Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Obama Set to Speed Up Approval of Tar Sands Pipeline
Cushing, Oklahoma, to Port Arthur, Texas, section likely to be quickly approved
Although President Obama denied a permit for the main Keystone XL pipeline from Canada's tar sands to the Gulf of Mexico in January, it is expected that he will announce on Thursday on a visit to Cushing, Oklahoma, a plan to speed up the permit for the southern section of the Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry tar sands crude from Cushing to Port Arthur, Texas.
Although "the most critical part of the pipeline still can't be built," Bill McKibben writes, "the sense grows that Obama may be setting us up for a bitter disappointment -- that his real allegiance is to the carbon barons." (photo: Christine Irvine / Tar Sands Action) Noah Greenwald of the Center for Biological Diversity said today, “Keystone XL may be a boon to Big Oil companies in the exporting business but those profits will come at a stiff price for our land, water, wildlife and climate.” “Building Keystone XL in pieces doesn’t make it any less dangerous.”
* * *
CNN: Obama to fast track southern half of Keystone XL Pipeline
President Barack Obama plans to announce in Cushing, Oklahoma Thursday that his administration will expedite the permit for the southern half of the Keystone XL pipeline, a source familiar with the president's announcement tells CNN.
* * *
The Texas Tribune: Obama to talk about Keystone XL pipeline in Oklahoma this week
A White House official confirmed Tuesday that the president on Thursday will "reiterate his administration's commitment to expediting the construction of a pipeline from Cushing, Okla., to the Gulf of Mexico, relieving a bottleneck of oil and bringing domestic resources to market."
* * *
Suzanne Goldenberg, The Guardian/UK:
On two-day energy tour, US president is expected to hasten building of southern section of tar sands line out of Canada
Barack Obama is expected to speed up approval of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline on Thursday after taking to the road with what the White House is billing as an "all of the above" energy tour.
Obama's planned visit to the oil hub of Cushing, Oklahoma, on day two of the energy tour has raised expectations he will speed up approval of the southern US-only segment of the pipeline, running from the town to Port Arthur, Texas.
The approval, which would infuriate environmental groups, could allow construction on that portion to begin before November's presidential elections instead of next year.
Obama's tour starts with a visit to the country's biggest operating solar farm in Boulder City, Nevada. The White House said in a statement: "The president will highlight his administration's focus on diversifying our energy portfolio, including expanding renewable energy from sources like wind and solar, which thanks in part to investments made by this administration is set to double in the president's first term."
But the visit seemed a detour on a trip apparently solidly focused on fossil fuels and the price of gas at the pump.
Obama has been under nonstop attack from Republicans for rising petrol prices, which now stand at well over $4 (£2.50) for a US gallon in some parts of the country, and for his decision in January to halt the pipeline because of a section running through an ecologically sensitive part of Nebraska.
On the campaign trail, Newt Gingrich has said he would cut gas prices to $2.50 if he is elected president, and Mitt Romney has taken to demanding Obama sack his energy secretary, Steven Chu, the interior secretary, Ken Salazar, and his Environmental Protection Agency administrator, Lisa Jackson. Gingrich calls the three the "gas hike trio".
But Obama's forthcoming speech at a pipe yard owned by TransCanada, the Canadian company behind the project to pump crude from the tar sands of Alberta, was seen as a strong signal that the pipeline – at least, the portion running from Cushing to Port Arthur, Texas – is back on track.
The White House said last month it would allow the southern portion, which requires no State Department approval, to go ahead. It was not immediately clear how Obama would push the process along further.
TransCanada has said it will go ahead with the Cushing-Port Arthur segment of the pipeline as soon it gets the go-ahead from the army corps of engineers.
The White House said in a statement Obama's visiting Cushing was intended to show his commitment to "improving and supporting the infrastructure that helps us leverage our domestic resources, while also ensuring these projects are developed in a safe and responsible way".
It continued: "This includes a pipeline that will transport oil from Cushing to the Gulf of Mexico, which will help address the bottleneck of oil that has resulted in large part from increased domestic oil production in the midwest."
Fast-tracking a portion of the pipeline would be a huge disappointment for a broad coalition of activists who have campaigned against the project, framing it as a test of Obama's green credentials.
* * *
Bill McKibben: Mr. Obama Goes to Cushing, OK
Amidst the many environmental disappointments of the Obama administration -- the fizzled Copenhagen conference, the opening of vast swathes of the Arctic to drilling and huge stretches of federal land across the northern Plains to coal-mining, the failure to work for climate legislation in the Senate, the shameful blocking of regulations to control ozone -- the president has done one somewhat brave thing. He responded to the largest outpouring of environmental enthusiasm so far this millennium and denied a permit for the main Keystone XL pipe from Canada's tar sands to the Gulf of Mexico.
