year 2008 Principal Investigators
Results: For 2008, the overall estimated prevalence of ASDs among the 14 ADDM sites was 11.3 per 1,000 (one in 88) children aged 8 years who were living in these communities during 2008. Overall ASD prevalence estimates varied widely across all sites (range: 4.8–21.2 per 1,000 children aged 8 years). ASD prevalence estimates also varied widely by sex and by racial/ethnic group. Approximately one in 54 boys and one in 252 girls living in the ADDM Network communities were identified as having ASDs. Comparison of 2008 findings with those for earlier surveillance years indicated an increase in estimated ASD prevalence of 23% when the 2008 data were compared with the data for 2006 (from 9.0 per 1,000 children aged 8 years in 2006 to 11.0 in 2008 for the 11 sites that provided data for both surveillance years) and an estimated increase of 78% when the 2008 data were compared with the data for 2002 (from 6.4 per 1,000 children aged 8 years in 2002 to 11.4 in 2008 for the 13 sites that provided data for both surveillance years). Because the ADDM Network sites do not make up a nationally representative sample, these combined prevalence estimates should not be generalized to the United States as a whole.
Interpretation: These data confirm that the estimated prevalence of ASDs identified in the ADDM network surveillance populations continues to increase. The extent to which these increases reflect better case ascertainment as a result of increases in awareness and access to services or true increases in prevalence of ASD symptoms is not known. ASDs continue to be an important public health concern in the United States, underscoring the need for continued resources to identify potential risk factors and to provide essential supports for persons with ASDs and their families.
* * *
Environmental Working Group (EWG): Autism Rate Surges Among US Children
“These stunning new figures are a call to action among our elected leaders to minimize our children’s exposures to mercury and other toxic chemicals,” said EWG President Ken Cook. “These stunning new figures are a call to action among our elected leaders to minimize our children’s exposures to mercury and other toxic chemicals,” said Environmental Working Group President Ken Cook. “Nothing less than an all-hands-on-deck approach to this mounting epidemic is required by Congress, the President and industry.”
Though the cause of autism is yet not known, a burgeoning body of independent scientific research suggests that one factor that may be in play is environmental exposure to neurotoxic chemicals, most notably mercury, a common toxic byproduct at coal-fired power plants around the country.
“Upending the federal government’s approach to regulating toxic chemicals and putting tough emissions standards in place at power plants are two good places to start,” said Cook. The federal Toxic Substances Control Act has allowed the chemical industry to flood the marketplace with toxic chemicals, including neurotoxins, with virtually no proof they are safe for people.
* * *
The Hill: Federal government estimates 1 in 88 children in the US has autism
"The data signal an impending crisis in America's safety net system for people with autism and related disorders."The report comes just as House Republicans prepare to approve a budget that would cut federal spending on Medicaid — the single largest funding source of funding for autism support — by more than $800 billion below current projections over the next 10 years. [...]
The Arc, an advocacy group for people with disabilities, warned against proposed cuts to federal healthcare spending.
"The data signal an impending crisis in America's safety net system for people with autism and related disorders," The Arc CEO Peter Berns said in a statement. "We may be facing a ‘perfect storm’ as the rapid rise in the prevalence of autism comes at the very same time Congress is proposing to cut hundreds of billions of dollars from the Medicaid program — the single largest funding source of services and support for autism — while slashing funding for public health programs."
* * *
From July 2011: Stanford University School of Medicine: Non-genetic factors play surprisingly large role in determining autism, says study by group
2011 study found that genes account for 38 percent of autism risk, with environmental factors explaining the remaining 62 percent.A new Stanford University School of Medicine study of twins suggests that non-genetic factors play an unexpectedly large role in determining autism risk, turning upside down recent assumptions about the cause of this common, disabling developmental disorder.
From prior studies of shared autism in twins, scientists had estimated that 90 percent of autism risk was attributable to genes and only 10 percent to non-genetic environmental factors. But the new study — the largest ever of twins in which at least one in each pair has autism — shows almost the opposite: It found that genes account for 38 percent of autism risk, with environmental factors explaining the remaining 62 percent. [...]
The finding that autism risk is strongly influenced by environmental factors should alert scientists to the need to study risk factors they haven't been considering, the researchers said. [...]
And what might the unknown environmental risk factors be?
"That's the multimillion dollar question," Hallmayer said. "I think a lot about it." Autism's manifestation in very young children points to something that happens in early life, potentially even during pregnancy, he said.
"Our findings suggest that events during pregnancy should be a focus for future research into the origins of autism," said Lisa Croen, PhD, a co-author on the study. Croen is a senior research scientist and director of the Autism Research Program at the Kaiser Permanente Division of Research.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

132 Comments so far
Show AllIf you would like to have 'our' government pay any heed to what we the people want, you had better not vote for any Democrat or any Republican. Only way we can get a glimpse of democracy in this land is to toss out the scum in Congress. Those are the people who say we are bombing Iraq and Afghanistan to bring them democracy---as if we had any to give away.
Not that I doubt your sincerity, but if I was posting on CD for the Heritage Foundation, that's exactly what I would say.
