EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- 'Beyond Orwellian': Outrage Follows Revelations of Vast Domestic Spying Program
- The Bill of Rights Exists: An Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein
- Major Loss to Organic Farmers as Court Rules in Favor of Monsanto
- Naomi Klein: 'Anti-Shock Doctrines' Show the Way to Resist
- NSA Whistleblower Revealed: Q&A with Edward Snowden
Popular content
Today's Top News
Germany Embarks on Historic Alternative Energy Push
As it phases out nuclear power in wake of public outcry, Germany to make largest investment since World War II
Spurred by a public outcry following the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan, Germany's Prime Minister, Angela Merkel, announced last year that Germany would phase out all of its nuclear power plants. Now, with a looming 20% energy gap to fill, the European nation plans to follow on its early leadership in the green energy sector with an unprecedented investment in alternative and renewable sources, including wind and solar.
Germany's plan is seen by some as an economic gamble, but many traditional energy companies -- including nuclear power companies -- are now lining up to invest in the strategic plan. One financial and energy analyst observed the plan would would make Germany's energy market, the most important in Europe, "into a massive energy laboratory."(Photographer: Ken James/Bloomberg) The program will cost 200 billion euros ($263 billion), about 8 percent of the country’s gross domestic product in 2011, according to the DIW economic institute in Berlin. And Bloomberg News reports that, "Not since the allies leveled Germany in World War II has Europe’s biggest economy undertaken a reconstruction of its energy market on this scale."
Germany's plan is seen by some as an economic gamble, but many traditional energy companies -- including nuclear power companies -- are now lining up to invest in the strategic plan. One financial and energy analyst observed the plan would would make Germany's energy market, the most important in Europe, "into a massive energy laboratory."
And though Germany's plan to phase-out of nuclear energy assumes some reliance on natural gas, the plan is a firm commitment to reach an energy economy fueled 80% by renewables, or higher.
* * *
Bloomberg: Germany’s $263 Billion Renewables Shift Biggest Since War
Chancellor Angela Merkel is planning to build offshore wind farms that will cover an area six times the size of New York City and erect power lines that could stretch from London to Baghdad. The program will cost 200 billion euros ($263 billion), about 8 percent of the country’s gross domestic product in 2011, according to the DIW economic institute in Berlin.
Germany aims to replace 17 nuclear reactors that supplied about a fifth of its electricity with renewables such as solar and wind. Merkel to succeed must experiment with untested systems and policies and overcome technical hurdles threatening the project, said Stephan Reimelt, chief executive officer of General Electric Co. (GE)’s energy unit in the country. [...]
“The German energy transformation is as challenging as the first moon landing,” said Peter Terium, who in July takes over as chief executive officer of RWE, Germany’s second-largest utility. “It’s a huge challenge we’ll be able to master only if everyone works together.”
Germany is among the first nations to grapple with a global need to upgrade power stations. By 2035, at least $10 trillion of investment is needed to add 5,900 gigawatts of generation worldwide, more than five times the capacity of all U.S. utilities, the International Energy Agency estimates. Half of that will come from renewable. A gigawatt is about enough to supply 800,000 homes in the U.S. and a bit less than the capacity of a nuclear reactor.
* * *
Oil & Energy Investor with Kent Moors, PhD.: The German Renewable Revolution
Germany has become the first nation to really tackle the rising energy crisis. To succeed, the country will require new technologies and fresh approaches, some not even yet on the drawing board.
The most important European market will transform into a massive energy laboratory. But success is hardly certain.
Either way, all eyes will focus on this huge German experiment.
It will cost German consumers even more than they pay now – some analysts say as much as 60% more. It holds captive the survival of a government, political careers, industrial prospects, and continental-wide financial policy.
As the euro zone wrestles with debt contagion and questions the strength of cross-border banking, the main lynchpin of that zone – Germany – is embarking on a very ambitious and risky path.
For those accustomed to seeing renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, geothermal, and even biofuels dependent upon heavy government subsidies, the German experiment will be a significant change.
The large public sector injections of tax revenues and credits will still be there.
Germany will have to increase taxes to pull off this grand departure. That could make it the most expensive government debacle in recent memory.
What changes is this [...]
For the first time, a huge, guaranteed market will be opening up for alternative energy.
It will require new developments, infrastructure, improvements, and breakthroughs to make it work.
From Renewables International: The German switch from nuclear to renewables – myths and facts
...Germany actually has an action plan to reach 80 percent renewable power, and natural gas is a temporary part of that plan. In addition, a number of studies have been published to show how Germany could go 100 percent renewable such as here, here, here (PDF in German), and here (PDF in German). And let’s not forget the organization called 100% Erneuerbar – or the study called Energy Rich Japan that German researchers and one from Japan did on how Japan could get all of its energy from renewables way back in 2003. Do we Americans have any such plan?
