Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Earth Sends Climate Warning by Busting World Heat Records
First decade of 21st Century warmest on record; US locations break 7,000 temperature records in March
Accelarated climate change, driven by human activity, has led to soaring temperatures around the world and the decade between 2001 and 2010 was the warmest ever recorded in all continents of the globe, according to a new report released by the World Meteorological Organization.
Additionally, an 'unprecedented' heatwave in the United States "has set or tied more than 7,000 high temperature records" across the country, according to a report from Climate Central. "This heat wave is essentially unprecedented," said the media and research orgnanization's Heidi Cullen told Reuters. "It's hard to grasp how massive and significant this is."
The increase in global temperatures since 1971 has been “remarkable” according to the WHO's assessment. Atmospheric and oceanic phenomena such as La Niña events had a temporary cooling influence in some years, the report says, but did not halt the overriding warming trend.
The “dramatic and continuing sea ice decline in the Arctic” was one of the most prominent features of the changing state of the climate during the decade, according to the preliminary findings. Global average precipitation was the second highest since 1901 and flooding was reported as the most frequent extreme event, it said.
“This 2011 annual assessment confirms the findings of the previous WMO annual statements that climate change is happening now and is not some distant future threat. The world is warming because of human activities and this is resulting in far-reaching and potentially irreversible impacts on our Earth, atmosphere and oceans,” said WMO Secretary-General Michel Jarraud. "The world is warming because of human activities and this is resulting in far-reaching and potentially irreversible impacts on our Earth, atmosphere and oceans," he added.
* * *
Reuters: US Heat 'Unprecedented,' 7,000 Records Set or Tied
An "unprecedented" March heat wave in much of the continental United States has set or tied more than 7,000 high temperature records, and signals a warming climate, health and weather experts said on Friday.
While natural climate variability plays a major role, it is the addition of human-spurred climate change that makes this particular hot spell extraordinary, the scientists said in a telephone and web briefing. [...]
Since March 12, more than 7,000 high temperature records have been equaled or exceeded, Cullen said, citing figures from the U.S. National Climatic Data Center.
These records include daytime high temperatures and record-high low temperatures overnight, which in some cases are higher than previous record highs for the day, Cullen said.
"When low temperatures are breaking previous record highs, that's when you see this is incredibly special," she said.
* * *
From Climate Central: State-by-State Look at How Early Spring Has Arrived:
Click for access to interactive map at Climate Central.
For most of the country spring has sprung earlier this year, but is this anything more than a single warm year? It seems that it is. During the past several decades, with the exception of the Southeast, spring weather has, indeed, been arriving earlier.
In the interactive above, you can see how much earlier spring has arrived state-by-state, measured by the date of "first leaf." As you hover over any state, it'll display two boxes: a gray box that represents the day spring used to arrive (based on the 1951-1980 average) and a colored box that represents how much earlier spring has arrived in recent years (based on the 1981-2010 average).
Nationwide, the date of “first leaf” has clearly shifted — arriving roughly three days earlier now on March 17th (1981-2010 average) from March 20th (1951-1980 average). This shift affects all sorts of biological processes that are triggered by warmer temperatures — not just flowering, but animal migration and giving birth and the shedding of winter coats and the emergence from cocoons. How much will an earlier spring disrupt the intricate natural balance between the tens of thousands of species that depend on each other for food, reproduction and ultimately, survival? No one really knows.
* * *
AFP adds:
"Most likely the weird weather arises from natural variation on top of a warming climate," said Michael Oppenheimer, a geoscientist at Princeton and a veteran participant in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. "What we're seeing now is not surprising in the greenhouse world ... It's just the beginning of our experience with the new atmosphere."
Oppenheimer was a lead author of the panel's path-breaking 2007 report that analyzed research by hundreds of scientists and found there was a 90 percent probability that climate change is occurring and human activities contribute to it.
That report projected an increase in heat waves, droughts, floods, severe storms and extreme temperatures as a result of human-spurred global warming, caused in part by rising emissions of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide emitted by fossil fuel burning.
* * *
The WMO report looks at the increased prevalence of extreme weather events around the world:
Numerous weather and climate extremes affected almost every part of the globe with flooding, droughts, cyclones, heat waves, and cold waves. Two exceptional heat waves hit Europe and Russia during summer 2003 and 2010 respectively with disastrous impacts and thousands of deaths and outbreaks of prolonged bush fires.
Flooding was the most reported extreme event during the decade with many parts of the world affected. Historical widespread and prolonged flooding affected Eastern Europe in 2001 and 2005, Africa in 2008, Asia (in particular Pakistan) in 2010 and India in 2005, and Australia in 2010.