Yes, we can see what the lead did to your ability to reason.
Something to think about while you still can. How 'bout a nice juicy rare hamburg, Bwa-ha-ha-haaaa...
There is really only a single civilizational paradigm, which began with the beginnings of sedentary, extractive agriculture and led inexorably to dramatic increases in both human population and human misery as well as environmental devastation and a constant need for territorial expansion.
This was the foundation for all proto-modern economic systems: capitalism, socialism, communism, fascism. They all share the same ethic of technological "progress".
Daniel Quinn, perhaps, said it best: we are either takers or leavers.
As usual you are making big pronouncements, but it lacks verisimilitude.
As usual, introducing nit pickery and diversion.
Slowly this attitude of humans outside the world grew until it became the almost universal paradigm. It controls they attitudes of all governments today.
In 1859, the American Dental Association (ADA) was founded by delegates representing various dental societies in the United States. The ADA did not forbid use of amalgams, and the ADA position on the safety of mercury amalgam has remained consistent since its foundation, in spite of published scientific studies to the contrary since 1882. Dentists advocate the use of mercury amalgam because it is durable, cheap, and easy to use.
Disposal of mercury by dentists goes largely unregulated in the United States. The World Health Organization reports that mercury from amalgam and laboratory devices accounts for 53% of total mercury emissions to the environment.
From the actual WHO report. Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 50 ELEMENTAL MERCURY AND INORGANIC MERCURY COMPOUNDS: HUMAN HEALTH ASPECTS From page seven:
Exposure to elemental mercury by the general population and in occupational settings is primarily through inhaling mercury vapours/fumes. The average level of atmospheric mercury is now approximately 3– 6 times higher than the level estimated for preindustrial ambient air. Dental amalgam constitutes a potentially significant source of exposure to elemental mercury, with estimates of daily intake from amalgam restorations ranging from 1 to 27 µg/day, the majority of dental amalgam holders being exposed to less than 5 µg mercury/day.
The report makes no such claim about dental industry being the source of "53% percent" of the total emissions to the environment. This is a blatant lie.
It mentions what I have listed above- it is a source of exposure for people who have the fillings, not the dental and medical industry being the source of environmental dispersal.
You Robert Riversong-or whatever your real name is- are disgusting. It is the burning of coal that is spreading the mercury to everyone, not dentistry. Now are you trying to get us to hate dentistry, or protecting your income from the oligarchs who extract wealth from poisoning us all?
It's on page one of the WHO report. Your inability to do basic research or to comprehend the simplest of facts constitutes a "lie" on my part. Fascinating.
When I paddled the sub-arctic wilderness of central Labrador in the early 80s, scientists were finding acidification of the environment there from coal-burning plants in the American Midwest.
You recognized one of the essential dilemmas that scientists have had in trying to sort our genes v. nature.
The study of heritability faces this essential problem in all contexts. For example, when studying the genes for alcoholism, many alcoholics grow up in alcoholic families. Or shy people grow up with shy parents, etc.
Scientists try to study identical twins separated at birth, but despite the problem of the shortage of such individuals, the have the additional problem that studies have shown that they tend to wind up in similar environments (white middle class kids tend to get adopted by the same, etc.)
Geneticists have found that you cannot study genes outside of the environment. Many genes express themselves one way in a certain environment and not at all in another. The question isn't nature or nurture, but nature and nurture.
But I find fascinating that we have learned that we can improve IQ with training. Every decade we have to re-score the IQ tests because kids have improved by about 3% every 10 years for the last 100 years (yes, a 30 point increase). And almost 100% of that increase has come in the lower classes.
In other words, improvement in children's environment can greatly increase their collective IQ over time. So when the rich denigrate the poor as stupid, we now know that oppression caused their lesser status, not innate ability.
The new field of epigenetics informs us that DNA is merely the blueprint. Nature (the environment) is the architect, and determines when and whether and how the genetic code gets expressed.
Try telling that to the gene nazis, such as the believers in the cult of evolutionary psychology.
In this one case, widely divergent concentrations of p,p'-DDE (a DDT breakdown product) were found (0.12 vs. 0.38 ng/ml), evidence that twins can have unique exposure histories. Since twins do not share the same amniotic fluid, and because this evidence shows it is possible for the exposures to be significantly different, it cannot be assumed that twins share the same in utero environment.
This might actually explain some of the differences that are observed of identical twins.
Why would increased exposure to mercury cause an increase in diagnosed cases of autism among boys more than girls? Wouldn't an environmental assault affect both sexes equally? After all, the metabolism of boys and girls do not differ significantly.
Is there a monetary reason more cases of autism are being diagnosed? Do parents of autistic kids receive benefits that translate into more help at school, free childcare, tax benefits of various kinds? I suspect so. Still, I await research that can tease out these various factors.
The article notes this difficulty, but the reversal in findings of relative contribution of environmental factors for autism among twins does suggest that non-genetic factors have increased dramatically.
"Why would increased exposure to mercury cause an increase in diagnosed cases of autism among boys more than girls?"
If the principle factor is environmental mercury from power plants, and if boys play more often outdoors and in the dirt than do girls - that could be the most obvious explanation.