Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Occupy Movement to Blossom as Spring Approaches
Groups from across the country planning actions in the coming weeks and months
The Occupy movement is hoping to increase its presence as the cold winter months come to an end. Many Occupy groups from across the country are planning new actions in the coming weeks.
Occupy Protesters Marching in Boston. Many Occupy groups are planning to increase activity in the Spring. (Flickr photo: Occupy Boston) Occupy the MidWest is planning a conference this weekend and is hoping the warmer weather will help provide the movement a spark.
From CBS St. Louis.
The Occupy movement is looking to bloom early this year from hibernation thanks to unseasonably warm weather across much of the U.S.
“The warmer weather brings out larger chunks of the population who are not able to participate in the colder months,” Chuck Witthaus, an organizer with Occupy the Midwest, told CBS St. Louis. “It’s definitely going to help perpetuate [the Occupy movement].”
The weather is merely a coincidence for what organizers are hoping will be the true jumping-off point for Occupy’s 2012 comeback.
Occupy the Midwest, a large-scale convention intended to breathe new life into the movement, is set to take place this weekend in St. Louis. And it was not organized around the early increase in temperatures.
“There was a lull over the winter, a hibernation period where we went into an indoor planning mode for discussing tactics to use when we reemerged in the spring, as a way to strengthen occupations and bring them back together,” Witthaus said.
At UMass Boston, where students have been occupying the campus since January, organizers have moved their encampment from the inside of the Student Center to an area outside on the campus.
From the Boston Globe:
After camping out in their campus center for 50 days, the Occupy UMass Boston University of Massachusetts Boston movement has shifted outside.
Wednesday marked the third day the group has claimed a spot on the school’s plaza in a military tent that was used as a kitchen during Occupy Boston's encampment downtown. They city cleared out the downtown encampment in December.
“We’ve been talking with the administration and decided to take the movement outside,” said Matthew Gauvain, 29, a UMass Boston student originally from Lynn.
Richard Kim, writing in the Nation magazine yesterday, further explained how Occupy plans to be more active now that Spring is approaching.
In people’s living rooms, in donated office spaces and in indoor parks, Occupy’s working groups are as busy as they were in the fall. Occupy Our Homes has resisted foreclosures and evictions in dozens of cities across the country. Occupy the SEC filed a public comment on the Volcker Rule urging regulators to strengthen this aspect of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act. Other groups have been hard at work on issues ranging from student debt to alternative banking to worker-owned cooperatives. Meanwhile, protests—against police brutality; against corporations like Bank of America, Pfizer and Walmart; against budget cuts; and against institutions like the Whitney Museum—have continued at an almost frenetic pace. Organizers have also been using the winter to incubate grander plans, among them a May 1 Day of Action that may turn into a call for a nationwide general strike and proposals to occupy corporate shareholder meetings, the NATO summit in Chicago, and the Democratic and Republican conventions at the end of the summer.
There’s no question that Occupy will be back this spring—it never really went away. But what will this second stage look like?
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


44 Comments so far
Show All--but i expect a cold snap any time from now through early may.
so, we might need to do both;
make plans and play it by ear.
The cons' worst nightmare is libs and progs with guns. Oligarchy Hollywood propaganda venues have convinced liberals that it is the "moral" thing to remain unarmed, against Washington, Jefferson and other forefather's advice..
It would be a giant public relations coup to announce that the liberal and progressive majority has armed itself well, has learned to use guns, and is prepared to defend itself against conservative abuse and exploitation.