Cynics said he did so just to avoid disappointing young people before the election, and pointed out that he invited pipeline proponent Transcanada to reapply for the permit. It's hard not to wonder if those cynics might be right, now that he's going to Oklahoma to laud the southern half of the project just as Transcanada executives have requested.
True, the most critical part of the pipeline still can't be built -- thanks to Obama and 42 Democratic Senators, the connection to Canada remains blocked, and hence that remains a great victory for the people who rallied so fiercely all fall. But the sense grows that Obama may be setting us up for a bitter disappointment -- that his real allegiance is to the carbon barons.
* * *
Center for Biological Diversity: Obama Trumpets Dirty Fuel Pipeline That Will Allow Global Export of Tar Sands Oil, Worsen Climate Crisis
“The Gulf Coast leg would add to the fossil fuel infrastructure at a time when we critically need to transition away from fossil fuels in order to avoid climate catastrophe,” said Noah Greenwald of the Center for Biological Diversity. “Just like Keystone I, the Gulf Coast leg of Keystone XL will spill, polluting land and water and ruining important habitat for endangered species like the whooping crane, piping plover, American burying beetle, interior least tern, and Arkansas River shiner.”
“The president’s support for this pipeline is troubling,” said Greenwald. “Keystone XL may be a boon to Big Oil companies in the exporting business but those profits will come at a stiff price for our land, water, wildlife and climate.”
“The American people have spoken clearly against this project,” said Greenwald. “Building Keystone XL in pieces doesn’t make it any less dangerous.”
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

115 Comments so far
Show AllI wonder which editors of the Harvard Law Review have not been either 1% by birth or those bright boys and girls intent on entering the1% by rendering important service to the uber-class, ie lawn jockeys
? Was Nader law review?Obama made it to the big time due to longtime Kompany service by his mother and her father, Both of Obama's fathers were also Kompany recruits but I don't know if the dadas really rang up the Kompany Klout to really help the aspiring power tripping Obama.
But I think the verdict is in. Obama is a Kompany Kreation, the bankster wing. In reality,a great deal of liberalism is Kompany sponsored, but hidden. The Kontrol of the Konservative side is more blatantly militaristic - google Gen Odom for a Tea Party example.
I can't really make out Dr Paul's Konnections, if any, But then Kompany penetration of the extreme right is extensive,
"4thefuture"
Yes, this report itself is pathetic in its denial of reality.
In the first sentence of this report wherein Common Dreams cites itself in its celebration of a falsehood, they AGAIN use false words to describe what Obama has been doing.
The administration did NOT "reject", as was previously stated, and they did NOT "deny" a permit, as is the new delusion.
The Obama administration deviously chose to NOT DECIDE for or against the permit. THAT is all. Electioneering, nothing more.
Now, when it is becoming glaringly obvious to anyone with a brain what this corrupt corporate administration is up to, Common Dreams and the rest of the delusional Obama lovers STILL try to cling to their delusions.
I wish this website could commit wholeheartedly to what they could be instead of repeatedly falling back into democrat PR.
PLEASE.
Third party, "Bill". Build the movement. And you don't need to "dress to impress" to be a lickspittle for Washington!
"theinitiate"
Have you tried to help the Green Party?
The lovers of the status quo will try to keep you from going Green by saying the Green Party doesn't stand a chance and as long as people continue to listen to that self-fulfilling prophesy it will be true.
At this point, the Greens are the only party with a clearly beneficial agenda.
Corporate control is behind the democrats, the republicans, and the libertarians.
I wonder what the two Obama mini me's will tell their children when they ask why their grandpa did nothing to save the planet for them? Maybe they'll just tell them without grandpa making all that money, they would not have such a pretty underground bunker to live out their days in...
I believe most people take the position that change cannot be affected from the inside. No one I can think of has been successful in changing Washington but Washington has been very successful in changing people.
Many idealistic people have sat at the table you refer to but were frustrated by the will of the status quo. I now believe that change can only come from the outside. The people sitting at the table are not representiing the interests of the people.
I understand what you are saying in your comment and if we had system that was responsive to the will of the people then your position would be valid. We do not have that system. We the people are not the government. We are not citizens of a sovereign of state. We are merely subjects to a corporate state.
Take of yourself,
Thomas Gilbert-
"Let us demonize everyone and everything that opposes our view and claim whatever we need to in support of our claims, true or not. That has really worked well."
You are fooling very few people here.
Harry Reid, is a right winger, as are all of those in the Democratic Party that comprise the current power center, or leadership, of that party, with Obama being the Consummate Con Man who is far to the right of Ronald Reagan.
In short, Harry Reid, most of the Democratic Party at this point, Obama, and the Republicans are ON THE SAME TEAM!!!!!