* * *
'Open Heart Surgery' and The Business Buy-In
From Bloomberg:
"The energy transformation is open-heart surgery," Hannelore Kraft, state prime minister of North Rhine-Westphalia, said Dec. 20 in Essen. "We need a master plan and careful monitoring so this operation can succeed."
After lobbying against clean-energy subsidies for years, utilities are gearing up to make money from the industry. EON, the country's biggest operator of nuclear power stations, plans to invest 7 billion euros in renewable energy projects in the next five years. That includes 1 billion euros on the Amrumbank West wind farm in the German North Sea, a project that Siemens AG will supply with 80 of its turbines.
"We don't do this because we think it's nice, but because we believe we can be successful," Johannes Teyssen, EON's chief executive officer, said Dec. 20 in Essen. The German energy experiment, Teyssen said, is "a task that will occupy an entire generation." [...]
Already, Germany has built the world's biggest renewable generation complex, with 53.8 gigawatts of wind and solar generators at the end of last year. Italy last year added a record 9 gigawatts of solar panels, overtaking Germany for the first time. The U.K. plans 18 gigawatts of offshore wind capacity by 2020, up from 1,500 megawatts now.
Some of Germany's biggest companies are entering the renewables business and backing the innovations needed to make expand the scale of the industry.
Robert Bosch GmbH, the world's biggest car parts supplier based in Stuttgart, has invested about 1.5 billion euros into its solar energy business by purchasing companies and building new plants. Hochtief AG, Germany's biggest builder, has commissioned four heavy-duty ships to erect wind farms at sea including the 200 million euro "Innovation." [...]
"This energy transformation is about innovation," Roesler, the German economy minister, said in Stuttgart in January. "If we do it right, there will be many chances for economic growth."
# # #
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


48 Comments so far
Show All"It will require new developments, infrastructure, improvements, and breakthroughs to make it work." -- I'm a prolific inventor. I'm sitting on a great number of fundamental cost breakthroughs in various solar applications. It's a real shame for the world that nothing is getting done, year after year, because the money isn't there. But that's my axe to grind. There are probably a bunch of other small inventors with similar stories.
I would expect the climate-denying low-paid boiler room bloggers to show up here.
The necessities of the planet is behind your approach, so keep going until you suddenly find yourself in the main stream (of electrical currents). :-) - Not long now.
So the alternate approach is for you to build from the ground up. Build your stuff, and market it locally, on a sane level, sustainable level, just level, sensible level. You gotta target the market for owning. Give away your ideas so others can build the stuff too. If you have to have mega-bucks, you got the wrong idea. Get rid of it. Help build the people's infrastructure. Notice that in the process you will be building much greater things. It's so great it's a challenge to describe it. Every aspect of the human experience and the human soul are enhanced by this process of building the local economy. The experiences, memories, sentiments, ambitions, visions, ideas, and ideals are all shaped by the process of building self-determination. The results are something to celebrate, something to defend, something to pass on to the next generation, something to refine, mutate, expand, contract, and all of it is controlled by you, not them. You should go into business for yourself, so you'll never want to let anyone boss you again. You have to have the market in your own grip. Look around and your peers will all have the same. Squeeze it, and shape it, and don't let go of the market. Make a rhyme so you don't forget. Break the teeth of any far-flung elite who tries to take the local market from you. I think you're seeing now there are two worlds, the world of freedom, where you control production yourself and the world of slavery where someone else controls production for you. Easy choice. My pet frog could make the correct choice.
(I am assuming that the first thought to occur after reading the article would be some kind of envy, and a comparison of the "policies" in the USA. Also in Canada.)
This is what I had written a couple of days ago on another thread:
>>"... there were reports of Germany actually planning to open new coal plants following the protests after the Fukushima disaster, because when Germany closes down its nuclear power plants by 2022, the shortfall in electricity supply simply cannot be met by renewables alone, as per their estimate. Especially at current rates of consumption, and there is no indication that Germany is planning to cut back on overall energy consumption by that much by 2022. And the funny thing is, as far as I know, none of the people who got out on the streets to protest nuclear power came out protesting the proposal for new coal power plants -- proving once again that even the German people can be nothing more than NIMBY-ists!<<
So, if it turns out that these new developments have made the building of new coal power plants unnecessary, and that no new coal power plants will be built in Germany, I'll be happy to take back my criticism!
In my comment above, I was referring to news reports that came out last year, after Germany had announced plans to phase out all nuclear power plants. And that comment was made before this particular news story about renewables came out.
