Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- This Is What Happens When You Rip a Hole in the Safety Net
- So Your Groundwater's Poison and Your Tap Water's On Fire. Not to Worry: Fracking Chemicals Are Trade Secrets You Don't Need To Know About
- An Outpouring of Love and Support for Bradley Manning to Receive the Nobel Peace Prize
- Exxon Tar Sands Spill Continues to Devastate Arkansas Community
- Exxon's Unfriendly Skies: Why Does Exxon Control the No-Fly Zone Over Arkansas Tar Sands Spill?
Popular content
Today's Top News
Republican Congressman Wants to 'Sell Off Some of Our National Parks'
A video showing Rep. Cliff Stearns (R, Florida) announcing his desire to "sell off some of our national parks" was recently filmed and released on the Internet by the Florida Political Action Cooperative.
Mount St. Nicholas in Glacier National Park. Rep. Cliff Stearns recently expressed the view that the United States should sell some of its national parks. (Photo: National Park Service) In a speech given at a town hall meeting in Belleview Florida, Stearns explained his position.
I got attacked in a previous town meeting for not supporting another national park in this country, a 200-mile trailway. And I told the man that we don't need more national parks in this country, we need to actually sell off some of our national parks, and try and do what a normal family would do is — they wouldn’t ask Uncle Joe for a loan, they would sell their Cadillac, or they would take their kids out of private schools and put them into public schools to save to money instead of asking for their credit card to increase their debt ceiling.
Think Progress reports on the issue and notes the funds that US national parks bring into the treasury:
Our national parks represent America’s heritage, held in trust from one generation to the next.
Despite Stearns’ idea for a national-park fire sale, the facts show that parks, monuments, and other protected places generate a steady stream of wealth for both the treasury and local businesses. In 2010, Florida’s Everglades National Park generated 2,364 jobs and over $140 million in visitor spending, and Florida’s 11 national parks in total provided $582 million in economic benefits. The National Park Service also reports that America’s parks overall created $31 billion and 258,000 jobs in 2010. In addition to their economic impacts, national parks have important value in that they are available to all of us for recreation, not just the wealthy few.
This is not the first time Republican members of Congress have advocated selling off Americans’ public lands without clarifying how taxpayers would get a fair return for them. Last fall, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) proposed selling off 3.3 million acres of the public lands that belong to all of us. And former Rep. Richard Pombo proposed selling national parks to mining companies in 2005.
Republican presidential candidates have also recently been confused about the tangible and intangible values of our national parks and public lands. Mitt Romney told the Reno Gazette-Journal that he doesn’t know “what the purpose is” of public lands, Rick Santorum told Idahoans that public lands should go “back to the hands” of the private sector, and Ron Paul advocated for public lands to be turned over to the states.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

86 Comments so far
Show AllOne spring, while we were camping in Shenandoah park, all the trees were in pink and white blossom - just a fairyland vision. Then it snowed, a sudden swirling blizzard, and all that was covered in white. It is hard to describe the beauty of the scene. How could a person like me, raised in the projects of the Bronx, ever know such wonderful thing could exist if it were not there for the public?
Ah, I hope we can at least keep these wild places as treasures, while the 1% tries to squander everything else. These wild places, seem to attract a very healthy culture of respect of others, and reverence to the earth and her treasures.
One can't be too sentimental about such things. We must keep these places as a people. Feeling that deep sentiment, makes me reflect on what must have been an unbearable tragedy for Native Americans who were driven from their beloved lands.
Yes, indeed.
print a big pile of money, loan it out at 0% to the buyer -- some hedge fund or the like-- so they can pay cash for the park by giving the treasury the $ back. sounds like a great deal to me!
of course you could just leave the $ in the treasury and keep the park.
1.give out huge tax breaks to you and your vampire buddies
2. rasie everyone elses taxes
3. cut services
4. corporate tax cut
5. run the Fed for Worker Insecurity
6. inflate away our wages
7. bankrupt the government
8. cut government - especially the part that investigates the 1%'s financial crimes
9. Yell the Debt is Killing us
10. Cut guv even more
11. sell off the nice parts of the country for a nickle on the dollar
12. fence out the riffraff - aka the 99%
13.build a nice little 30,000 sf mansion made from old growth forest built in the middle of the most pristine watershed(w 6 - 1500 sf "guest cabins" because you know there's not enough room in the mansion for the oligarchs buddies)
14. build a private golf course and accompanying Ski Resort w gov Economic Stimulus funds
An old postcard in Montana featured some rich scumbag and his wife enjoying the view of Glacier Nat Park - the wife exclaims "Isn't this perfect"?
The husband with visions of the wilderness plowed over and made into a manicured golf course with private retreat cabins and swimming pools etc replies "Almost".
Selling off the nice parts of the country is the End game -
"If I ask you a question, do you promise not to get mad at me?"
"Of course", I said, "you can ask me anything"
"PROMISE you won't get mad"
"I promise"
"Somebody wrote on a desk Fuck the Liberals."
"So what's a liberal?"
(I still have no good answer)