If I were to select a jack-booted group of fascists who are perhaps as large a danger to American society as I could pick today, I would pick BATF [the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms]. -- U.S. Representative John Dingell, 1980
That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United states who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms... -- Samuel Adams, in "Phila. Independent Gazetteer", August 20, 1789
[The disarming of citizens] has a double effect, it palsies the hand and brutalizes the mind: a habitual disuse of physical forces totally destroys the moral [force]; and men lose at once the power of protecting themselves, and of discerning the cause of their oppression. -- Joel Barlow, "Advice to the Privileged Orders", 1792-93
To make inexpensive guns impossible to get is to say that you're putting a money test on getting a gun. It's racism in its worst form. -- Roy Innis, president of the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), 1988
I don't like the idea that the police department seems bent on keeping a pool of unarmed victims available for the predations of the criminal class. -- David Mohler, 1989, on being denied a carry permit in NYC
Americans have the will to resist because you have weapons. If you don't have a gun, freedom of speech has no power. -- Yoshimi Ishikawa, Japanese author, in the LA Times 15 Oct 1992
You know why there's a Second Amendment? In case the government fails to follow the first one. -- Rush Limbaugh, in a moment of unaccustomed profundity 17 Aug 1993
When only cops have guns, it's called a "police state". Love your country, but never trust its government. -- Robert A. Heinlein.
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. -- John F. Kennedy
An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life. -- Robert A. Heinlein, "Beyond This Horizon", 1942
The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered Eastern peoples to have arms. History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so. -- Hitler, April 11 1942
The right to buy weapons is the right to be free. -- A.E. Van Vogt, "The Weapon Shops Of Isher", ASF December 1942
Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon -- so long as there is no answer to it -- gives claws to the weak. -- George Orwell, "You and the Atom Bomb", 1945
Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of the citizens to keep and bear arms. [...] the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government and one more safeguard against a tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible. -- Hubert H. Humphrey, 1960
No matter how one approaches the figures, one is forced to the rather startling conclusion that the use of firearms in crime was very much less when there were no controls of any sort and when anyone, convicted criminal or lunatic, could buy any type of firearm without restriction. Half a century of strict controls on pistols has ended, perversely, with a far greater use of this weapon in crime than ever before. -- Colin Greenwood, in the study "Firearms Control", 1972
Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws." -- Edward Abbey, "Abbey's Road", 1979
"To disarm the people... was the best and most effectual way to enslave them." -- George Mason, speech of June 14, 1788
Are we at last brought to such a humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our own defence? Where is the difference between having our arms in our own possession and under our own direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defence be the *real* object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? -- Patrick Henry, speech of June 9 1788
"Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest." -- Mahatma Gandhi
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government" -- Thomas Jefferson, 1 Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334
"The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference - they deserve a place of honor with all that's good" -- George Washington
My point is arming OWS will simply speed the fascism along faster than it is already going. Unless, of course, you are advocating that we start a full-out Revolution, in which case obviously weapons would be required, contrary to what the hippies on the left insist. I should point out, however, that advocating - or hell, even typing "revolution" - on the internet automatically puts you on the CIA watch lists, but you probably already knew that. Oops - guess I'm on it now, too....shit....
I don't call for armed revolution. But liberals and progressives are being persecuted by the government and armed conservatives are not. Libs should demand the equal treatment guaranteed by our constitution including the right to carry guns peacefully, like the Tea Partiers do.
"Do you think the military would kill thousands of its own countrymen, women, brothers, sisters and friends for exercising their constitutional rights?"
You're kidding, right? Do you really think American soldiers are that different from Syrian soldiers or Egyptian soldiers? How about German soldiers or Romanian soldiers or Argentinian soldiers? Or...hell...how about the Ludlow massacre and Kent State?
Not only could it happen here, it has!
If you want to arm yourself to the teeth and go against the military, be my guest. But don't urge others to do something insanely foolish based on a naive assumption.
I don't go against the military, I am military. I go against using the military for private gain instead of for public service:
“War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses."
Marine Major General Smedley Darlington Butler
You had better wake up, and quickly.
The Black Panthers, for a while, got away with armed defense of their own homes. And then they got massacred. The Philadelphia Black liberation group MOVE got into armed confrontation with the police, so police dropped an aerial bomb on their apartment which destroyed several city blocks.The Symbionese Liberation Army got decimated by the LAPD and FBI. The American Indian Movement radicals at Wounded Knee were overpowered.