Germany to fund new coal plants with climate change cash (13 Jul 2011)
>>The German government wants to encourage the construction of new coal and gas power plants with millions of euros from a fund for promoting clean energy and combating climate change.
The plan has come under stiff criticism, but the Ministry of Economics and Technology defended the idea. A spokeswoman said it was necessary as the government switches from nuclear to other renewable energy sources and added that the money would promote the most efficient plants possible.
Opposition politicians and environmental groups said the plan was wrong because it would promote what they argued were climate-damaging plants. They also worried that money earmarked for other valuable projects could be reduced as a result.<<
Coal Replaces Nuclear in Germany - June 10, 2011
>>Germany needs build new gas and coal fired energy plants to exit nuclear power
German Chancellor Angela Merkel said Thursday Germany needs to add 20 gigawatts of Gas and Coal- fired power-generating capacity to guarantee power supply as the Country completely exits from nuclear power by Y 2022.
The German government previously estimated that it will need 10 gigawatts to fill the gap, as 10 gigawatts in fossil capacity have been planned and will be completed by Y 2013.
The newly planned fossil capacity is even more than the total power produced in Belgium, about 19.6 gigawatts, however, Ms. Merkel still insisted that Germany will reach its target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 40% from Y 1990 levels by Y 2020.<<
Germany Could Restart Nuclear Plant to Plug Energy Gap (13 Jul 2011)
>>Germany's energy agency is warning that one of the German reactors mothballed in the wake of Fukushima may have to be restarted to make up for possible power shortages this winter and next. Berlin is also using money earmarked for energy efficiency to subsidize coal-fired power plants.
... Merkel and her government have celebrated the phase out of nuclear energy in Germany as an "energy revolution" and vowed to make up for the capacity lost through the reactor shutdowns through billions in investments in renewable energies and energy savings measures. But according to a report in the daily Berliner Zeitung on Wednesday, some of that money has now been earmarked to subsidize the construction of new coal-fired power plants.<<
German Nuclear Decommissioning and Renewables Build-Out - October 27, 2011
>>On 30 May 2011, the German government decided to phase out its nuclear reactors by 2022. The Bundestag passed the measures by 513 to 79 votes at the end of June, and the Bundesrat vote on 8 July confirmed this.
Both houses of parliament approved construction of new coal and gas-fired plants and expand renwables energy. CO2 emission reduction targets remained unchanged.
... Germany has made the following near-term plans to augment and upgrade its energy generating and transmission systems. Most of these changes are to accommodate past build-outs of wind and solar capacity and the recent shutdown of 8 of the 23 nuclear reactors:
Coal: 11 GW of new coal plants, 6 GW of old coal plants to be phased out, for a net gain of 5 GW of coal plants.<<
I am hoping that this news today is a major shift from last year's plans, where there indeed were plans to build new coal and natural gas power plants.
insane.
Germany's plan is seen by some as an economic gamble, but many traditional energy companies -- including nuclear power companies -- are now lining up to invest in the strategic plan. One financial and energy analyst observed the plan would would make Germany's energy market, the most important in Europe, "into a massive energy laboratory."<<
Yeah? So be it! It's the kind of gamble and experiments that are needed. Especially where there is a culture of moving towards greater energy efficiency. I remember that in the past, Japan too used to gamble big time on such new technologies, partly with the hope of getting there first, and on occasion has got burnt. (Example: fuel cells, where they ended up investing heavily in all the major technologies, but one of their first choices never took off -- despite setting up the world's largest fuel cell power plant, and it was connected to the TEPCO grid, too!)
Here's an example of Germany's "gamble" that is paying off -- possibly at Canada's loss:
Canadian firm makes hay while the sun shines - in Germany
*************************************************
>>Arise Technologies Corp. launched in 1996 with the goal of creating Canada’s leading solar energy company.
Over the next decade, the Waterloo, Ont.-based company went public on the Toronto stock exchange and secured about $40-million in funding.
But while it had raised some money and had a great deal of ambition, it lacked the means to turn its idea into reality – it had no factory location in mind, much less enough financing to build one.
That all changed in May, 2006, when a German agency made Ian MacLellan, the founder and chief technology officer of Arise, an offer he couldn’t refuse: It would help finance and build the company’s first solar factory. For Arise, it meant a fortune in savings. For the Germany Trade & Invest group, it meant adding a new player to its rapidly expanding alternative energy industry – Europe’s largest.
A mere 19 months after the offer, a factory in Bischofswerda, a picturesque town in eastern Germany near Dresden, was churning out photovoltaic cells, which convert a free source of energy – sunlight – into electricity. “We couldn’t have done this project this fast anywhere else,” he say, referring to the generous incentives available to foreign investors.