A large number of countries reported extreme drought conditions, including Australia, eastern Africa, the Amazonia region and the western United States. Humanitarian consequences were significant in eastern Africa during the first half of the decade, with widespread shortage of food and loss of lives and livestock.
Forty-eight out of 102 countries (47 per cent) reported that their highest national maximum temperature was recorded in 2001-2010, compared to 20 per cent for 1991-2000 and around 10 per cent for the earlier decades.
The decade saw the highest level of tropical cyclone activity on record for the North Atlantic basin. In 2005 category 5 hurricane Katrina was the most costly hurricane to hit the United States, with a significant human toll of more than 1 800 deaths. In 2008, tropical cyclone Nargis was the worst natural disaster in Myanmar and the world’s deadliest tropical cyclone during the decade, killing more than 70 000 people.
# # #
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

250 Comments so far
Show AllThe human being has been shown to be a force of nature, even as long ago as forty thousand years ago, when Australia was first colonized by our species:
"Our results suggest that human arrival rather than climate caused megafaunal extinction, which then triggered replacement of mixed rainforest by sclerophyll vegetation through a combination of direct effects on vegetation of relaxed herbivore pressure and increased fire in the landscape. This ecosystem shift was as large as any effect of climate change over the last glacial cycle, and indicates the magnitude of changes that may have followed megafaunal extinction elsewhere in the world."
From:
"The Aftermath of Megafaunal Extinction: Ecosystem Transformation in Pleistocene Australia"
Susan Rule et al; Science, VOL 335 23 MARCH 2012.
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/335/6075/1483.abstract
-----------------------In short, as Ronald Wright pointed out in his "A Short History of Progress", we hunted ourselves out of a job, eventually to the point of becoming stunted farmers, both physically and intellectually, sedentary, conservative, quarrelsome and then warlike - out of necessity, there being only so much to go around on a finite planet amongst a species whose population explosion is now coming to its pre-destined conclusion.
The result is as you see it today - a devastated ecosphere rapidly warming due to our activities - and incessant war, which shows absolutely no signs of abating in the foreseeable future.
Manysummits
=========Whereas many other animals and plants are very, very welcome in humanized landscapes.
We have a drive to preserve and enhance ecosystems as well as a drive to destroy or drastically alter them.
number 9, number 9, number 9, number 9...
All of his work is available, it is not suppressed, it is simply not funded. Your whole rant left out the word Capitalism- the real problem is the mechanical structure of class society brought about by Capitalism.
Your No Agenda is not really nuanced or agenda free- and Common Dreams is not some totalitarian system of control, you are totally anonymous here if you want to be.
Also, good contrast with the present rate of extinction when there IS the knowledge and the proof and the warnings that species are going extinct clearly due to human activity and when clearly shown how this rate of extinction does NOT have to be so.
I recently read a good book by a proponent of the overkill hypothesis:
As for the mammoths in North America (and South America too?) and also in Siberia, based on what I've read and heard, I think it's safe to say that hunting by humans played a very significant role in their extinction, considering that their "cousins" in the evolutionary tree still survive in other parts of the world.
Since you mention the Mediterranean, ml2, I have posted in the past about the massive deforestation along the coast and in much of western Europe, in the last 2,000 years, and in particular, in more recent times in western Europe. That was done by humans. I'm not talking about any extinction, but the enormous impact that such deforestation must have had, and continues to have to this day.
ml2 wrote:
Look up buffalo jump.
From the linked Wikipedia article:
The whole herd had to be killed. While this well-documented style of hunting did not lead to extinction in the case of buffalos, there's also evidence of mammoth jumps.
Aside from an inherently racist doctrine that indigenous people aren't like white people, there's no evidence to support the belief that no native cultures were wasteful enough to commit overkill. Some indigenous cultures, usually island people, had to survive sustainably. Tough-minded migrants could, and did, wipe out local populations of a species and move on.
On continent after continent, a cascade of megafaunal extinctions promptly followed the arrival of humans. Some studies find that ancient climate changes also played a role, but the large animals of Europe, Asia, and the Americas (which, unlike African megafauna, had not developed an appropriate wariness of humans) would not have disappeared without the influence of human predation.
There is abundant archaeological evidence of wasteful mass killings of vanished species, buffalo jump style.
Dissenters from the overkill hypothesis are obligated to present a plausible alternative hypothesis. The fossil record clearly shows a remarkable density of megafauna on every continent, with precipitous declines always following the arrival of humans. The alternative hypothesis that regional climate changes catastrophic for these large animals just happened to coincide with human migrations strikes me as extremely implausible.