What about Ruby Ridge and Waco? What about the 2010 FBI raid on the Michigan-based Christian Hutaree militia? Left, Right, the government is an equal opportunity reactionary and can overpower any armed citizen group.
Nothing would destroy the credibility of and support for #Occupy quicker than demonstrators arming themselves. The Tea Party is not a threat to anyone - their public carrying was merely theater.
Direct democracy
How thoroughly idiotic and chickenshit.
"Syria today demonstrates what happens when a poorly-armed citizenry stands up to a modern military."
If the dead could speak, Gaddhaffi would tell you what happens when a well-armed citizenry stands up to a well armed military.
I don't advocate violent revolution. A well-armed citizenry prevents the powerful few from oppressing the many to the point that a violent revolution would happen.
The Panthers, SLA, AIM, Ruby Ridge, Waco, Hutaree were small fringe groups with little or no public support. The well armed citizenry our forefathers advised was the entire population, not just individuals or small groups of individuals that the oligarchy can make an example of to frighten the rest into submission.
I see you bought the official propaganda hook, lone and sinker.
Gaddhaffi was removed from power by a well planned, NATO supported civil war with the 'rebels' being reinforced by disguised elements of US Special Forces and UK SAS troopers and targeted NATO airstrikes.
IF Gaddhaffi had survived to reach a trial, he would have sung like a bird, revealing CIA torture sites in Libya, along with other multiple US violations of international law.
The Black Panthers DID have massive public support. IN THIER PARTICULAR SOCIETY. That's why they were eliminated. They were recognized as a legitimate threat to the Elite's monopoly on violence.
The Panthers had support in their particular society which had little public support.
Grab your knees
The Black Panthers had little WHITE public support, ie, support of those controlled by the Elite.
Learn to read. You might actually learn something.
The Libyan citizenry became a threat after they acquired modern weaponry. I don't think Gaddhaffi was doing any riding through Tripoli after that.
"Learn to read. You might actually learn something. "
Learn to read notes out of people's assholes because that's all you will get to read in the gulag.
This is the big news. This the part that makes the elites shudder. The rest of it makes the elites snicker.
And all the while the action ought to be over "the unseasonably warm weather", a.k.a. start-up of runaway climate extreming. But good luck with the actions. They may get to the core problems yet: harmonizing 7 billion people - and no more - with the biosphere of Earth.
It is true that with voting machines there are no checks and balances. Not so with direct online democracy.
If you can bank safely online, pay your taxes online, buy stuff online, and if corporations, banks, government, defense, and everything else can carry out their business online with proper safeguards, We the 313 million People, should be able to propose laws and vote them up or down online, by phone and snail mail instead of letting 500 sold out, corrupt politicians make the laws to favor the oligarchy banks, corporations and the MIC.
And we can vote on and propose laws continuously at the town, state, country and global level, whenever it concerns us instead of every four years or so, to keep up with rapidly accelerating change.
If direct democracy works well in small countries like Switzerland and Ecuador, with IT it will work well nationally and globally. The digital age means we no longer need obsolete, corrupt and unresponsive government by the few.
Who knows what is best for us than ourselves?
IT produced the OWS, Tunisia and the Arab Spring. It is time to take it to its logical next level, decentralized and direct online democracy.
Yep. And with current technology, the Government can, will and does MONITOR every single keystroke.
It has been proven beyond any doubt that the US electoral system is thoroughly compromised and corrupt. From so-called 'black box' voting to plain old vote tampering, the US routinely 'adjusts' the election results to provide the outcome that the Elite requires.
"It is time to take it to its logical next level, decentralized and direct online democracy."
Yes. Online 'Democracy(tm)', where the entire process and all the technology will be in the controlling hands of the Corporations providing the technology. Thank you for even more 'magical thinking' from a cargo cult devotee.
What makes you think the technology will be in corporate hands? Even if it was, in a direct democracy, we the people could fire them and hire another by simple referendum. Try doing that today. And if We the People were the government, as it should be, we wouldn't be spying on each other would we?