Since then, the factory, with 150 employees, has added a second production line. A third is coming this year as demand for PV equipment rises at triple-digit rates as alternative energy subsidies roll in and PV costs fall. “Germany has a real commitment to manufacturing quality,” Mr. MacLellan, 54, says. “It made real sense to expand here.”
... ...
It’s fair to say that Arise owes its manufacturing success to Germany.
When it started out, Arise didn’t have a penny of profits or revenue (it is still losing money) because it had no factory. Its first big break on the factory front came in March, 2006, when a German PV magazine carried a story on Arise. It was read by the Germany Trade & Invest team, which decided the ambitious little Canadian company should put down roots in Germany. It tracked down Mr. MacLellan at a PV conference in Hawaii two months later and made its pitch.
The German government agencies had a lot to offer. The biggie was a €25-million ($35-million) grant to cover half of the factory’s construction cost. But that’s not the only reason Arise chose Germany, Mr. MacLellan says.
The other selling points were help in site selection, an educated work force that did not demand outrageous incomes and, crucially, construction expertise. “We built the factory in eight months,” he says. “The Germans understood what we wanted because they had built so many PV factories before.”
Germany’s cornucopia of incentives have created the world’s biggest PV market, measured by installed capacity. (In 2010, Italy and the Czech Republic ranked second and third, with China taking 10th spot.) Germany Trade & Invest says the PV industry invested €19.5-billion in Germany in 2010 alone and that the PV makers located there had sales of €12.2-billion that year. Industry employment reached 107,800 in 2010.
Some of the industry’s biggest players – Sovello, First Solar and Sunfilm, among them – have set up shop in Germany. Arise makes all its PV cells in Germany and has no plans for a Canadian PV factory. Its total PV cell production has reached 25 million units, valued at $150-million, over three years.
*************************************************
Say no more. - Or rather say a lot more, in favor of sustainable energy sources. They are easily available, the technology exists, and they have the potential of solving most of the environmental and social problems humanity are facing today - including population increase, as almost free and sustainable energy-sources take away the need to have many children to sustain their parents, disseminates technologies spreading info on contraception and family planning, and makes living for joy rather than for growth and consumption viable.
The only problem sustainable energy sources don't solve is how to control and enslave the masses in toil and debt - but that's being worked on...
Remember Al Gore - caving in to Republican hired thugs in Florida upsetting the vote-count that later was confirmed to have given Gore the victory - in tally, not in practice.
Liberals lost defending the USA against that coup d'etat by fascists, oops - "conservatives", who used the conservative-stacked Supreme Court for a circular argument to give the election to George Baby Bush ("The counting must be ended or else it would upset Bush's chances to win" - similar words to that effect) .
Democrats showed themselves as cowards, preferring a polite tone over defending democracy. Then, 8 years later, Obama wimped in, being so "bipartisan" with crooks, that the fascists, oops - "conservatives", rejoiced all the way to the Federal Reserve to take out some trillions for high living.
http://www.jillstein.org/
But our so-called state-corp "leaders" are keeping us in a backwater, greed sump, warprison, spyfiasco, rigged bank, oilbased frackingclusterf*&k race to the bottom.
A gigawatt is a billion watts - so as per that estimate above, it breaks down to 1,250 watts per home.
Now, there are a few appliances which can individually consume that much or more, so 1,250 watts may not look like much. But usually these heavier appliances are used for a much shorter period. Or should be.
If much of the heating load is taken care of by solar (including passive solar), and where possible, geothermal, heating, and if efficient lighting is used, it should be possible to greatly reduce the demand for electricity.
And if commercial establishments stop certain insane wastes such as escalators running nonstop even with no one on them, supermarkets leaving the freezers open, etc., electricity load can be reduced much further.
And reducing demand for electricity is key. It is the most important step before coal power plants can be shut down. There is no point in setting up all these renewable energy systems only to power insane waste of energy and insane "amusements" of all kinds. The Las Vegas Strip alone would need more than a gigawatt (i.e., 1,000 megawatts) of electricity.
whocares;)
whocares;)
Solar hardware is easily portable, when compared to the portability of coal, nuclear, or other forms of dirty electric production.
I think of it like an new car, use it 10 years, then give it to some kid...with the kid's benefit in mind, I would rather give a kid a used electric car as compared to my old pickup.
whocares;)
this article is great news... but this part about large corporations buying up small (and more innovative and job-creating and democratic) companies... we need to make this happen in a different way in the US.
Corporations are not going to do it voluntarily; it's up to us as Occupy to convince them and our elected representatives it's the right way and the only way.