I'm honestly interested in seeing how an evidence-based case is built against the the overkill hypothesis. Partial attribution of extinctions to climate changes is the strongest counter-hypothesis I've seen advanced in recent research. If you have any research to share which supports your opinion, I'd be quite interested in reading it.
But there were never as many mammoth, mastodons, giant sloths, etc as there were bison, bison being smaller. And hunters --human and non-- who didn't have the benefit of .50 cal. Sharps rifles generally had the most luck killing the very old, who probably weren't all that tasty, though that probably bothered the wolves and cats less than the humans, or the very young, who would have been the next generation except for having been killed and eaten.
Reducing the human birthrate to 0.5 child per adult will drop our world population to 500M in just 150 years, something needed rather desperately.
If we reduced our repro level to 0, we'd effectively go extinct in 50 years.
Which means that it would have taken humans much less than 1K years to make megafauna species go extinct by killing and eating their children to fuel the continued increase in our own population.
Since information traveled by word of mouth in prehistory, people wouldn't have realised what they were doing til they'd already done it. Which is what happened to the aurochs in Europe -- nobody but a few naturalists realised that the genocide was underway until the last aurochs died in 1627 and it was complete.
(The European bison was also being hunted to extinction, but breeding groups managed to survive in the trackless, primeval Białowieska forest until humans began to come to their senses about extinctions in the 20th c.
During WW2, the Polish underground might have learned from the bison, because they, too, set up their living space in the forests, and thereby escaped extinction by the Wehrmacht)
Certainly many ecosystems and many of the creatures, plants and other biota in them, are now interwoven with humans.
Your premise that humans are looking out for humans, while other species are not looking out for what is best for them is not supported by any evidence.
Your premise that there exists some mythical proper and good way that the earth should be, and that excluding humans would allow that to exist, is also not supported by any evidence.
But perhaps you belong to a species within the rodentia order. In that case, it is not entirely illogical and foolish that you would call for the elimination of humans. I would point out, however, that many rodentia species have benefited from the activities of humans.
A serious solution to the problem of humans burning their house down could never be to eliminate the humans. Putting out the fires and stopping the arsonists is the better solution. Of course we can eliminate the problems that humans face by eliminating humans. That is not really saying anything.
We certainly want to have a planet of biological diversity. However, the issue of immediate importance is survival of the humanity.
All life on earth is doomed in another 600 to 800 million years anyway due to increased solar output and the long term trend toward biospheric carbon-starvation (the opposite of our current short-term problem) caused by silicate weathering and carbonate rock formation. The higher solar output acclerates this process as Lovelocks "Gaia" struggles to compensate - ultimately futilely - as some atmospheric CO2 is necessary for life. Ultimately, it will be only some kind of human-like intelligent creature putting up an orbiting solar shade system that will prolong life on earth in those distant future times.
bravo, rodent!
Was Buddha -- who saw all his former lifetimes passing through the levels of animals (and maybe some plants as well, unrecorded by his disciples) -- was Buddha "in full contempt" when he preached compassion for all living things?
http://www.elnino.noaa.gov/ Has anyone seen any predictions for hurricanes for this year?
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/
whocares;)
These "cold winters" didn't begin to approach the winters of 1977-78 when I saw an an 80 foot free-fall waterfall on a large creek in Southwest Virginia frozen solid or the winter of 1917 to1918 - when photos were taken of the US-side of Niagara Falls frozen bottom-to top.
That does make the warming look a bit more dramatic than it has been -at least compared to a rise from the geologically recent equalibrium.
And it would also be nice if speculations that species will die-out because of spring arriving three days earlier than 30 years ago were kept out altogether or at least subjected to a little bit of calm reason.
But, those are just quibbles.
It looks like we may really see major effects from the changing climate in our lifetimes.
Sorta exciting really.
Resilience and Sustainability and Mitigation and Management need to be our guiding words now.
And when the Fear-mongers begin to work on us, we just need to think of how nice the Semi Tropical Great Lakes will be. ;)
What is serious is the dour, anti-human, "Oh my God, we're all gonna die!", "We suck so bad we deserve to all die", response that all too many people -especially and most weirdly on the supposedly liberated left- have to this situation that is way beyond our control.
So, you can be sad or fearful or whatever if you want, but the Great Lakes area really may be sub- or semi-tropical in a few centuries, and if that does happen it will be good.
Here, I'll do a sad face for you: ;(