Is it that difficult to comprehend?
"Memory_Hole"
I suspect that Obama's behavior is directly related to the number of delegates he has accrued in the primaries. The democrats are gliding along, giving him delegates without hesitation, and now he is feeling safely beyond any challenge. So, Obama not only has the stupid democrats in line, but he can try to lure some of the stupid republicans over to help elect him by proving his devotion to corporatism.
As the election of 2008 approached, Obama was CONfident enough to blatantly display his disdain for the Bill of Rights and show himself to be a tool of Wall Street. He knew it would please his employers in 2008 to show how easy it was to belittle the majority of his supporters and he is just as CONfident now.
His nomination is a done deal and, with the help of the republican candidates, so is his election.
I did not (in 2008) and I will not now underestimate his shrewd deviousness.
All of the people who try to portray him as "disappointing" or "clumsy" or in any other way as hapless, are underestimating his (and his two parties) predatory natures.
Why would Obama approve the lower half of the pipeline if he wasn't going to approve the northern half?
He wouldn't!
So a question to Obama supporters?
WILL this upcoming betrayal and subsequent approval cause you to change your mind on Obama?
I doubt it -
Double down your support on your failed leader the Oilybomber as he helps drive the last few nails into the American middle class and the working poor.
The unglamorous and work intensive effort to educate people, to organize people for petitions, demonstrations, arrests, to develop local groups, is a huge part of the story, and that groundwork has had a good start. 350.org has proven to be a trustworthy organizer of events, which is important since people do not usually care to take big risks and then be stranded by an incompetent or impulsive organizing group.
Now I believe that if the southern pipeline is approved, direct action should be considered. But the key is to have sufficient numbers and good timing or else it is just more work for the Lawyers' Guild. Sister Rose Berger of Sojourners has pledged that if the Keystone XL pipeline (northern section) were approved, clergy would lie down in front of bulldozers. I am waiting to see what response comes from her, 350.org and other organizations if, after all other means are proven futile, the southern section of the pipeline is approved.
And notice his bullshit reason - to decrease the price of fuel!
Even though it's been shown - and admitted to by the pipeline profiteers it will actually Raise the price of gasoline.
Protesting it after it's built - the Perfect democratic strategy!
jclientelle
See my comment @ 4:55pm and follow the links.
Actually, one of the best sources is the TransCanada website:
"Keystone Pipeline Project" http://www.transcanada.com/keystone.html
"Project Information" http://www.transcanada.com/project_information.html
"Status and Timelines" http://www.transcanada.com/5738.html
"Maps" http://www.transcanada.com/5730.html
As you can see from the jpg images map, the plan which TransCanada and Nebraska officials are developing to alter the route to bypass the Sandhills area that sits atop the Ogallala Aquifer, is not going to be terribly difficult to complete. The plan is being finalized and TransCanada will submit a new application for approval to Obama and the State Department in the near future.
Once the Ogallala Aquifer issue has been "resolved" and removed from further discussion -- the only issue the White House has cited as a cause for concern -- Obama is expected to approve that final phase of the project.
Done Deal!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
jclientelle
D’oh! -- "As the Lorax says"?!
The Lorax was the fictional creation of Theodor Seuss Geisel, who authored children’s books under the pen name of Dr. Seuss. If you want to believe that the Lorax imparts words of great wisdom, then be my guest.
I prefer the savvy of the Cheshire Cat and the genius of Daffy Duck.
You can continue to hold on to your fantasy that the U.S./Canada portion of the Keystone XL pipeline is not a done deal despite the ample evidence that I have provided from reports from the CBC and Vancouver Sun and the TransCanada website, in which they all agree that the project is moving forward and that approval is expected in the near future.
When TransCanada's new application is finalized and submitted and approved and announced by Obama and Hillary Clinton at the State Department, then I will be the first to say: "I told you so."
You say that you disagree and suggest that the Northern portion of the pipeline is not a done deal, but you have offered zero evidence to support that notion.
Simply being a "care" bear -- someone who "cares a whole awful lot" -- will have absolutely no effect whatsoever on Obama's decision to approve the Northern phase of the Keystone XL pipeline. If being a "care" bear was an effective strategy for influencing Obama and the Democrats, we would have a single-payer health care law now, or, at the very least, a "reform" legislation with a robust Public Option and the Dorgan Amendment.
If Obama really wanted to halt the U.S./Canada portion of the Keystone XL pipeline to preserve the environment, all he ever had to do was just say "No." Full stop. End of story.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
jclientelle
What would Daffy do?
Well, since Daffy is, after all, a fictional cartoon character, you will need to use your fertile imagination to answer that question.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Our question is - what will be effective to stop the development of tar sands. and how to go about it? Wishing will not do it either. It takes work and sobriety, as well as passion.